G
Guest
Guest
Sub Joe said:If it weren't for the quotation marks, I would have guessed that you also have a piece of crap Zanussi.
I'd never call him that. Not in a million years.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sub Joe said:If it weren't for the quotation marks, I would have guessed that you also have a piece of crap Zanussi.
ABSTRUSE said:You lie like a rug, that's right, just keep paddling that canoe down to Smut town you tramp.
Tatelou said:I'd never call him that. Not in a million years.
Yes, you too.....it's a two person canoe.Sub Joe said:I hope you were talking to me. I'm going to pretend you were.
neonlyte said:You don't think the Pre-Raphaelites sent back the advancement of Victorian women just a little? All that romantacised imagery, manly pursuits like the Arts and Crafts movement. A tinge subversive, objectifying and portraying women largely as beautiful, to be an adornment. Madox Brown was singular in portraying 'life in the raw' (Work), though even he had to resort to 'beautifying' to survive as an artist.
The Pre-Raphaelites were the cinematographers of their day, distributing eye candy pictures to the municipalities of England for edification of the urban masses.
Dndjsp said:Hermione
Harry
Ron
Fred
George
Draco
Lucius
Dumbledore
McGonnagal
Madame Pomfrey
Hagrid
Hedwig
Dudley Dursley
Uncle Vernon
Aunt Petunia
Sirius Black
Percy
Neville Longbottom
Professor Flitwick
Cornelius Fudge
Dementor
ABSTRUSE said:You lie like a rug, that's right, just keep paddling that canoe down to Smut town you tramp.
BlackShanglan said:As a prelude to the Symbolists, they objectify pretty much everything. It's all about beauty and not about realism. I think the real test of any gender oppression issue is disparity; I'd argue that in the Pre-Raphs there's no more than in the rest of Victorian society. Indeed, given their propensity for sensual and powerful female figures in comparison to the pristine virgins of much of the rest of the time, some women might have found them positively liberating. I can't say that I see them as distinctly more rough on women than on men, or at all any worse than the world around them.
But that's just one horse's perspective.
The Dead Milkmen and Pre-Raphs??? God I love you...let's run off now and live happily ever after.BlackShanglan said:As a prelude to the Symbolists, they objectify pretty much everything. It's all about beauty and not about realism. I think the real test of any gender oppression issue is disparity; I'd argue that in the Pre-Raphs there's no more than in the rest of Victorian society. Indeed, given their propensity for sensual and powerful female figures in comparison to the pristine virgins of much of the rest of the time, some women might have found them positively liberating. I can't say that I see them as distinctly more rough on women than on men, or at all any worse than the world around them.
But that's just one horse's perspective.

BlackShanglan said:As a prelude to the Symbolists, they objectify pretty much everything. It's all about beauty and not about realism. I think the real test of any gender oppression issue is disparity; I'd argue that in the Pre-Raphs there's no more than in the rest of Victorian society. Indeed, given their propensity for sensual and powerful female figures in comparison to the pristine virgins of much of the rest of the time, some women might have found them positively liberating. I can't say that I see them as distinctly more rough on women than on men, or at all any worse than the world around them.
But that's just one horse's perspective.
neonlyte said:I'm afraid mine was the view of a cynic who had too many years of the pre-Raphs through Architecture School, then when I finished, I ended up living 2 minutes walk from William Morris's Red House. The whole Arts and Crafts movement weighed heavily on Victorian and Post-Victorian architecture, and rarely in a pretty way. That and being wed to a 'modern artist' (strictly non-figurative) excuses my view![]()
There are other reasons as you mention, but not for this thread.
Can I ride you bareback now? feed you apples and brush your mane??? Eliot too???..........sighBlackShanglan said:I enjoy your perspective, Neonlyte. (Sorry, threw myself there as I nearly put your name.) In the interest of full disclosure - are you reading, Abs? - I have my own bias. I'm a passionate lover of the Decadence, and the Pre-Raphs are the roots of it. True, one really had to have Pater, but it's hard to miss Rossetti's contribution as well. He's a quirky, strange, and times awful creature, is Dante ... but without him, so much else falls apart. Something perhaps like Pound - I loathe the man (although I have to bow to some of his poems), but I couldn't sacrifice Eliot to get rid of him.
Shanglan

ABSTRUSE said:Can I ride you bareback now? feed you apples and brush your mane??? Eliot too???..........sigh![]()
And I will recite Dowson to you as you do.I have to agree with you here. I hate Rossetti and love him at the same time. He's the guy who treats you like crap, but you can't stop fucking. The whole movement is filled with bad boys and shrinking violets. It's sort of a brilliant soap opera that's better than fiction. As far as the Arts and Crafts era goes, they really made some ugly stuff, but don't throw away those hammered copper ashtrays, they're worth a small fortune.BlackShanglan said:I enjoy your perspective, Neonlyte. (Sorry, threw myself there as I nearly put your name.) In the interest of full disclosure - are you reading, Abs? - I have my own bias. I'm a passionate lover of the Decadence, and the Pre-Raphs are the roots of it. True, one really had to have Pater, but it's hard to miss Rossetti's contribution as well. He's a quirky, strange, and times awful creature, is Dante ... but without him, so much else falls apart. Something perhaps like Pound - I loathe the man (although I have to bow to some of his poems), but I couldn't sacrifice Eliot to get rid of him.
Shanglan
Sub Joe said:I guess this is a bad time to say I find long-haired redheads hot.
I've heard.elsol said:In fact, long-haired redheads are the little known secret weakness of most men... just ask around.
Sincerely,
ElSol
vella_ms said:
- tomato sauce
- mushrooms
- onions
- tomato paste
- sam adams
- break
- sex
- sex
- sex
- sex
didnt forget, hunk o hunk o burning lurvelil_elvis said:You forgot:
- Gloat
- Gloat
- Gloat
vella_ms said:didnt forget, hunk o hunk o burning lurve
i just thought i would be less conspicuous....
howevah...now that you mention it
- GOAT
- GOAT
- GOAT
meheheheheheSub Joe said:Are they gruff?