Let's talk about guns, shootings, solutions and idiotic suggestions

[LukSkyFokker]

Of course. Law and order includes due process.

Due process? Pfft. 45 wanted to take your penis substitutes long before due process and you loved him for saying that anti-American shit.

 

[jaF0]

So, all of you law and order types ... bound by state laws, states rights over Federal law. ....


If you STATE enacted a law outlawing certain types of weapons and required owners to turn them in ..... would you comply?

Taps foot ....

 

[JohnnySavage]

They buy up armor piercing bullets, high-capacity magazines, bump stocks and every other accessory at risk of becoming illegal, so no. They may never use them, but they can’t be without them.

And people like you buy up "action figures" and never take them out of the box to play with them.

 

[pecksniff]

And people like you buy up "action figures" and never take them out of the box to play with them.

They lose half their value if you take them out of the packaging!

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

Due process? Pfft. 45 wanted to take your penis substitutes long before due process and you loved him for saying that anti-American shit.

No worries. Still got ‘em. Be safe. Wear orange.

 

[UltraMAGAKing]

Due process? Pfft. 45 wanted to take your penis substitutes long before due process and you loved him for saying that anti-American shit.

Nothing anti-American about due process and considering that's red flag laws, I'm glad you're seeing how anti-American Democrats are.

 

[pecksniff]

Nothing anti-American about due process and considering that's red flag laws, I'm glad you're seeing how anti-American Democrats are.

Red flag laws are not any breach of due process.

 

[phrodeau]

And people like you buy up "action figures" and never take them out of the box to play with them.

Nothing illegal in that.

It’s as if I point out that you ran a red light, and you reply, “Oh yeah? Well, you ran a green light!”

 

[butters]

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/g...sedgntp&cvid=5efd402f613340b29ef0fbb846229764

 

[pecksniff]

You know, in most towns in the Old West, if you came to town armed, you had to check your gun with the sheriff. It was not the libertarian free-for-all of popular imagination.

Apart from the Indian wars, life in the Old West was really not all that violent. A cowboy was far more likely to be dragged to death by his horse than to die in a gunfight. The whole legend of the West was a media creation even at the time -- people in the Tame East went to Wild West shows and read dime novels about gunslingers, while the real people out west got on with their ranching and farming and mining.

 

[Dribble]

Why an ex-police officer bought an AR, and why he no longer needs it....and most importantly why he thinks they are useless as a home protection device. Opinions like this are common among sane people. It is the insane ones that are the issue. Seems like an easy way of identifying stupid people to me.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/05/opinions/guns-ar-15-uvalde-school-shooting-fanone/index.html

 

[IrezumiKiss]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1534275573064814593

 

[HisArpy]

Why an ex-police officer bought an AR, and why he no longer needs it....and most importantly why he thinks they are useless as a home protection device. Opinions like this are common among sane people. It is the insane ones that are the issue. Seems like an easy way of identifying stupid people to me.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/05/opinions/guns-ar-15-uvalde-school-shooting-fanone/index.html

The insane part is that you believe that 1 person's experiences which agree with your own mindset are somehow more sensible than the experiences of those who don't agree with your mindset.

Take out the hyperbolic anti-gun words and insert "gum" in their place and see where your argument gets you. Doublemint or Fruit Stripe, which packs more bad breath stopping power? Nobody needs more than 1 pack of gum for dating. Carrying gum in public is dangerous. Only the police should have access to gum.

Anti-gun arguments are projections and fallacies. Of course the pro-gun arguments are the same but what the anti-gun messaging fails to acknowledge from the outset is that we have a 2nd Amendment.

Chew on that.

 

[ll74]

The insane part is that you believe that 1 person's experiences which agree with your own mindset are somehow more sensible than the experiences of those who don't agree with your mindset.

Typically, when someone agrees with a perspective, it becomes more important to them then those that don't. Logic. He's not said that the perspective is more or less valid than any other.

 

[HisArpy]

Typically, when someone agrees with a perspective, it becomes more important to them then those that don't. Logic. He's not said that the perspective is more or less valid than any other.

Logic requires that one examine all of the facts without bias. When one chooses to favor one side of an issue without considering ANY facts except those of favoritism, one cannot be said to have acted logically in any fashion.

BTW, choosing sides IS in fact saying that one argument has more validity than the other.

 

[ll74]

Logic requires that one examine all of the facts without bias. When one chooses to favor one side of an issue without considering ANY facts except those of favoritism, one cannot be said to have acted logically in any fashion.

BTW, choosing sides IS in fact saying that one argument has more validity than the other.

Posting one point of view is not indicative that any others have been ignored.

The issue is not binary. Validity and effectiveness are not the same thing. One can dismiss a valid perspective because the approach is not effective to address the problem.

 

[HisArpy]

Posting one point of view is not indicative that any others have been ignored.

The issue is not binary. Validity and effectiveness are not the same thing. One can dismiss a valid perspective because the approach is not effective to address the problem.

Bwaahahahaha...

You really are a fucking turd mentally.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Bwaahahahaha...

You really are a fucking turd mentally.

^^^THIS is your reply? Small wonder your legal career has not been very successful.

 

[pecksniff]

Logic requires that one examine all of the facts without bias.

No, it doesn't. The concept of logic is much, much narrower than that. (Spock is always misusing the word, saying "logic" where he should say "reason".)

 

[coati]

Anti-gun arguments are projections and fallacies. Of course the pro-gun arguments are the same but what the anti-gun messaging fails to acknowledge from the outset is that we have a 2nd Amendment.

Chew on that.

Indeed, all of these mass murderers and two-bit armed punks are part of our well-regulated militia, so they're totally covered by the founding cult fathers in 2A.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

https://i.imgur.com/iGa6KBY.png

https://i.imgur.com/gJwt0Jh.png

https://i.imgur.com/c4fy4L2.png

https://i.imgur.com/3ZrQblS.png

 

[IrezumiKiss]

https://i.imgur.com/0hfEuOZ.png

#SameOldSong

 

[ll74]

I'm sure they would've killed just as many with a chair

 

[Dribble]

https://www.cnn.com/videos/opinions/2022/06/08/retired-marine-gun-control-opinion-orig-jm-dp.cnn

This is a fair logical step.

 

[UltraMAGAKing]

Why an ex-police officer bought an AR, and why he no longer needs it....and most importantly why he thinks they are useless as a home protection device. Opinions like this are common among sane people. It is the insane ones that are the issue. Seems like an easy way of identifying stupid people to me.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/05/opinions/guns-ar-15-uvalde-school-shooting-fanone/index.html

Irrational fear doesn't make a person sane.

Take the Caliber away from the argument and the guy is flat on his face full of shit about home defense.