Is race based congressional redistricting coming to an end?

[Rebel5soul]

She’s proving to be a disgrace to the Court, easily on track to become the most partisan and least intellectually grounded Justice in modern history. Her opinions are guided not by law, precedent, or constitutional reasoning, but by emotion and ideology. She argues from how she wishes the law were, not how it is. In truth, she’d make a far better politician than a judge.

She's getting openly mocked by the other justices.

 

[icanhelp1]

Sounds like you believe race-based gerrymandering should remain indefinitely.

What party gains an advantage in raced based gerrymandering? Asking for a friend.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

What party gains an advantage in raced based gerrymandering? Asking for a friend.

The one that some say could lose up to 19 House seats if SCOTUS strikes it down.

 

[Rightguide]

She's getting openly mocked by the other justices.

Amy Barrett took her apart like a clock, not too long ago. Jackson is a disgrace.

 

[icanhelp1]

The one that some say could lose up to 19 House seats if SCOTUS strikes it down.

When you create majority minorities I would assume that that model favors democrats, why? because democrats have owned the minority vote for eons.

 

[Rightguide]

Alan Dershowitz Predicts Supreme Court Will Deliver Shift in Election Law​

By Mariane Angela, Daily Caller News Foundation • Oct. 16, 2025

Harvard Law professor emeritus Alan Dershowitz said on Newsmax Wednesday that the Supreme Court is poised to move away from using race as a central factor in redistricting decisions.

The Supreme Court heard arguments Wednesday on whether the Voting Rights Act can still compel states to draw districts favorable to minority voters. Appearing on “The Record with Greta Van Susteren,” Dershowitz said the Court appears ready to apply the same reasoning it used in the affirmative action rulings to voting districts, curbing efforts to design congressional maps that favor specific racial groups.

“This is not like college admissions, where you can move to a meritocracy, and we know what a meritocracy means. But you can’t have a meritocracy when it comes to creating a district. Creation of the district either will help black people or will hurt or will help white voters or will hurt them. There’s no neutral principle,” Dershowitz told host Greta Van Susteren. “And I suspect the Supreme Court is moving away from focusing on race in the electoral context, as well as in the college-admission context. So if I had to make a prediction, I would predict that the district will not do well in front of the Supreme Court.”

Dershowitz referenced Justice Felix Frankfurter’s 1940s warning that the Court should avoid the “political thicket” of gerrymandering.

https://thelibertydaily.com/alan-dershowitz-predicts-supreme-court-will-deliver-shift/

 

[Philthy_Phil]

Do you believe race-based gerrymandering should remain a permanent fixture in voting maps? Has nothing changed since 1965?

Only that you and your buddies can't hang black people anymore and your klan outfit is tighter around the middle

 

[ChloeTzang]

Amy Barrett took her apart like a clock, not too long ago. Jackson is a disgrace.

Jackson is doing a great demonstration of why DEI appointees to anything at all are a huge mistake

 

[ll74]

Jackson is doing a great demonstration of why DEI appointees to anything at all are a huge mistake

The entire slanderous maga fuck crowd is showing their bigotry fairly well.

I guess they still like Candace Owens

 

[Rebel5soul]

It's not slander if it's earned.

 

[ll74]

It's not slander if it's earned.

Lol...of course

 

[latecomer91364]

I believe section II, if not the entire VRA, will soon be on the ash heap next to Kamala's political ambitions.

Funny how the Dems own that ash heap...

 

[eric_erosfan]

Yes, believe your lying ears. She lowers the overall IQ of SCOTUS by 20 points.

Fuck no. She is bringing up the average weighed down by the dumbassery of Clarence "DEI" Thomas.

 

[ChloeTzang]

 

[Hel_Books]

Hel_Books said:
Gerrymandering is being used now to dilute minority votes, so they have even less representation than would be fair.

Minorities don’t need a handicap. They can vote issues based on merit not color. To assume they can’t is insulting to them.

Gerrymandering black folks to dilute their votes with white folk's greater numbers is not just insulting, it's excluding them from the political process.

That's a no-no!

 

[Rebel5soul]

Gerrymandering black folks to dilute their votes with white folk's greater numbers is not just insulting, it's excluding them from the political process.

That's a no-no!

You're full of shit.

 

[Hel_Books]

Hel_Books said:
Gerrymandering black folks to dilute their votes with white folk's greater numbers is not just insulting, it's excluding them from the political process.

That's a no-no!

You're full of shit.

Do you disagree with me? Why? Or are you just playing the monkey-screaming-and-throwing-feces role here?

 

[MajorRewrite]

Southern states eagerly anticipate disenfranchising black voters. And racist MAGA sheep love it.

Before getting to the partisan and vote count implications, let’s first discuss what this means, which is essentially ending African-American political representation in the states of the old Confederacy. Most if not all majority-minority districts disappear and Republican state legislatures are free to draw up districts which spread/dilute African-American voters into safely Republican districts.

Source

 

[MajorRewrite]

View attachment 2571662

Crazy Chloe makes things up and becomes upset by the things he makes up.

 

[Rebel5soul]

Following the "Shit for Brains Brigade" train of logic we need to gerrymander for the Orientals, and the East Indians, and the Latino's and of course we should probably sub-divide all of that for finer granularity, right?

Tribal bullshit. Uga Chucka Uga Chucka.

 

[Rebel5soul]

Following though. How do you shit eating, scum sucking, racialists explain Obama being elected twice? According to your mealy mouthed narrative that could have never happened.

 

[icanhelp1]

Gerrymandering black folks to dilute their votes with white folk's greater numbers is not just insulting, it's excluding them from the political process.

That's a no-no!

We don't live in the 1960s.

 

[Hel_Books]

Hel_Books said:
Gerrymandering black folks to dilute their votes with white folk's greater numbers is not just insulting, it's excluding them from the political process.

That's a no-no!

We don't live in the 1960s.

Silly boy! Don't you understand time zones? When it's twelve o'clock in Washington, DC, in Louisiana it's 1962!

 

[icanhelp1]

Following the "Shit for Brains Brigade" train of logic we need to gerrymander for the Orientals, and the East Indians, and the Latino's and of course we should probably sub-divide all of that for finer granularity, right?

Tribal bullshit. Uga Chucka Uga Chucka.

These lit leftist ideologues can't count. How many minority districts are are represented by minority politicians. Major predominately white districts are represented by minority politicians. I believe in merit over race. SCOTUS, Congress are well represented by minority politicians. Many of our largest cities have minority mayors. Some of our largest PD commissioners are Black. Some people just can't get out of the 60s.

 

[Hel_Books]

I believe in merit over race.

That's the usual line. Make them live in ghettos with crappy schools and brutal cops, dilute their voting power by gerrymandering, keep the good healthcare away from them, site the toxic waste disposal facilities in their neighbourhoods . . . .

. . . and then when they dare to speak up, just sniff and say, "Well, I have merit and you don't, so shut up if you don't want us to send you, as the young Republicans say, to the gas chambers!"