G
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
)sexy-girl said:is it really necessary that you try to insult me when you're debating with me ? ... i say "looking good" because a mink coat is a luxury item its not something needed to live
mink are wild animals their natural environment is in the wild
http://www.coyoteptmuseum.org/whats_new/wn_images/mink.jpg
that's what they are meant to look like ... i dont think they are exactly cute they are quite vicious creatures actually
55 mink is how many are used to make a single coat ... so you can't compared it as 1 mink 1 chicken
chickens are used for food and i only eat free range chickens they are also domesticated animals their natural environment is a free range farm
there are other ways to keep warm that work better then a mink coat ... and if you really need that fur look then get a fake fur coat in my opinion
nora ... i didn't start getting preachy until the pro fur people started... i gave my opinion that i didn't like fur and then i was joking with cheyenne ... i only started quoting facts once people started having a go at me for being anti-fur
sexy-girl said:
nora ... i didn't start getting preachy until the pro fur people started... i gave my opinion that i didn't like fur and then i was joking with cheyenne ... i only started quoting facts once people started having a go at me for being anti-fur
lavender said:
(Lance, you can know through various environmental checks what products do things just for "show" and which companies actually comply with their labeling. Being an active, informed consumer is a good thing)
Lancecastor said:Sg;
You were the one who raised a distinction in killing one species over another based on beauty, not me.
Lancecastor said:As for luxury vs necessity....try telling an Inuit person that fur coats aren't a necessity. As I said in my first post on the topic, there's nothing warmer (or sexier) than a fur coat.
Lancecastor said:Are you also suggesting there is a heirarchy of more "killable" animals based on level of domesticity and/or "free ranginess"?
A chicken's natural environment is a free range farm? (obviously you are unfamiliar with the Wild Chicken of Agnor)
sexy-girl said:no i didn't ... i said that people wear fur coats to look good ... that has nothing to do with how the animal looks
Lance: That's my point....so what if people kill animals to look good? A mink can become a fox's lunch or make you look hot....to the mink, well, he's still dead.
and the inuit use furs because they don't have access to an alternative ...
Lance: Bullshit. Inuit use fur because it is the warmest material and because it's part of their ecosystem-centric beliefs. As for your judgementalism about luxurity vs necessity, it's just that, judgemental. Remember, the mink dies anyway.
no im basing a hierarchy on if the animal is needed for food and therefore is required as a healthy diet compared to being killed for a luxury item
Lance: Who made you God? Mink production feeds lots of children with its profits. Lots of seal hunting families in Newfoundland & Labrador wound up in worse poverty than they'd been in before because of the wealthy Hollywood assholes that tried killing the seal industry.
i merely brought up the fact of the level of domestication because clearly a wild animal such as a mink wouldn't be happy in a tiny cage when its normal environment is many square miles ... were a chicken would be quite happy on a free range farm
Lance: Happy mink, yes, Happy chickens, I know. Should it be illegal for people to live in apartments, driven to big expensive cities by their enslavement to capitalism?
as for a wild chicken that is a different species to a farm chicken of course
Lance: Says who? And shouldn't then the great wild chiken be even more aceptable to kill because of all the space it gets?
lance you are a very hard work to debate with... you pick a few words i say and then twist them and then you ignore many of the facts i say because you can't argue with them
Lance: Thank you. Some of what you say is of courtse, pure twaddle, so I don't comment on it. Why you've never even SEEN a herd of wild chickens, have you?
I still think you secretly want a mink.
Sandia said:
Other animals are in between - chickens, for example.
sexy-girl said:lance i choose to disagree with you ... i've said my part

april-wine said:Hey you can't do that........There has to be a long drawn out arguement.....Nasty words flying.....Lance thinking he has the upper hand.........Come onnnnnnnnn that's how the game is played around here........![]()
![]()

sexy-girl said:maybe if i didn't have a rotten cold i would
seriously though there is no hard feelings with lance ... i disagree with him but i disagree with lots of people so its fine
i know sometimes no matter what you say you're not going to change someones mind ... and that isn't always a bad thing its just life

sexy-girl said:lance i choose to disagree with you ... i've said my part
april-wine said:OK let's snuggle........![]()
![]()

Sandia said:The morality of killing is based on consciousness, need, and suffering. Killing bugs, for example, is pretty easy, because they have no consciousness - they don't suffer. (I don't think...)