Litiquette

[BreezySnow]

Breezy you are just normal with your reflections. There are many on Lit/chat that say things just for a reaction and there are others that are sincere. Those are the ones that are your friends Hope you have an awesome day.

Thanks cole! I avoid the ones who just want a reaction, or at least try to. I hope you have an awesome day also!

 

[Lord Pmann]

So... Seeing as I haven't hijacked your thread in over an hour...


I give you this...

100 best boobs ever

Thanks for the list! However, I've got to question a list that has Halle Berry's boobs ranked higher than Kate Upton's. And I didn't see Kim Kardashian on there at all. And she might be less intelligent than a a sack of wet mice, but she has amazing breasts. I'd be curious to know the scientific method for said poll.

 

[Violetvixen1]

Thanks for the list! However, I've got to question a list that has Halle Berry's boobs ranked higher than Kate Upton's. And I didn't see Kim Kardashian on there at all. And she might be less intelligent than a a sack of wet mice, but she has amazing breasts. I'd be curious to know the scientific method for said poll.

I'm all for scientific method! Would you like to set up the parameters for our own list? LOL

 

[cole4258]

I'm all for scientific method! Would you like to set up the parameters for our own list? LOL

Scientific? As in feel, suck n bounce test?

<Volunteers

 

[BreezySnow]

Scientific? As in feel, suck n bounce test?

<Volunteers

Should be all natural also!

 

[Violetvixen1]

Scientific? As in feel, suck n bounce test?

<Volunteers

I'll be right there with ya! I call Head boob judge!!!

 

[vibes]

I'll be right there with ya! I call Head boob judge!!!

You'll need a second opinion huh

 

[Lord Pmann]

I'm all for scientific method! Would you like to set up the parameters for our own list? LOL

Yes. Yes I would. *stay tuned*

 

[cole4258]

I'll be right there with ya! I call Head boob judge!!!

You are aware that this could take some time right???

Have to get things right.

 

[Lord Pmann]

I'm all for scientific method! Would you like to set up the parameters for our own list? LOL

Being a man of science, I have decided to take up VV's offer to set up scientific guidelines by which we shall judge the Chesticular Prowess (CP).

Many things must be considered here. Size, proportion, authenticity, shape, direction, etc. I'm open to suggestions.

1. Size. Many people, long ago, thought that the following formula held true when grading CP:

(.)(.) > (.)(.)

This was a widely accepted theory. We now know that this has been debunked, like other theories such as a flat earth or the earth as the center of the universe.

Typically, large is a good way to go. They are good for grabbing, fucking, sucking, etc. However, this is not always the case. A more recently accepted conditional formula is the following:

(.)(.) > (.)(.), with the following conditions:
(.)(.) < two ripe watermelons
(.)(.) < or = Kate Hudson

This helps account for the breasts that are large enough to smother a man and allows for smaller breasts to win in such a competition.

2. Proportion. I can't stress this enough and it needs to be considered when looking at size. Do they match the frame of the host?

Also, is Left Boob (LB) approximately equal to the size or Right Boob (RB)?

LB = RB + or - 6.9% is the accepted formula in the US.

3. Titty Authenticity. Simple. Are they real? Some fake breasts are fabulous looking. Tiffani Amber Theissan comes to mind. However, for purposes of our scientific study and list, they will not be considered. The equations become much more complex when considering real versus imaginary numbers. I think everyone agrees

√1 = 1 is much easier to analyze than √-1 = i

4. Shape. Not enough can be said about this. Are they full? Tear dropped shaped? Pancake? Rocks in socks? Knee knockers? Preference is always given to an abundant presence.

5. Direction. Are they parallel? Hammerheads? What is the angle of their dangle?

A nice set of breasts is separated by a small about of space (to avoid uniboobage) and are near, but not exactly parallel.

If LB || RB, then you may have a rocks in socks syndrome. There is typically a desired angle represented by the following:

5<angle of deviation<18

I won't address the hammerheads here, as it's obvious that is less than desired. It is much more prevalent in the fake titties of the the species. There have been, however, sightings in the natural.

These are my thoughts for our own list. Thorough enough? Feel free to add.

I certainly have my own ideas for who should make the list.

(Pardon any typos)

 

[Violetvixen1]

Being a man of science, I have decided to take up VV's offer to set up scientific guidelines by which we shall judge the Chesticular Prowess (CP).

Many things must be considered here. Size, proportion, authenticity, shape, direction, etc. I'm open

*snip*

(Pardon any typos)

Pmann- you're my hero!!! *sits down to formulate checklist*

 

[BreezySnow]

Being a man of science, I have decided to take up VV's offer to set up scientific guidelines by which we shall judge the Chesticular Prowess (CP).

Many things must be considered here. Size, proportion, authenticity, shape, direction, etc. I'm open to suggestions.

......

These are my thoughts for our own list. Thorough enough? Feel free to add.

I certainly have my own ideas for who should make the list.

(Pardon any typos)

Ummm, obviously someone has put a lot of thought into this!!! lol

 

[ChainedUp]

As much as I enjoy a great pair of boobs, things seem to have jumped the rails again. I know I can be a killjoy but I really would like the conversations here to be related to the topic of the day or another Litiquette related topic. Thanks for understanding.

 

[Lord Pmann]

As much as I enjoy a great pair of boobs, things seem to have jumped the rails again. I know I can be a killjoy but I really would like the conversations here to be related to the topic of the day or another Litiquette related topic. Thanks for understanding.

My apologies. It's just... Well, boobs.

 

[ChainedUp]

My apologies. It's just... Well, boobs.

No need to apologize, I totally get that logic!

 

[Lord Pmann]

As to keep this thread pure and derail no more with my booby research, I have placed a thread here:

http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?p=56894634#post56894634

Again, my apologies for the derailing of this thread. Shameful that two days in a row it has meandered.

*places thread back on tracks*

 

[ChainedUp]

With post 5000 (well make that post 5001 )I just wanted to thank everyone for their participation and for the 60,000+ views. I thought this would be just a place we'd bitch about posting antics and that it'd last a couple weeks. You all have turned it into much more. I enjoy putting the topics out and reading everyone's thoughts. Thanks again !!!

 

[Lord Pmann]

With post 5000 (well make that post 5001 )I just wanted to thank everyone for their participation and for the 60,000+ views. I thought this would be just a place we'd bitch about posting antics and that it'd last a couple weeks. You all have turned it into much more. I enjoy putting the topics out and reading everyone's thoughts. Thanks again !!!

It's a good thread and, even though I've just started reading it, it's one of very few I read on a regular basis.

 

[makinmepurr]

Well, this place went off the rails yesterday, that's for sure. Remember the post about having control of your day, now that was a funny one. It's Friday and time to reflect on the week that was. Do you ever reflect on things here or is Lit just an "in the moment" type of place where once it's past, it's past?

Well, I' ve said it before, Lit is more than just fantasy for me, and I often find myself thinking about my friends here, and situations that arise. One especially funny exchange I saw in the threads just popped into my head yesterday as I was driving to work and I burst out laughing. That kind of thing happens to me all the time.
And congrats on 5,000 posts, Chained.
I still think you should wear that sheriff getup....hawt!!!

 

[Mindfondler]

With post 5000 (well make that post 5001 )I just wanted to thank everyone for their participation and for the 60,000+ views.

I'm not surprised that the Litiquette thread has reached those milestone counts. It drew my attention early on, and since then I have made sure that I keep up with it, even when I don't have anything worthwhile to post in it.

Unlike many of the "fluff" threads that are full of one line postings (or even one word ones), I think this one deserves a little celebration for reaching 5000 posts of a (mostly) substantial nature. Well done to Chained for starting it, and to all contributors for sustaining it.

I enjoy putting the topics out and reading everyone's thoughts.

Whoa! Stop that!
.

 

[ChainedUp]

Whoa! Stop that!
.

Don't take my superpower away

 

[jackflash81]

Don't take my superpower away

Super power? Where's the cloak??

and the mask?

 

[ChainedUp]

Nope, I've got nothing to hide

 

[Thandi]

With post 5000 (well make that post 5001 )I just wanted to thank everyone for their participation and for the 60,000+ views. I thought this would be just a place we'd bitch about posting antics and that it'd last a couple weeks. You all have turned it into much more. I enjoy putting the topics out and reading everyone's thoughts. Thanks again !!!

Had to come and wish my Lit Bestie congrats on over 5,000 posts on the best thread here.
You have managed to keep it interesting and provocative, and so much thought has gone into it. Excellent job Chained!!!

(Now I'm pretty sure someone said something about either chaps & a cowboy hat...or a cape and mask...waiting...)

 

[ChainedUp]

Had to come and wish my Lit Bestie congrats on over 5,000 posts on the best thread here.
You have managed to keep it interesting and provocative, and so much thought has gone into it. Excellent job Chained!!!

(Now I'm pretty sure someone said something about either chaps & a cowboy hat...or a cape and mask...waiting...)

Thanks for coming out of retirement for the message. Always great to have a Lit bestie return.