No orgasm.. would sex still be worth while?

[T.H. Oughts]

If you and your partner could not acheive an orgasm at all or get sexualy excited. Would you still have sex.....

Just a thought I had last night in afterglow....

 

[Kitte]

ok..let me clarify this...there is absolutly no physical pleasure to be gained by it... or is it just the absence of orgasm?

 

[MissTaken]

Umm I would.

But what is "afterglow?" It seems like a vague and fleeting memory. I just can't put my finger on it!

 

[zipman]

Even without an orgasm, it still is a damn good way to exercise.


Beats the hell out of aerobics

 

[T.H. Oughts]

ok..let me clarify this...there is absolutly no physical pleasure to be gained by it... or is it just the absence of orgasm?

You know you loved your partner... but not physical pleasure of the sexual kind....

 

[leavursmilin]

It sure would. I was on anti-depressants for about six months once. I really had to concentrate to be able to come and sometimes I couldn't. But I will tell you one thing, I sure as hell enjoyed trying.

 

[Kitte]

You know you loved your partner... but not physical pleasure of the sexual kind....

Well I love the way it feels when my partner touches me. Not always in a sexual way, the way his hand moves across my back as we are walking together, the way he brushes stray hairs across my face. I can only imagine that even being non sexual I would still love the feeling of him inside me. If just for the closeness...the connection, the total giving of oneself to another. So Im gonna say yes.

 

[T.H. Oughts]

If just for the closeness...the connection.

Cuddles and holding hands..... a lot less messy in the end.

 

[Aphrodisiac]

If you and your partner could not acheive an orgasm at all or get sexualy excited. Would you still have sex.....

His touch ... the way his warm breath tickles my skin... the feeling of him lying next to me. His sweet kisses ... the way he loves to bite my lower lip... his hands interwined in my hair ... the feel of his mouth upon mine .. the sound of his voice .. the look in his eyes when they meet mine ... his smile ... all the beauty that is him ...


Of course I would still have sex if there was no orgasm ...

 

[Kitte]

Cuddles and holding hands..... a lot less messy in the end.

But think of the symbolic nature of intercourse...the opening up of your body to someone. Physically letting them inside you. It is the closest you can get. I dont imagine it would be the thing dating is made of. Maybe in fact it would be appreciated as the true intimacy it is.

 

[Samuari]

If neither of us could even get excited, I don't think that the squeeze would be worth the juice. I doubt that the subject would even come up. what would be the point? We have all the children that we are ever going to have, and if there is no fun involved, sex becomes just so much excerise. However the joy of watching her orgasm would be sufiecent reward for me even if I was getting no direct benefit. I love watching her come.

For the last few years, Lady S has had a very low libido most of the time, and when she is in that condition, making love with her is more like masterbation. The only good thing about it is that I know that she is doing it because she loves me, but then that is what is what it is all about any way.

 

[deliciously_naughty]

I would, because I enjoy the physical connection as well. But i would certainly miss cumming

 

[T.H. Oughts]

But think of the symbolic nature of intercourse...the opening up of your body to someone. Physically letting them inside you. It is the closest you can get. I dont imagine it would be the thing dating is made of. Maybe in fact it would be appreciated as the true intimacy it is.

But isn't that built on the sexual tension that builds because you relate to the person so much.... remember no sexual awarness... just the fact you know you love the person and get wobbly knees and sweaty hands while you are near them...

The feeling we get from kissing is a sexual one, so no feeling of that....

 

[T.H. Oughts]

In the end if there was no sexual pleasure for both wouldn't the process of intercourse just be for making babies????

 

[T.H. Oughts]

The only good thing about it is that I know that she is doing it because she loves me, but then that is what is what it is all about any way.

Yes sometimes just knowing they are there for you is reward enough.

 

[Kitte]

But isn't that built on the sexual tension that builds because you relate to the person so much.... remember no sexual awarness... just the fact you know you love the person and get wobbly knees and sweaty hands while you are near them...

The feeling we get from kissing is a sexual one, so no feeling of that....

I think that is what I am saying. It is a non sexual thing to me when he makes certain physical gestures. No wobbly knees just more of a warm happy contented feeling. I think that with the option available to allow for the physical closeness I would take it...to be THAT physically close to the person I am so emotionally close to. But that may just be me. I mean there would be no hot and heavy oh yeah baby fuck me...but more of a symbol for the emotional intimacy.

 

[steve_perth]

oh yeah id do it for sure, the intimacy of having my cock deep inside her would be enough.

 

[T.H. Oughts]

oh yeah id do it for sure, the intimacy of having my cock deep inside her would be enough.

Yes, I think the intimacy would still be there wouldn't it. If sex was just for making babies we would not want to make them with just "anyone". So it would still be a form of intimacy that we would only allow the chosen one.....

 

[juicylips]

*BOOM*


This post will self destruct in 1 minute.

 

[steve_perth]

Yes, I think the intimacy would still be there wouldn't it. If sex was just for making babies we would not want to make them with just "anyone". So it would still be a form of intimacy that we would only allow the chosen one.....

It would definatly still be there. For example now after I've come and am still laying on top of her and not feeling particulary horny. I still love to stay there as long as possible with my cock inside her just for the feeling of closeness and intimacy. Its such a basic thing to do, and I think it would still be there for sure.

 

[T.H. Oughts]

It would definatly still be there. For example now after I've come and am still laying on top of her and not feeling particulary horny. I still love to stay there as long as possible with my cock inside her just for the feeling of closeness and intimacy. Its such a basic thing to do, and I think it would still be there for sure.

Yes but it is the feeling of "after orgasm" that makes you feel all warm and snuggly laying there on your partner....

 

[T.H. Oughts]

*BOOM*
This post will self destruct in 1 minute.

lol, yes it is a terrible thought.

 

[marksgirl]

If you and your partner could not acheive an orgasm at all or get sexualy excited. Would you still have sex.....

Just a thought I had last night in afterglow....

Just shoot me and put me out of my misery if that ever happens.

 

[Starfish]

I like to fuck.

 

[The Heretic]

I would certainly engage in sex even if I couldn't orgasm as it still feels good and is exciting. Indeed orgasm is almost an anti-climax to sex if you will excuse the pun. If both myself and I got no enjoyment from it at all, then no why do it if it isn't enjoyable?