No, really...

Indigo.Rose said:
God did this hypocritical and useless babble ever make you look even more retarded. LOL.

Try taking the crack pipe out of your mouth... you'll make a bit more sense.

Go back to defending drunk drivers and baby killers.

PBW
 
Indigo.Rose said:
LOL there is no need to flame you, you just keep doing it all by yourself. This is a testement to even more stupidity and narrow minded bullshit on your part. As I already stated before, no, I can't win this because you're too thick to bother getting off your high horse to realize you're a complete idiot in this instance.

I've almost never come across some one whose rampant ignorance rules him so completely, it's sad to see really. You put words in my mouth to get your point across, that's even sadder, you pussy. Everyone here knows you are wrong with this bullshit argument, you're the only one who thinks you have a clue, which is understandable since you seem to think you are the end all, beat all grand fucking poobah of everything under the sun.

Ask yourself one thing, being a friend of Artful, do you think he would enjoy the fact that you're using him in whatever form to continue a pointless argument that you will never win since you are so far out in left feild we can't even see your fat ass any more? Do you think that you, as his friend are showing a great deal of respect? you might think it's ok because you're supposedly standing up for him, but in all actuality you are using the memory of a supposedly great man to perpetuate hate and ignorance and distribute your narrow minded bullshit about the place. You're a real fucking winner, god damn I sure as fuck hope there is some useless tit such as yourself to use my name to dispense hate when I finally kick the fucking bucket.

Well, now that I've called you a stupid you've called me stupid, what else have ya got? Nothin? Yeah, that's what I thought.

First, I never said I was great or even close friends with Artful. I knew him in passing. I'm not here to defend him. I've stated my point very clearly, you dumbass. I said it was a sick comment. Care to argue with that? I said that you and others going thru all these motions to explain it, doesn't make it any better. Can you argue with that. Nope, didn't think so. I said Ginny should have just admitted that it was a stupid thing to say and then shut up. Can you argue with that? Ahhh... no? I thought so.

So... it's clearly obvious that you can come up with several different ways to call me stupid. Did ya have to get out the dictionary? And you make the wrong assumption that I'm all up on myself and that I'm only here to defend Artful.

I notice you are degrading into using swear words. Am I getting to ya? Am I getting to ya? Am I getting to ya? LOL... you are sad little girl. Don't play with adults if you can't handle your shit.

Now, if you care to actually argue the points, please, I invite you to respond. If you can't and just want to keep coming up with new ways to say I'm stupid, then bring it on. I'll come up with just as many ways to tell ya to suck my dick.

I have to say... I applaud you for sticking to your guns... even if you are defending the person that would make a sick joke about the dead. To me, it should be added to the definition of retarded: Continually arguing when you have no leg to stand on.

You're kinda like those people that attempt to merge onto a 65-mph highway traveling only 40-mph.

I await your next obscenity-laced, nonsensical post. Oh, and try to come up with something a tad bit more original that calling me stupid. People are getting bored of you... which I guess might be a step up from being sickened by you.

PBW
 
Indigo.Rose said:
That's the most ridiculous thing you have come out with yet, you stupid fuck. When on earth have I ever defended baby killers? Are you really this stupid?

Please don't tell me I have to explain in detail how utterly moronic these claims are?


Yanno what? At this point, I think a wife beater is better than you. You just turn my stomach.

Go do whatever it is you do.

I'm out.

PBW
 
This thread was supposed to be about Lance, right? Here's my take on him, but first, this is why I hate him:

http://www.maximonline.com/grit/worst_job/images/photo.jpg

This clown appears whenever I do a picture search. If it weren't for Lance, I would have never noticed.

Lance is a master shit disturber. I respect his skills with the flare.

His debating skills are beyond most literoticans and I would have to attribute that to his Canadian citizenship. Our brand of humour is unmatched. Throw wit into an argument and a standard debaters are thrown for a loop.

But I do not follow him around like white on rice. ADD would not allow that. Recycled flames are boring after a while.
 
P. B. Walker said:
I actually agree with these few points of lavenders. Lance does treat genders differently. JMHO.

PBW

Okay, I'll have a look at them:


Okay, PB, I'll have a look at them then:

Originally posted by lavender
1. I challenge this assertion. Your first posts to me were when I had an avatar of a lego on this board. You thought I was male. After this you thought I was a lesbian. When you found out I was a heterosexual female who was assertive your entire attitude and posts on the board changed towards me.

Lance:

I knew you were a straight chik at the time...I was making fun of you and your little lego tank when you appeared to try and beat me up without so much as a "Howdy!" during Cymwar. As I learned more about you I was able to fight you with the material you gave me in your assinine posts.

Laurel had already asked Cym to be less of a hothead more than once in the year preceeding.

Others there and Laurel explained the ongoing troubles with Cym to me in PM's.

Cym had left in a huff on LitBreaks before and after I got there.

Cym had had big blowouts with Artful and WriterDom before I got there.

Cym wanted a Forum where everyone marched to her tune...and she didn't like dominant straight men very much except for her own Master...and at the time, she didn't have one and was out of work.

I became her latest....and last... Lit Target. She and those who stood with her to assassinate me were unsuccessful and most of them left with her to start "Cymtalk.com"...where the same kind of fights have erupted without my being there.

Many of those people have returned....and I interact with them in the BDSM Forum without issue.

A few of you, imported troops from the GB, continue to look for ways to finish what you couldn't during Cymwar over here on the GB.

I'm not interested in kicking your ass anymore over a fight that you had no business sticking your nose in in the first place.

Your theory fails on the facts. Bugger off.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2. Secondly, gender is of importance to you. There were men arguing points with you at the same time women were, but you have chosen the women - Sunstruck, KM, cymbidia, Risia and me to question and to insult. It took a helluva long time before you started including a man in that brigade. You finally did, months after the fact when Ishmael started attacking you so forcefully.

Lance:

Cymwar was started by the Evil Queen Cym and female pals against Me. I was fighting women because women were attacking me.

As you've noted, I have only argued with men who have attacked me first.

Guess what? I've only fought with women that have attacked me first.

Conclusion From Your Facts: Lance sometimes fights back against people who attack him.

That's pretty damning stuff. Ha!

Your theory fails on the facts. Bugger off.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

3. The way you address men and women on this board is decidedly different. If you don't think so, go back and check your posts. Go back and check the way you dealt with Rambrat after his incident, versus the way you dealt with Freya2 or pretty lil stranger (although pretty lil stranger was some type of paternalism "I know better than you do" type methodology). Anyone who can read your posts and honestly believe you do not treat genders differently on the board is ludicrous.

Lance:

In the case of Rambrat & Tatanah it was obvious in the first few posts that her death was a scam.

What you don't know is that Ishmael PM'd me (and presumably others) with Advanced Copy of his revelations of personal involvement in the matter.

I treated the matter differently because it was different.

I have given blunt, direct personal advice to lots of guys, particularly on the BDSM Forum...threads you've not seen...just like I gave PLS.

Freya2's loss of her father came at the same time in 2002 as I lost my father in 2001, so it struck a chord with me.

Three examples, all different reactions, all situational, none gender related.

Your theory fails on the facts. Bugger off.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

4. You use women's sexuality against them in arguments, you have done this with people other than just Muffie. If that is a point that you will use in argumentation, a person's gender is of importance. I rarely see you talking about how women must dominate a weaker man or how they must get dick slapped all the time by their woman. You can say it until you are blue in the face, gender plays a huge role in the way you post on this board. It may not be conscious, but it is a factor.

Lance:

I'll use whatever you give me as ammo if you attack me, regardless of your gender.

My favorite arguments are those where I can toss the attackers words back to display the vacuous, personal agenda being pursued.

Because you're a law student who thinks she knows more than she actually does and likes showing off her "education"...I use it against you when you attack me.

Because Ishmael is an AlphaDom many years my senior who actively shops here for younger babes and tends to use "proofs" in his posts that are marginal at best with vigour replacing actual authority, I toss those chunks of phleghm back in his lap every time he comes a'gunnin.

You get back what you come to my door with, grrl or boy.

I'm an equal opportunity right back atcha debater.

Your theory fails on the facts. Bugger off.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

5. Your notions of gender equality are very consistent with traditionalists, within the mold of classical liberal thinking. This type of thinker only sees the gross actions against women based on their gender to be truly inequal. The invidious discrimination of women is harder to identify, to pinpoint, and thus harder to prove.


Lance:

So hard to prove apparently that it's a systemic conspiracy for you, one that you are unable to apply specifically to Me.

Your theory fails on the facts. Bugger off.



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
6. I don't know how you deal with women in the real world Lance. I can't even assume to know this. But, for the purposes of the board, you do not treat men and women equally. You may believe in gender equality, but what you say on this board does not reflect this opinion - unless you are talking in the abstract about policies rather than your own actions.

Lance:

You're right....you don't know how I interact with women IRL.

And no, I don't treat all people the same...but I do treat everyone who is nice to me the same way in return...and those who take a swipe at me get at least one back....JazzManJim, Azwed, Ishmael, Miles, Busybody, Lasher, etc etc etc.

Your theory fails on the facts. Bugger off.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

7. I can claim up and down that I believe one way, but if my actions indicate something else, how strongly do I truly believe in the ideal I purport to support?

Lance:

You purport to support The First Amendment....yet most everything you do here is at best a thinly veiled attempt to judge and control others thoughts and expressions....right down to spelling & grammar.

At the same time as you try to tell me how I think and what my values are, Ms Freedom of Expression.....you had all evidence of your values, points of view and positions....erased by Laurel in case anyone tried to use them against you in the future.

Sorry to burst your bubble, but repeated attacks in which you say I don't have particular values don't automatically make it so, Mein Fuhrer......and as you've said, you really don't know much about me

Your theory fails on the facts. Bugger off.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
Last edited:
Ezarc said:
Um, is there a cunt of the year one for you?
Actually, I think it might be an insult to cunts to have you associated with them.
 
Indigo.Rose said:
It just doesn't end with you huh? I can't help but find bigger better ways to tell you how brainless you are, I'm absolutely astounded at the level of stupidity coming from you. I really am, it baffles my mind how you can be so moronic. You're like a car accident, you don't want to look but you have to, only you're so stupid that I have to comment on it, whether i want to or not, I really have no choice, I'm just so shocked.

I've already argued the points you've just challenged me to argue, and you pig headedly refuse to see any other side but your own, while every one else here including myself has tried to see your side as well as our own.

Could you be any more hypocritical? Every single one of your posts is yet another detailed hypoctitical rant.

Did I mention how stupid you were?

I'm done with you, and no, don't even begin to think that you have "won" anything, since there was nothing to win here in the first place, but I'll tell you this, you have lost something, it's called respect, something you are obviously unfamiliar with. you may now sit down and shut up, when I want your opinion again I will unzip.

I said shut up.

Stop typing. Fool.


Tell ya what. Go back and change your posts so that you actually have an argument... then come back and quote them back to me so I can see where you actually argued those points with anything resembling logic or common sense. I would just LOVE to see where you can actually argue where it's ok to piss on the dead. Please, please, please show me Mrs. Smarty Pants.

I see your post was as I predicted. It's scary being this smart.

I'm not sure how you can call me hypocritcal... that would imply that I've actually argued that it's ok to piss on the dead in another place and time.

OH yeah.. and before you call me stupid again, yes I know. Thanks sweetie. Now go back to sucking it. Remember, no teeth. That's a good little slut cocksucker. Your momma taught you well.

Ok... I will now predict that you will hurt yourself trying to think of something else to say besides that I'm stupid, and then you'll throw your hands in the air and call me stupid again.

PBW "Toddles, child-molester"
 
Last edited:
Rubyfruit said:
Me too!

I really like the thought of a woman peeing on another woman.


Yanno... I think you might be right... woman to woman peeing is somehow sexier :)

PBW
 
Lancecastor said:
Okay, PB, I'll have a look at them then:

Originally posted by lavender
1. I challenge this assertion. Your first posts to me were when I had an avatar of a lego on this board. You thought I was male. After this you thought I was a lesbian. When you found out I was a heterosexual female who was assertive your entire attitude and posts on the board changed towards me.

Lance:

I knew you were a straight chik at the time...I was making fun of you and your little lego tank when you appeared to try and beat me up without so much as a "Howdy!" during Cymwar. As I learned more about you I was able to fight you with the material you gave me in your assinine posts.

Laurel had already asked Cym to be less of a hothead more than once in the year preceeding.

Others there and Laurel explained the ongoing troubles with Cym to me in PM's.

Cym had left in a huff on LitBreaks before and after I got there.

Cym had had big blowouts with Artful and WriterDom before I got there.

Cym wanted a Forum where everyone marched to her tune...and she didn't like dominant straight men very much except for her own Master...and at the time, she didn't have one and was out of work.

I became her latest....and last... Lit Target. She and those who stood with her to assassinate me were unsuccessful and most of them left with her to start "Cymtalk.com"...where the same kind of fights have erupted without my being there.

Many of those people have returned....and I interact with them in the BDSM Forum without issue.

A few of you, imported troops from the GB, continue to look for ways to finish what you couldn't during Cymwar over here on the GB.

I'm not interested in kicking your ass anymore over a fight that you had no business sticking your nose in in the first place.

Your theory fails on the facts. Bugger off.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2. Secondly, gender is of importance to you. There were men arguing points with you at the same time women were, but you have chosen the women - Sunstruck, KM, cymbidia, Risia and me to question and to insult. It took a helluva long time before you started including a man in that brigade. You finally did, months after the fact when Ishmael started attacking you so forcefully.

Lance:

Cymwar was started by the Evil Queen Cym and female pals against Me. I was fighting women because women were attacking me.

As you've noted, I have only argued with men who have attacked me first.

Guess what? I've only fought with women that have attacked me first.

Conclusion From Your Facts: Lance sometimes fights back against people who attack him.

That's pretty damning stuff. Ha!

Your theory fails on the facts. Bugger off.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

3. The way you address men and women on this board is decidedly different. If you don't think so, go back and check your posts. Go back and check the way you dealt with Rambrat after his incident, versus the way you dealt with Freya2 or pretty lil stranger (although pretty lil stranger was some type of paternalism "I know better than you do" type methodology). Anyone who can read your posts and honestly believe you do not treat genders differently on the board is ludicrous.

Lance:

In the case of Rambrat & Tatanah it was obvious in the first few posts that her death was a scam.

What you don't know is that Ishmael PM'd me (and presumably others) with Advanced Copy of his revelations of personal involvement in the matter.

I treated the matter differently because it was different.

I have given blunt, direct personal advice to lots of guys, particularly on the BDSM Forum...threads you've not seen...just like I gave PLS.

Freya2's loss of her father came at the same time in 2002 as I lost my father in 2001, so it struck a chord with me.

Three examples, all different reactions, all situational, none gender related.

Your theory fails on the facts. Bugger off.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

4. You use women's sexuality against them in arguments, you have done this with people other than just Muffie. If that is a point that you will use in argumentation, a person's gender is of importance. I rarely see you talking about how women must dominate a weaker man or how they must get dick slapped all the time by their woman. You can say it until you are blue in the face, gender plays a huge role in the way you post on this board. It may not be conscious, but it is a factor.

Lance:

I'll use whatever you give me as ammo if you attack me, regardless of your gender.

My favorite arguments are those where I can toss the attackers words back to display the vacuous, personal agenda being pursued.

Because you're a law student who thinks she knows more than she actually does and likes showing off her "education"...I use it against you when you attack me.

Because Ishmael is an AlphaDom many years my senior who actively shops here for younger babes and tends to use "proofs" in his posts that are marginal at best with vigour replacing actual authority, I toss those chunks of phleghm back in his lap every time he comes a'gunnin.

You get back what you come to my door with, grrl or boy.

I'm an equal opportunity right back atcha debater.

Your theory fails on the facts. Bugger off.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

5. Your notions of gender equality are very consistent with traditionalists, within the mold of classical liberal thinking. This type of thinker only sees the gross actions against women based on their gender to be truly inequal. The invidious discrimination of women is harder to identify, to pinpoint, and thus harder to prove.


Lance:

So hard to prove apparently that it's a systemic conspiracy for you, one that you are unable to apply specifically to Me.

Your theory fails on the facts. Bugger off.



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
6. I don't know how you deal with women in the real world Lance. I can't even assume to know this. But, for the purposes of the board, you do not treat men and women equally. You may believe in gender equality, but what you say on this board does not reflect this opinion - unless you are talking in the abstract about policies rather than your own actions.

Lance:

You're right....you don't know how I interact with women IRL.

And no, I don't treat all people the same...but I do treat everyone who is nice to me the same way in return...and those who take a swipe at me get at least one back....JazzManJim, Azwed, Ishmael, Miles, Busybody, Lasher, etc etc etc.

Your theory fails on the facts. Bugger off.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

7. I can claim up and down that I believe one way, but if my actions indicate something else, how strongly do I truly believe in the ideal I purport to support?

Lance:

You purport to support The First Amendment....yet most everything you do here is at best a thinly veiled attempt to judge and control others thoughts and expressions....right down to spelling & grammar.

At the same time as you try to tell me how I think and what my values are, Ms Freedom of Expression.....you had all evidence of your values, points of view and positions....erased by Laurel in case anyone tried to use them against you in the future.

Sorry to burst your bubble, but repeated attacks in which you say I don't have particular values don't automatically make it so, Mein Fuhrer......and as you've said, you really don't know much about me

Your theory fails on the facts. Bugger off.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~

what a girl.
 
Indigo.Rose said:
There needs to be a moron award made just for you.

Again, very original.

Indigo.Rose, please explain... why do you feel like going thru all this abuse to defend Ginny's comment? I find this very odd. Lemme guess, you call homosexuals faggots, don't ya?

PBW
 
P. B. Walker said:
Yanno... I think you might be right... woman to woman peeing is somehow sexier :)

PBW


In my mind, the scene is set in a huge glass and marble enclosed shower, both heads running hot and steamy water all over her and I .... um, the other girl. One girl sits on the bench and the other stands up on it, either leg straddling her lover's thighs.

The girl on the bench looks up at her lover ... eyes locked, they both smile and with murmured voices and eyes half shut, one feels released and the other baptized.
 
sterlingclay said:
This thread was supposed to be about Lance, right? Here's my take on him, but first, this is why I hate him:

http://www.maximonline.com/grit/worst_job/images/photo.jpg

This clown appears whenever I do a picture search. If it weren't for Lance, I would have never noticed.

Lance is a master shit disturber. I respect his skills with the flare.

His debating skills are beyond most literoticans and I would have to attribute that to his Canadian citizenship. Our brand of humour is unmatched. Throw wit into an argument and a standard debaters are thrown for a loop.

But I do not follow him around like white on rice. ADD would not allow that. Recycled flames are boring after a while.



Wild how often that pic appears, isn't it?

Yes, Americans don't do humour in argument very well here.

PC does... of The Clique he might be the only one with a Canadian Humour Module.

I'm sure there's a Tennessee/Canada joke in that for someone to make...as long as they're not from West Virginia.

LC
 
Indigo.Rose said:
LOL yet another hypocritical rant. And now I'm a child molestor? Yet you're telling me I'm not saying anything of value? Yes, you're right, I'm about to tell you what a moron you are, yet again. Like I said, I just can't help myself, I've really never come across such abundant stupidity. Have you noticed that you're ranting again and again without me responding to your queries? It's not because I know you're right, it's becuase I've already answered it all. There is nothing left to say aside from how incredibly stupid you are.

I've invited you to post on my ignore thread, I really think it's teh only way I'm going to be able to get past your idiocy.
Hmmm, getting past someone elses idiocy. That should be hard to do when you can't see your own. Never come across so much abundant stupidity, hmm, must not own a mirror.
 
Back
Top