3113
Hello Summer!
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2005
- Posts
- 13,823
It was argued in the Fatherhood thread that there was an inherent unfairness in a woman's ability to terminate a fetus without the father's concent. I pointed out that the woman is risking her life. However safe pregnancy is, women can still die from it, can end up hospitalized for any number of serious complications, etc.. It is my belief that going through 9 months of unforseen complications (including psychological and hormonal) should be voluntary.
As the man is at no such risk, he doesn't get the choice.
Whether you agree with this or not, it does seem that the only way to make the situation truly fair is for men to be able to take the same risk. To take on the baby and carry it to term if the woman doesn't want to.
So now I'm wondering: Gentlemen. If medical science gets there, would you want to carry a child to term? Give birth to it (Cesarian section)?
Researching the topic, I found one faux website claiming that a man's preggers...and many articles saying that male pregnancy is a loooooong way off. But I did find this interesting subtext:
Pregnancy & Men
Seems men tune into their pregnant partners and sometimes follow along very closely, hormonally as well as psychologically and emotionally.
As the man is at no such risk, he doesn't get the choice.
Whether you agree with this or not, it does seem that the only way to make the situation truly fair is for men to be able to take the same risk. To take on the baby and carry it to term if the woman doesn't want to.
So now I'm wondering: Gentlemen. If medical science gets there, would you want to carry a child to term? Give birth to it (Cesarian section)?
Researching the topic, I found one faux website claiming that a man's preggers...and many articles saying that male pregnancy is a loooooong way off. But I did find this interesting subtext:
Pregnancy & Men
Seems men tune into their pregnant partners and sometimes follow along very closely, hormonally as well as psychologically and emotionally.