Husband Want a Vasectomy? Has to get wives permission, but she can get abortion etc

Husband Want a Vasectomy? He’ll Have To Get Your Permission


BY KATIE ALLISON Husband Want a Vasectomy? He’ll Have To Get Your


What if every time American women went into pharmacies to get our prescriptions for birth control pills refilled, pharmacists required us to reveal our marital status, and then further required all married, female patients to bring our husbands into the store to sign a consent form before the prescribed contraceptives would be handed over?

Or how about this: what if a woman went to a plastic surgeon seeking a breast reduction, but the doctor told her that before he could proceed, the woman would need to present a signed, notarized note from her hubby confirming that he was really okay with the big stepdown in his wife’s bra size that would result from the surgery?

These scenarios sound completely farfetched, right? I mean, women would raise hell if doctors or pharmacists tried to force us to disclose marital status and/or require us to get signed consent from our husbands before we could access reproductive health services or other medical care.

But would it surprise you to learn that apparently, many doctors in this country REALLY DO require men who come to them seeking vasectomies to ‘fess up to marital status, and to then get their wives’ written consent before the physician will perform the procedure? In some cases, doctors require a face to face meeting with a man’s wife – in addition to the signed consent from her – before a vasectomy will be performed.

How did I discover this? Well, without getting all up in my husband’s business by offering too many details, suffice it to say that he and I can now credibly report that this inexplicably retro violation of men’s rights to privacy and medical autonomy actually does take place.

After it happened to us this week, I started Googling around to see what the deal was. The nurse who had presented me with the consent form to sign had told me that “it’s the law,” but I knew that couldn’t be right. If anything, the practice is likely against the law.

Oddly, as I surfed around online, I couldn’t really nail down any definitive explanation of how widespread this practice is, or of why doctors are able to get away with something that’s so clearly a violation of male patients’ rights. There is a lot of discussion online around the fact that many doctors all over the country do indeed make this demand of their married, male patients. But most of the online chatter I could find is from men asking the same question I have: what is the basis for this intrusive, possibly illegal practice, given that women are not required to disclose their marital status or get signed permission from their husbands before accessing reproductive health services?

So can anyone tell me what the deal is with this? Do all doctors who perform vasectomies require patients’ wives to give signed consent, or does this practice vary from doctor to doctor? Why would doctors performing surgical sterilization on men be more concerned about getting wives’ consent than doctors who perform tubals and hysterectomies on women are about getting the go-ahead from husbands? Are doctors just less worried that men will complain about sexist discrimination? Also, how is this practice possibly legal? Any of you legal types want to weigh in on that aspect of this?

If your husband has had a vasectomy, did the doctor require you to meet with him and/or give your signed consent before he (or she) would perform the surgery? If so, what did you think of this requirement? What did your husband think?
FacebookTwitterGoogle+TumblrPinterest
What if every time American women went into pharmacies to get our prescriptions for birth control pills refilled, pharmacists required us to reveal our marital status, and then further required all married, female patients to bring our husbands into the store to sign a consent form before the prescribed contraceptives would be handed over?

Or how about this: what if a woman went to a plastic surgeon seeking a breast reduction, but the doctor told her that before he could proceed, the woman would need to present a signed, notarized note from her hubby confirming that he was really okay with the big stepdown in his wife’s bra size that would result from the surgery?

These scenarios sound completely farfetched, right? I mean, women would raise hell if doctors or pharmacists tried to force us to disclose marital status and/or require us to get signed consent from our husbands before we could access reproductive health services or other medical care.

But would it surprise you to learn that apparently, many doctors in this country REALLY DO require men who come to them seeking vasectomies to ‘fess up to marital status, and to then get their wives’ written consent before the physician will perform the procedure? In some cases, doctors require a face to face meeting with a man’s wife – in addition to the signed consent from her – before a vasectomy will be performed.

How did I discover this? Well, without getting all up in my husband’s business by offering too many details, suffice it to say that he and I can now credibly report that this inexplicably retro violation of men’s rights to privacy and medical autonomy actually does take place.

After it happened to us this week, I started Googling around to see what the deal was. The nurse who had presented me with the consent form to sign had told me that “it’s the law,” but I knew that couldn’t be right. If anything, the practice is likely against the law.

Oddly, as I surfed around online, I couldn’t really nail down any definitive explanation of how widespread this practice is, or of why doctors are able to get away with something that’s so clearly a violation of male patients’ rights. There is a lot of discussion online around the fact that many doctors all over the country do indeed make this demand of their married, male patients. But most of the online chatter I could find is from men asking the same question I have: what is the basis for this intrusive, possibly illegal practice, given that women are not required to disclose their marital status or get signed permission from their husbands before accessing reproductive health services?

So can anyone tell me what the deal is with this? Do all doctors who perform vasectomies require patients’ wives to give signed consent, or does this practice vary from doctor to doctor? Why would doctors performing surgical sterilization on men be more concerned about getting wives’ consent than doctors who perform tubals and hysterectomies on women are about getting the go-ahead from husbands? Are doctors just less worried that men will complain about sexist discrimination? Also, how is this practice possibly legal? Any of you legal types want to weigh in on that aspect of this?

If your husband has had a vasectomy, did the doctor require you to meet with him and/or give your signed consent before he (or she) would perform the surgery? If so, what did you think of this requirement? What did your husband think?
 
Why doesn't your straight baker doesn't have to do business with gays example work here, too, bb?

If a doctor requires a wifey's permission to get a vasectomy...

...why would an objecting man wanna do business with that doctor in the first place?

Huh?

He's free to do his doctoring how he wishes...

...you're free to seek your doctoring from whomever you wish.

Why do you keep your statist double standard...

...stuck so high up your butt, bb?
 
Wife's consent is not required. In fact it is a violation of federal law (HIPPA) for the doctor to disclose any medical issues with anyone without the patients' written consent.
 
Wife's consent is not required. In fact it is a violation of federal law (HIPPA) for the doctor to disclose any medical issues with anyone without the patients' written consent.

read it again

NOT required

MOST DR's expect it
 
Yes, I know how it is presented in your thread, but the doctor can't enforce it. I guess he can refuse to do the procedure, but that is the limit of his remedy.
 
Yes, I know how it is presented in your thread, but the doctor can't enforce it. I guess he can refuse to do the procedure, but that is the limit of his remedy.

compare

and

contrast

that

with

abortions

etc
 
Doctors are not required to perform an abortion either. It's always a doctor's decision whether to conduct any operation. Patients don't just walk in off the street, demand a procedure, and then automatically get it from surgeons who are helpless to refuse.
 
Soooooo, bb...

...why your double-standard?

It's ok...

...I'll wait:rolleyes:
 
historically, although it is a short history, not all countries allow for elective sterilization. of those that do, many have required spousal consent because of the connection between marriage and family planning. Other countries have recommended consent without it being a legal requirement.

The subject of privacy (my right, my body) didn't really come until play until the 70s with Roe v Wade. In the United States, there is not a legal requirement for spousal consent but many physicians still recommend it because there remains a marital impact. it becomes an ethical decision instead of a legal one that will forever have a foothold in politics as a controversial issue.

Regarding the privacy act, I have certainly witnessed a large number of consents where personal information is never shared. For elective procedures, it becomes a conversation about what most people experience, how most cases go, etc.
 
Men don't have to have have consent to have a vasectomy. However, when you're carrying the baby, then you get to choose.
 
Back
Top