Meghan Markle

Who's the daddy

From left to right
Prince Charles, Prince Harry, James Hewitt (Diana's lover)
 
The job description is no mystery: shut up, smile, and cut ribbons. Plenty would gladly wear a stiff upper lip and do the job if they’re not up to it. What Harry, Meghan, and Diana never grasped is that this isn’t about celebrity and privilege. It’s about duty and service to the nation and community. Something bigger than yourself. Yes, racism is abhorrent, but so is constant pleas for privacy while hypocritically seeking attention at every turn. Do the job or give up the status. You can’t have it both ways.
 
I wonder if anyone asked Diana how ginger her child might be?

MM is no longer claiming that they asked her about the colour of her baby. She now says that Harry overheard a person she refuses to name, "because that would make it difficult for them," say it to another party who is also nameless. He, Harry, only told her about it after Archie was born.

As for Harry, well, there are no gingers in the royal family and Diana was blonde. The affair with James Hewitt took place while she was still married to Charles and before Harry was born. It was also before she went on TV claiming "There are three people in this marriage," referring to Camilla.
 
Last edited:
Another twist of the truth.
Oprah.
"What do you live on"
Harry
" I have some money my mother left me"

He also has Millions that his Great Grandmother, the queen's mother, left him. He also has been recieving £5.6 Million a year from the Grand Duchy of Cornwall, his father's estate. (This years accounts have yet to be published so that was the case up to April2020). He was also receiving £0.6 million from the British taxpayer up to that time. Charles gave him £5 Million from his personal fortune when he moved to the USA. But apparently all that counts as nothing and he is forced to live off his inheritance from his mother.
 
Actually, the undisputed timeline of James Hewitt and Diana begins about 2 years after Harry's birth, her family has redheads and boyhood pictures of Charles and Harry are very similar...plus, I think Harry looks a lot like his paternal grandfather and appears to share his manly-man-rebellious nature.

And sure, Harry has money...it's just not unlimited anymore.
 
It is obvious that several people that are bitching here...never watched the interview
 
I don't get along with my parents (fucking Fascist Trump supporters) nor my inlaws ( fucking tree huggers). So I guess I am a Diva too
 
Markle is a manipulative, lying cunt playing the race and mental health cards.

Harry is a Spencer through and through. Emotionally needy and a drama queen, trotting out his mother's death repeatedly for sympathy.

Piers Morgan can be annoying but for what he said this week I'd suck his dick harder than a top of the range Dyson.
 
Markle is a manipulative, lying cunt playing the race and mental health cards.

Harry is a Spencer through and through. Emotionally needy and a drama queen, trotting out his mother's death repeatedly for sympathy.

Yes, Harry to me came across the worst. Ineffectual, poor me And fame-hungry.

Meghan -- I don't know... I never liked her (saw her as a narcissist) but she DID encounter awful bullying/ smearing and lies from the press. I would be just as self-absorbed & keen to get my story out.

What I didn't like about Oprah, tho was her tendency to conflate the Royal family with the Press.
Yes, the family Can be accused of inaction, maybe a bit of racism, but in no way as awful and close to how the press regularly bullied Royals, Meghan in particular.
Woopy Goldberg had the best attitude on The View - "we're all prejudiced and racists, how can we move ahead.

Piers Morgan can be annoying but for what he said this week I'd suck his dick harder than a top of the range Dyson.

lol you go girl.

What also annoys me is the cohort of American people of color who are now advocating "Off with the Monarchy".
It's none of their business, it's not Their country.

By contrast, the British poc seem to have a more appropriate response. (either support or criticize the monarchy, but in a constructive way.
 
What also arose my curiosity was that Harry was dumped twice prior to Meghan.
Who on Earth would dump a Prince?
Maybe they found him to be a bit of a covert narcissist beneath it all?
Honestly, to me Meghan came across as much better.
 
What also arose my curiosity was that Harry was dumped twice prior to Meghan.
Who on Earth would dump a Prince?
Maybe they found him to be a bit of a covert narcissist beneath it all?
Honestly, to me Meghan came across as much better.

He's not the only Prince who has been dumped repeatedly. Unlike Meghan most of the women found out what their lives would be like if they married a Prince and sensibly decided that the pressure would be too much.

Meghan apparently didn't know. If so, she was either stupid because any google search would have told her, or she wanted to change Harry's role from the start.

PS. If the latter, it would explain her differences with the Royal family. She intended to detach Harry from his royal duties and worked to make them impossible. Was she that devious? If so, it would explain why she wanted the Oprah interview before the marriage, so that Harry had no way back.
 
Last edited:
I don't see that part in the same way.

Yes, Meghan had unrealistic expectations in the start, yes she might have been rude or demanding of staff, but she was new, and with repeated experience, she would have matured and changed her behavior.

And I empathise with the part of her grievance in which she complained about the harassment by the press, and the Royal family's inaction.
That other Royal family members went through that to some degree, doesn't cut it. Why should she put up with bullying and harassment?

Meghan apparently didn't know. If so, she was either stupid because any google search would have told her, or she wanted to change Harry's role from the start.

PS. If the latter, it would explain her differences with the Royal family. She intended to detach Harry from his royal duties and worked to make them impossible. Was she that devious? If so, it would explain why she wanted the Oprah interview before the marriage, so that Harry had no way back.


But the more I think about the interview and listen to people, the more I find the interview to be grotesque and immature.
They went ovee the top in attacking their own
And the "they took our titles and money"
-- it's unclear to me whether it was driven by narcissistic entitlement, or by genuine fear for their/Archie's lives/need for security.

The interview, imo was a grotesque fail and Oprah is at main fault because the interviewer shapes it, and it came across as a narcissistic fest.
I have no idea why everybody's kissing Oprah's ass "masterful" etc.
 
Back
Top