Multiculturalism will be the death of us all

I see some people say, you take the best of each culture and make it yours; that is the traditional description of whay China does, not multiculturalism. That is what you got going on in Omaha where the fools want to RE-segragate themselves...

That's multi-culteralism, or Balkanization.

No good can come from it.

Only looks good in thesis form...
 
Cap’n AMatrixca said:
I see some people say, you take the best of each culture and make it yours; that is the traditional description of whay China does, not multiculturalism. That is what you got going on in Omaha where the fools want to RE-segragate themselves...

That's multi-culteralism, or Balkanization.

No good can come from it.

Only looks good in thesis form...

Hug a tree, sip some starbucks and listen to Air America with me.

Asshat.
 
Oliver Clozoff said:
it's hate speech to mention what people of other nations ought to be permitted to do?

Find me that statute, chucklenuts.


Don't ask me to do the work of the ACLU, I am not good at it...

;) ;)

I think your women ought to take their burkas off.

I find that offensive!

BOOM!
 
Cap’n AMatrixca said:
Don't ask me to do the work of the ACLU, I am not good at it...

;) ;)

I think your women ought to take their burkas off.

I find that offensive!

BOOM!

I suspect you're not good at much when it comes to the factual.

;) ;)
 
I see the inherent problem with defining some speech as "hate" speech in an attempt to separate it from rights afforded by Freedom of Speech.

But, let's face it: folks like Ish don't have to worry about facing this issue in real life, `cause they'd never have the balls to speak out when confronted in person anyhow. Nothing but armchair wannabe movers and shakers battling over the Internet.

Come back and complain once you've shed blood outdoors rather than Twinkie® bits all over your keyboard.
 
RoryN said:
I see the inherent problem with defining some speech as "hate" speech in an attempt to separate it from rights afforded by Freedom of Speech.

But, let's face it: folks like Ish don't have to worry about facing this issue in real life, `cause they'd never have the balls to speak out when confronted in person anyhow. Nothing but armchair wannabe movers and shakers battling over the Internet.

Come back and complain once you've shed blood outdoors rather than Twinkie® bits all over your keyboard.

thats because no one would engage with them in the real world.....

what happened to the KKK again.... oh yeah thats right.... no one takes them seriously either.
 
Mr.L.J.M said:
thats because no one would engage with them in the real world.....

They did at one time.

All that stolen lunch money was good for the economy, too.
 
Oliver Clozoff said:
I suspect you're not good at much when it comes to the factual.

;) ;)


No, I am not good at finding ways to be offended.

In the 60's we could say nigger and got along great with our black neighbors in our predominatly white, middle-European community. In the 70's we were shown a lot of hate and violence and were told to not use the "n" word. Now it's a crime to use the "n" word and we still get a lot of McKinney-ism; this is multi-culturalism. Of course I hit him, I am a black woman and you have to be sensitive to my fears and understand "why" I hit the officer. It was self-defense.

This is modern multi-culturalism. Hold me to the standards of my culture, not the law. Similarly, if aggregious human abuses occur in the name of Islam, ignore it. If they want to kill off the Jews, hey, man, cut them some slack, it's a 1800 year-old custom (for Islam, for Arabs and Persians in general we can go back about 4000 years...)!
 
RoryN said:
I see the inherent problem with defining some speech as "hate" speech in an attempt to separate it from rights afforded by Freedom of Speech.

But, let's face it: folks like Ish don't have to worry about facing this issue in real life, `cause they'd never have the balls to speak out when confronted in person anyhow. Nothing but armchair wannabe movers and shakers battling over the Internet.

Come back and complain once you've shed blood outdoors rather than Twinkie® bits all over your keyboard.


Can't speak for Ish, but I spent 20 years in the ring...
 
Cap’n AMatrixca said:
No, I am not good at finding ways to be offended.

In the 60's we could say nigger and got along great with our black neighbors in our predominatly white, middle-European community. In the 70's we were shown a lot of hate and violence and were told to not use the "n" word. Now it's a crime to use the "n" word and we still get a lot of McKinney-ism; this is multi-culturalism. Of course I hit him, I am a black woman and you have to be sensitive to my fears and understand "why" I hit the officer. It was self-defense.

This is modern multi-culturalism. Hold me to the standards of my culture, not the law. Similarly, if aggregious human abuses occur in the name of Islam, ignore it. If they want to kill off the Jews, hey, man, cut them some slack, it's a 1800 year-old custom (for Islam, for Arabs and Persians in general we can go back about 4000 years...)!

In what law is it permissible to kill Jews? WTF are you babbling about?
 
RoryN said:
They did at one time.

All that stolen lunch money was good for the economy, too.


hahaha....

nah nah, you have got it all wrong- they where the kids getting beaten up, that why they have all this bizzarre twisted misdirected hatred within them.
 
Cap’n AMatrixca said:
No, I am not good at finding ways to be offended.

In the 60's we could say nigger and got along great with our black neighbors in our predominatly white, middle-European community. In the 70's we were shown a lot of hate and violence and were told to not use the "n" word. Now it's a crime to use the "n" word and we still get a lot of McKinney-ism; this is multi-culturalism. Of course I hit him, I am a black woman and you have to be sensitive to my fears and understand "why" I hit the officer. It was self-defense.

This is modern multi-culturalism. Hold me to the standards of my culture, not the law. Similarly, if aggregious human abuses occur in the name of Islam, ignore it. If they want to kill off the Jews, hey, man, cut them some slack, it's a 1800 year-old custom (for Islam, for Arabs and Persians in general we can go back about 4000 years...)!

Psssst, you will get fired by using the term "black", so be careful.
 
Last edited:
RoryN said:


I'll say it to your face; I'm not hiding behind a keyboard.

What am I saying Ollie?

Multicultalism is a Liberal tool for the very things we won't do towards Islam, we do towards China. It's another "divide and conquer" political gimmick designed to keep us divided in camps based on anything other than the Constitution and Locke.
 
Joaquin1975 said:
Psssst, you wil get fired by using the term "black", so be careful.


The American Kennel Club threw me out for referring to my African-American Lab as a bitch...

The ACLU threatened them with a lawsuit.
 
Cap’n AMatrixca said:
The American Kennel Club threw me out for referring to my African-American Lab as a bitch...

The ACLU threatened them with a lawsuit.

Then make sure you call it bitch-american and you should be fine.
 
Cap’n AMatrixca said:
No law says it's okay to kill Jews, culture DEMANDS it.

And you think "multiculturalism" condones that?

You're just pissed because somebody made you stop saying "nigger" and now you want to ruin everybody's fun, dontcha, good ol' boy?
 
YES! I think multiculturalism condones it; peeps hasn't been gone that long if you want the staunchest voice for the elimination of Isreal to come back from the grave. Again, getting back to Kant and the school of thought that pervades our universities, you don't have the right, the basis, or the understanding to judge, all you can do is accept and understand.
 
Cap’n AMatrixca said:
YES! I think multiculturalism condones it; peeps hasn't been gone that long if you want the staunchest voice for the elimination of Isreal to come back from the grave. Again, getting back to Kant and the school of thought that pervades our universities, you don't have the right, the basis, or the understanding to judge, all you can do is accept and understand.

Do you even have a clue what you're talking about?

Kant's categorical imperative justifies absolute moral obligations (most notably the golden rule), not cultural relativism.

Where do you get your BS?
 
Back
Top