Impeachment Thread

You can't separate them, it's been one allegation after another. No, this isn't scrutiny anymore, it's harassment!!! When the evidence isn't there or it's refuted Nadler and Schiff MANUFACTURE other allegations. It's a never ending process looking for a crime. It's never ending. If this happened to Obama you'd be screaming from the building tops. That open MIC incident was a legitimate impeachable offense, much worse than what Trump is accused of, but like i've said before ,YOU LOST YOUR ABILITY TO BE OBJECTIVE.
Projection .
DJT has been dishonest for years he stiffs contractors ,uses illegal aliens ,scams reporters ,investors and the public ,money launders through his casinos and properties .Any time he gets nailed for an offence Trump University and his charity for example,he negotiates a fine and moves on .
Add.
It's no wonder he gets investigated ,the shame is he's never been jailed .
 
Last edited:
JackLuis writes: "Nasty Nancy! Now go after Pence!"

Nancy Pelosi has no power anymore.

The Speaker of the House caved-into radical House Democrats against her own better judgement because THEY now lead her around by the nose! Pelosi KNOWS that Mitch McConnell controls everything from here on out, and that Schiff & Nadler are powerless to interfere with what now takes place in the U.S. Senate!

Do you SERIOUSLY believe that McConnell will now side with the Democrats in removing President Trump from office? You're not that dumb, Jack! Nancy's currently trying to avoid sending her clown-show impeachment to the senate because she KNOWS full-well that it's only going to ultimately embarrass her own party and further damage Democratic Party election hopes in 2020.

domroger adds: "DJT has been dishonest for years he stiffs contractors, uses illegal aliens, scams reporters, investors and the public, money launders through his casinos and properties..."

Yeah, and I'm quite certain that Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez & Ilhan Omar wanted really badly to get articles of impeachment charges drawn-up and included for those things, domroger, but the clown-show was already overloaded with other stupid-ass stuff, and so they ignored your above-mentioned silliness. Maybe next time they'll add all that, after AOC takes over the speakership from San-Fran-Nan?
 
Serious question: Why does impeached president trump insist on calling his impeachment a hoax?
Does hoax mean something different in the USA Than it does in the rest of the English speaking world?
 
Serious question: Why does impeached president trump insist on calling his impeachment a hoax?
Does hoax mean something different in the USA Than it does in the rest of the English speaking world?
Same meaning ,
It's called the Goebbels defence ,keep repeating a lie until seems to be a fact ,
 
If this happened to Obama you'd be screaming from the building tops.

What do you mean "if"? Can you say Benghazi? How about "Long form birth certificate"?

Of course, there is one difference: with Trump, there's ample reason to believe he really is guilty.



Serious question: Why does impeached president trump insist on calling his impeachment a hoax?

Because he knows what his fans want to hear. I've got to hand it to him, as much as I despise the man, he does know how to rally his troops.
 
Fuzzy1975 writes: "Trump is in illustrious company these days"

Yeah, Andrew Johnson, Bill Clinton, & Donald Trump - but Trump is poised to become the FIRST U.S. president ever to be re-elected AFTER being impeached!

You never checked the link did you? If you had, you would have noticed it contains all the Presidents, of all Countries who's President was also impeached. Quite the list of who's whos there.

Oh and Trump can't claim that world title of being the first impeached president to win reelection, it's been done; its on the list. Though he could claim he might be the first US president to be re-elected after being impeached.
 
Last edited:
Dump whines:
JackLuis writes: "Nasty Nancy! Now go after Pence!"

Nancy Pelosi has no power anymore.

The Speaker of the House caved-into radical House Democrats against her own better judgement because THEY now lead her around by the nose! Pelosi KNOWS that Mitch McConnell controls everything from here on out, and that Schiff & Nadler are powerless to interfere with what now takes place in the U.S. Senate!


If Moscow Mitch controls everything, why is Trumpypants saying he wants a Show Trial, and Mitch just wants a vote?

Dems and the LSM need to keep pressing the Senate Republicans to honour their oaths. WIth Donnie telling us he is letting Putin lead him, Repug's need to revolt against Putin's Puppet!:D

Nancy should say she's holding the first two Articles until the Taxes can be adjudicated and the obstruction of the Muller Report can be verified. Where's the whole thing BIlly boy?:confused:
 
magicalmoments writes: "Serious question: Why does impeached president trump insist on calling his impeachment a hoax?"

Think of impeachment as bringing in an indictment against somebody! You're claiming that they broke a law and need to be put on trial! But in the case of the House Democrats, they DON'T WANT the person indicted to receive a fair trial because they already know that the person will be acquitted! THAT'S the very definition of a hoax! The Trump-haters simply want to make accusations with nobody ever looking into them to see if they're valid!

domroger writes: "It's called the Goebbels defence, keep repeating a lie until seems to be a fact"

That's an EXCELLENT observation, domroger - the House Democrats want to keep on loudly repeating the same BIG LIE without allowing anybody to actually go on trial! They're channeling the sprit of Nazi propaganda chief Joseph Goebbels into their impeachment efforts!

YDB95 writes: "...with Trump, there's ample reason to believe he really is guilty."

If that were TRUE, YDB95, then the House Democrats would immediately want him put on trial! But, as Joseph Goebbels would tell you, better NOT to ever allow this to go to trial so that they can INSTEAD just keep on repeating their same HUGE LIES!

Fuzzy1975 writes: "Though he could claim he might be the first US president to be re-elected after being impeached."

Yeah, Fuzzy - that's EXACTLY what's going to happen! The Democrats don't have anybody running who can defeat Trump in 2020!
 
Fuzzy1975 writes: "Trump is in illustrious company these days"

Yeah, Andrew Johnson, Bill Clinton, & Donald Trump - but Trump is poised to become the FIRST U.S. president ever to be re-elected AFTER being impeached!

icanhelp1 writes: "They've been investigating him since 2016, before he was even elected, they didn't expect him to win, so yeah, they've been working on impeachment for 3 1/2 years."

An empty imeachment is the CLOSEST the Democratic Party can get to defeating Donald Trump. But even THEY recognize the fact that they have ZERO CHANCE of succeeding in the U.S. Senate, resulting in a failed coup attempt that will come back to bite them on their dumb-asses next November!

YDB95 writes: "Besides, if you're so sure he's innocent, shouldn't you welcome scrutiny?"

Joe & Hunter Biden both think you're full of @#$%$#, YDB95! But I AGREE with you! I'd LOVE to see those two forced to testify under oath in a U.S. Senate trial about what all went on in the Ukraine, along with Adam Schiff and his lies told to congress! If they're so sure they're innocent, they should WELCOME the scrutiny!
You do realize that the only reason trump asked the Ukraine to do him a favor and investigate Biden is because the FBI already informed trump and barr that there was insufficient evidence to warrant an investigation.
 
magicalmoments writes: "Serious question: Why does impeached president trump insist on calling his impeachment a hoax?"

Think of impeachment as bringing in an indictment against somebody! You're claiming that they broke a law and need to be put on trial! But in the case of the House Democrats, they DON'T WANT the person indicted to receive a fair trial because they already know that the person will be acquitted! THAT'S the very definition of a hoax! The Trump-haters simply want to make accusations with nobody ever looking into them to see if they're valid!

domroger writes: "It's called the Goebbels defence, keep repeating a lie until seems to be a fact"

That's an EXCELLENT observation, domroger - the House Democrats want to keep on loudly repeating the same BIG LIE without allowing anybody to actually go on trial! They're channeling the sprit of Nazi propaganda chief Joseph Goebbels into their impeachment efforts!

YDB95 writes: "...with Trump, there's ample reason to believe he really is guilty."

If that were TRUE, YDB95, then the House Democrats would immediately want him put on trial! But, as Joseph Goebbels would tell you, better NOT to ever allow this to go to trial so that they can INSTEAD just keep on repeating their same HUGE LIES!

Fuzzy1975 writes: "Though he could claim he might be the first US president to be re-elected after being impeached."

Yeah, Fuzzy - that's EXACTLY what's going to happen! The Democrats don't have anybody running who can defeat Trump in 2020!
Democrats will be more than happy to submit the impeachment for trial in the Senate just as soon as they're convinced the party over country and constitution republicans agree to execute a fair trial... likely to include the requirement that everyone under subpoena has to appear and testify... including Giuliani, Pence and probably even trump himself. Anything wrong with requiring people to comply with lawful subpoenas to testify to the truth?
 
The Senate doing the obviously sensible thing too--calling administration officials to testify under oath, which is absolutely proper for the Congress to do and is one of the articles of impeachment)--that would pin it all down. And if the Republicans in Congress won't do this obviously sensible thing, dangle that they won't in front of every voter until the voter absorbs what that means about the Republicans in Congress. Throw Moscow Mitch into the corner and pin him there.
 
The country’s official name is Ukraine, not “the Ukraine.”

Except to Vladimir Putin (and thus to Donald Trump). "The Ukraine" was while it was in the Soviet Union, which is where Putin (and thus his espionage asset, Donald Trump) wants to return it (and already has started doing so).
 
YDB95 writes: "It would be a first if he had checked it."

You & Fuzzy don't actually read any posts other than your own, do you?

THIS is what I wrote to Fuzzy: "Trump is poised to become the FIRST U.S. president ever to be re-elected AFTER being impeached!"

I repeat: "Trump is poised to become the FIRST U.S. president ever to be re-elected AFTER being impeached..."

Fuzzy responded with a list of the entire world containing: "all the Presidents of all Countries who's President was also impeached... and Trump can't claim that world title of being the first impeached president to win re-election, it's been done"

NOBODY CARES about what's happened to the presidents of Finland or Senegal - I'm talking exclusively about the United States!

JackLuis asks: "...why is Trumpypants saying he wants a Show Trial, and Mitch just wants a vote?"

Nancy Pelosi & the House Democrats want NEITHER, Jack, as they're both aware that the U.S. Senate is going to SLAM THE DOOR on their impeachment clown show, embarrass Schiff & Nadler, and make their entire party look like incompetent fools! And so San-Fran-Nan's going to try and make it look like impeachment never happened, hoping that the American public quickly forgets what her Democratic Party unsuccessfuly tried to do.
 
Just so we're all clear, Pelosi has said she's going to hand over the articles of impeachment to the Senate just as soon as they (the Senate) make their plans clear for the trial. It's simply a matter of preventing Moscow Mitch from sitting on the articles and hoping they'll go away, which is what he's done with almost everything else the House has passed this year.
 
Freakyguy41 writes: "Anything wrong with requiring people to comply with lawful subpoenas to testify to the truth?"

Seriously? You believe that Liz Warren, Chuck Schumer, Bernie Sanders, & Kamala Harris all need to STEP DOWN as jurors in Trump's upcoming impeachment trial in the U.S. Senate until they can demonstrate complete impartiality?

You seemingly don't understand our U.S. Constitution! It clearly states that while the House of Representatives has the power to impeach a president, ONLY elected members of the U.S. Senate have the power to determine his guilt or innocence! And presiding over this trial must be the Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court: John Roberts!

The Democratic Party doesn't care much for this arrangement as they KNOW they don't have much of a case. EVERYBODY thinks they're going to lose!

phrodeau writes: "The country’s official name is Ukraine, not 'the Ukraine.'"

And does that upset you, phrodeau, when people refer to the Ukraine by a name that you disagree with? I was probably more upset when Russia seized vast portions of the Ukraine (like the Crimean peninsula) while Obama was president, and that weak loser sat on his stupid ass and did nothing!
 
So your position is everyone who testified trump was trying to extort a biden investigation from the Ukraine... they are all risking their lives, reputation and careers by lying... and only trump is telling the truth? really?
At the end of the day, trump was supposed to pay the money in March and that's when he began pushing for the Ukraine to perform an investigation that the FBI and the U.S. intelligence community had already told trump there was insufficient evidence to warrant an investigation. Month after month, trump pushed for an investigation... including sending his personal attorney to represent the U.S. and request the investigation. In the July 25 phone call which was supposedly about corruption, the word corruption is never ever used during the call. The FBI has never conducted an investigation and the Ukraine has stated there is insufficient evidence to warrant an investigation so they are not investigating. Word of a whistleblower was wrongfully leaked to trump and barr in August so in a subsequent conversation with Sondland, trump reverses course and says no quid pro quo (after he knew he might have been caught)... a few weeks later, when the whistleblower complaint was delivered to the Senate and House Intelligence Committees, trump released the money the following day... 6 months late... risking Ukraine and U.S. national security.
The Ukraine is between a rock and hard place... they have an aggressive Russia on one side that would gladly invade and take over their country (and we know how much trump loves putin)... and on the other side they have trump willing to do anything to be re-elected... so the Ukraine has to say no quid pro quo (for now) while at the same time, not conducting an investigation either.

"People are feeble minded... lies endlessly repeated will be taken as truth. For the stubborn and those that resist, terror and fear are necessary." Adolf Hitler... paraphrased from Mein Kampf. Hitler credited the Christian Church with the development of the strategy. Goebbels executed the PR strategy dictated to him by Hitler. It is the strategy of the republican party and it is precisely why trump wanted and needed a fictitious investigation of biden... for a public smear campaign that's based on lies. Remember... trump promised to prosecute Hillary... but he never will because his lies will be exposed... No one is above the law.
 
Just a small point of order: the "big lie" comes from hitler, he used it in Mien Kampf. Goebbels used it much later, following the lead given by hitler.
Carry on.
 
Y

THIS is what I wrote to Fuzzy: "Trump is poised to become the FIRST U.S. president ever to be re-elected AFTER being impeached!"

I repeat: "Trump is poised to become the FIRST U.S. president ever to be re-elected AFTER being impeached..."

Fuzzy responded with a list of the entire world containing: "all the Presidents of all Countries who's President was also impeached... and Trump can't claim that world title of being the first impeached president to win re-election, it's been done"

NOBODY CARES about what's happened to the presidents of Finland or Senegal - I'm talking exclusively about the United States!

Chuckles, I'll tell you who cares....Donald J Trump...:D
 
So your position is everyone who testified trump was trying to extort a biden investigation from the Ukraine... they are all risking their lives, reputation and careers by lying... and only trump is telling the truth? really?


Don't underestimate just how madly in love with Trump some of his base - including Dumpington - is. Yes, they more than likely really do believe that!
 
Freakyguy41 writes: "So your position is everyone who testified trump was trying to extort a biden investigation from the Ukraine... they are all risking their lives, reputation and careers by lying... and only trump is telling the truth? really?"

Let's pretend that you're RIGHT, Freakyguy - and that Trump is guilty!

So what happens next? Well... he's already been impeached, right? That's like an indictment. NOW you send the whole matter over to a TRIAL which will take place in the U.S. Senate, correct? An indictment means NOTHING without a trial! The Senate will ultimately determine his guilt or innocence, as per the dictates of our U.S. Constitution. If he's guilty they'll find him guilty!

magicalmoments writes: "Just a small point of order: the "big lie" comes from hitler, he used it in Mien Kampf."

Thank you for that update, magicalmoments. Hitler, of course, headed the National-SOCIALIST dictatorship in Germany.

Fuzzy1975 writes: "Chuckles, I'll tell you who cares....Donald J Trump..."

You think so, Fuzzy? - I don't. - I think Trump is poised to become the FIRST U.S. president ever to be re-elected AFTER being impeached!
 
So... Let's assume trump is acquitted by the senate. That means he is not removed from office. Ok.
Let's assume he is republican candidate for president in 2020. Ok.
Let's assume he wins the election. Ok.
Sometime in January 2021 he'll be sworn in. Ok.
So, as former impeached president, impeached for breaching his oath of office, how does it work in 2021?
Does he swear to uphold the constitution (this time around, unlike last time) ...

Just musing on how it will go this time around. Also, the crowd size in 2021. I mean, it might be larger this time around, hell, I'd go to see that. How often would you get a chance to see an impeached president take the oath of office? Weird. Only in the USA.
 
Seriously? You're going to take the republican way of not answering my question but stating some unrelated accusation that certain democrats can't be impartial... lol.
Here... let me restate the question... and I will continue to restate the question until you answer it...
"Anything wrong with requiring people to comply with lawful subpoenas to testify to the truth?"

The Democratic Party knows they have the truth and evidence on their side... but they've never been deluded into thinking that the republican party over country and constitution won't support trump regardless... which is precisely why Pelosi should bide her time and ensure EVERYONE who receives a lawful subpoena to testify is required to appear and testify... and all subpoenaed materials have to be provided for examination. If John Roberts and the SCOTUS does not enforce lawful subpoenas then the "trial" is a sham before it begins.


phrodeau... dumpington is just trying to rile you... he knows Obama immediately imposed sanctions on Russia for invading the Crimea... and that trump eased some of those sanctions on Russia... plus, trump has done absolutely nothing about Russia's illegal invasion of the Crimea. So if Obama was a weak loser who sat on his ass... trump must be a weak loser on his knees in front of putin.
 
Only in the USA.


Let's wait and see if you actually get to say that a year from now. Never forget that Trump's win in 2016 was under circumstances that can't possibly be replicated under any circumstances. Democratic turnout was depressed in exactly the right areas due to the one-two punch of Russian meddling and an unpopular nominee whom just enough voters wrongly believed didn't need their votes. I do expect the Russians to pull the same thing next time, but now people will be on the lookout for it and less likely to be fooled, and no one will assume their vote isn't necessary.
 
Back
Top