Hunter Biden was stupid

ghxstfac3z

Virgin
Joined
Jun 23, 2023
Posts
21
Burisma executives thought Hunter Biden was “stupid” but felt they had to keep paying him to continue receiving political protection from his father, a confidential FBI source reported to the bureau in 2020.

The unverified allegations were captured on an FBI form that has been the source of fierce debate in Washington in recent months. Republicans released the four-page document Thursday.

The source, whose identity was redacted, said Burisma officials acknowledged that they hired Hunter Biden to “protect us, through his dad, from all kinds of problems.” In a subsequent meeting, the officials expressed confidence that the Bidens would clear obstacles to get the Ukrainian natural gas company listed on an American stock exchange.

“Don’t worry, Hunter will take care of all of those issues through his dad,” one executive said, according to the FBI’s summary of the source’s information.

The source said one of the Burisma figures had 17 recordings involving the Bidens. Two included President Biden himself, the source said.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/new...9Ry71aKOR0-UVOoWHE0dQKx1vJVEKQp-WIiF8JDbLX6sI
 
These aren't your words; you C&Ped a Washington Times article without citing it as a source.

🙂
 
Their is a lot of information that says this whole thing stinks. This is only apart of the corruption that shows the whole family was involved in a complex scheme to get rich over a number of years. The laptop was a source of a lot of information intentionally withheld until after the election, a real coverup. This is far worse the the Watergate crimes. I believe the Justice department must have a house cleaning.
 
Why are we using the the past tense here? He's a nepokid not that there is really anything wrong with it.
 
There.
better?
Rory, what is your opinion on this

There is a lot of information that says this whole thing stinks. This is only apart of the corruption that shows the whole family was involved in a complex scheme to get rich over a number of years. The laptop was a source of a lot of information intentionally withheld until after the election, a real coverup. This is far worse the the Watergate crimes. I believe the Justice department must have a house cleaning.
 
There.
better?
Rory, what is your opinion on this

There is a lot of information that says this whole thing stinks. This is only apart of the corruption that shows the whole family was involved in a complex scheme to get rich over a number of years. The laptop was a source of a lot of information intentionally withheld until after the election, a real coverup. This is far worse the the Watergate crimes. I believe the Justice department must have a house cleaning.

That's the thing. Politicians are corrupt to varying degrees. The fact that the Right can't even make a credible accusation against Joe, much less the family as a whole. He's barely rich now anyhow. It was correct to keep the laptop away from the public until after the election. Not doing that would have been deeply irresonsible.
 
Since you obviously didn't read my post with any level of comprehension I'm even less impressed than I was five minutes ago.
 
Every president, Democrat or Republican, has seemed to have close family members who try to trade on their relationship either illegally or unethically. Hunter Biden is that for Joe Biden.
 
That's the thing. Politicians are corrupt to varying degrees. The fact that the Right can't even make a credible accusation against Joe, much less the family as a whole. He's barely rich now anyhow. It was correct to keep the laptop away from the public until after the election. Not doing that would have been deeply irresonsible.

What exactly would you require for "an allegation" to be "credible."

Would an unverified memo that someone pees the bed be enough for you? Or do you need more than that? Perhaps it would be enough to be "credible" if there were testimony from eye witnesses, business partners, tax returns, and videos?

Someone should see if stuff like that exists. That way any "allegations" based on them would be "credible"...
 
Sure. Drugs, prostitutes, bribes and government influence. Nothing wrong with any of those.
Legalize it all and tax the shit out of it and make all our little Hunter's de facto outstanding citizens for actually paying taxes!

Bribes are actually legal, they're called campaign contributions. We need to tax them heavily. That's what sin taxes are for, to reduce activities that are bad for society. Of course, this falls hardest on the poor, women, minorities, children who vote, even kids with chicken pox...
 
What exactly would you require for "an allegation" to be "credible."

Would an unverified memo that someone pees the bed be enough for you? Or do you need more than that? Perhaps it would be enough to be "credible" if there were testimony from eye witnesses, business partners, tax returns, and videos?

Someone should see if stuff like that exists. That way any "allegations" based on them would be "credible"...
You're arguing with people who convicted Trump of Russian collusion with zero evidence, credible or otherwise.

Now they're defending the Bidens to the death based on the same sort of evidentiary material.
 
You're arguing with people who convicted Trump of Russian collusion with zero evidence, credible or otherwise.

Now they're defending the Bidens to the death based on the same sort of evidentiary material.
How to tell us that you never read the Mueller Report, without saying that you didn't bother reading the Mueller Report.
Plus, doesn't understand the meaning of 'convicted'.
 
Legalize it all and tax the shit out of it and make all our little Hunter's de facto outstanding citizens for actually paying taxes!

Bribes are actually legal, they're called campaign contributions. We need to tax them heavily. That's what sin taxes are for, to reduce activities that are bad for society. Of course, this falls hardest on the poor, women, minorities, children who vote, even kids with chicken pox...
Now that's a good idea. It'll mean that Trump might finally pay some tax like the rest of us.
 
It was used in the general sense of having made up their minds.

Stupid should be a part that you only play on TV...

🥺

... stupid is as stupid posts. Nobody wealthy directly pays taxes, they do it indirectly through their economic activity.

Are you slow, or just mental?
 
It was used in the general sense of having made up their minds.

Stupid should be a part that you only play on TV...

🥺

... stupid is as stupid posts. Nobody wealthy directly pays taxes, they do it indirectly through their economic activity.

Are you slow, or just mental?

Oh do tell...

Do you have anything to offer other than snide and snark?
¯⁠\⁠(⁠°⁠_⁠o⁠)⁠/⁠¯
 
The president says Hunter is the smartest guy he knows. Some might disagree with that assessment but no one can question Hunter’s religious faith. He’s a devout Crystal Methodist.
 
Legalize it all and tax the shit out of it and make all our little Hunter's de facto outstanding citizens for actually paying taxes!

Bribes are actually legal, they're called campaign contributions. We need to tax them heavily. That's what sin taxes are for, to reduce activities that are bad for society. Of course, this falls hardest on the poor, women, minorities, children who vote, even kids with chicken pox...
Legalizing bad behavior only encourages more. Take a trip to Oregon or San Francisco and see if taxes will fix their issues.
 
Back
Top