Is this pic of Kathy Lee Gifford A fake?

[Marxist]

http://www.kingdomcom.com/kathienipples.gif

It just doesn't seem possible that she'd go on air like that and no one would say anything. But it sure doesn't look like a fake, does it?

 

[red_rose]

Probably just enhanced...

She may have been a bit nipply that morning, so someone decided to give it some color.

 

[Moi]

I once saw a picture of Kathy Lee getting a standing ovation.
Clearly it was faked....

 

[brokenbrainwave]

from the angle of her stare, you reckon ole Reg had a stiffy??

 

[jass1960]

But it sure doesn't look like a fake, does it?

No not at all - I for one think that it is a real picture

 

[DéjàNu]

maybe they got that case on the Fake detective website

http://www.fake-detective.com/index.html

very cool website

 

[Rubyfruit]

Nice tits.

 

[Marxist]

Not a fake exactly but an enhancement of large proportions:
http://www.fake-detective.com/book-03/case249.jpg



Thanks Deja.

 

[Rubyfruit]

I can't believe she went braless on national tv.

I wont even go get my mail without a bra on.

 

[jass1960]

Not a fake exactly but an enhancement of large proportions:


Thanks Deja.

...And I thought you were intelligent!

 

[DéjàNu]

Thanks Deja.

You are most welcome Marxist.... be careful on the Fake detective website we can lost ourself a couples of hours out there.


I know I have.

 

[Marxist]

...And I thought you were intelligent!

Your av looks like Purple Haze on a bad day.

 

[Shy Tall Guy]

Well, given the original, I wouldn't say it was fake, even though the dupe is slightly different. Why? Because differences in cameras or capture boards can easily result in the contast and brightness difference, and who is to say that the original was how she really appeared? It depends on the way the TV is setup (brightness, contrast, etc.) and so on.

OTOH, it could very well be fake, both of them could be. I have a hard time believing either one is real; surely she knew what it looked like before she went on the air? Such photos are easy to fake, especially with the poor quality of the original.

Which reminds me of a couple of things about pics here on Lit.:

1) Simple pic manipulation, such as inverting the colors as one member did with some very risque pics in on her member page, is not going to keep people from seeing the original photo and identifying you. I took that pic and in 5 seconds I had inverted it again to show the positive real world colors. If you ware going to do such manipulation, make sure it is something that is not easily reversable, or better yet, just blur the face. I often take pics from Lit. and run them through Photoshop and lighten them up quite a bit so I can see details.

2) A lot of member pics have been showing up lately in various threads and that is great, but look at the file names before you upload them okay? Some of these pics have your real first name in them, one maybe even had a real last name, but I think it was a location not a name. If you want to keep your name and identity confidential, don't use pics that give away both your face and name.

 

[badasschick]

What about this one?






http://www.famous-nudes.com/ac/acvf.6283329/FN/kathy-lee/kathylee.jpg

 

[jass1960]

Your av looks like Purple Haze on a bad day.

no it's him on a good day

 

[jass1960]

What about this one?






http://www.famous-nudes.com/ac/acvf.6283329/FN/kathy-lee/kathylee.jpg

thats a fake - we all know she ain't got legs