Michigan, Workers must not have a choice! Vote Union

[mercury14]

I didn't cite any specific court decision. I only cited the DOL on Affirmative Action and a law textbook that describes what judges can do if they believe an employer is discriminating. The latter are strictly decisions made by individual judgres, not juries, and the burden of proof is generally on the employer who has been accused. These are civil matters, not criminl ones, so words such as "guilty" would not apply.

I included these citations strictly to refute a statement made by Sgt. in Post 304.

You said that judges will step in if a company's workforce is racially imbalanced, however that is not true. And nothing in your links suggests that it's true. What source are you using for your facts?

As far as adjudication, who do you think is the accuser?

 

[Boxlicker101]

You said that judges will step in if a company's workforce is racially imbalanced, however that is not true. And nothing in your links suggests that it's true. What source are you using for your facts?

As far as adjudication, who do you think is the accuser?

I never said anything about judges stepping in, which would imply taking action on their own. The complainant, or accuser, would probably be the ACLU or, possibly, the NAACP or some similar group, which would be representing an individual who claimed he or she had been discriminated against. Or, it could be some kind of class action suit brought by one of those groups.

 

[jeninflorida]

people agree that government workers need a union to protect their terrorist network.

yet who will protect the American people if even government workers are not safe?