Hunter Screws Up Again

[Rightguide]

BREAKING: Hunter Biden's Legal Team Just Got Scorched by Judge for Making False Statements in CA Tax Case​

By Susie Moore | 10:00 PM on July 24, 2024

Ouch! That's the only thing I could think to say in response to reading the order handed down by U.S. District Court Judge Mark Scarsi on Wednesday requiring Hunter Biden's legal team to show cause why they should not be sanctioned for making false statements in their recently filed motion to dismiss. While Hunter was presumably focused on his father's Oval Office address, his attorneys were getting lit up by a federal judge.

Here's what happened: On July 15th, Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the Florida criminal case against former President Donald Trump regarding his alleged improper retention of classified documents on the basis that Special Counsel Jack Smith's appointment violated the Appointments Clause of the Constitution.

On July 18th, Biden's legal team filed a motion to dismiss the California tax case against him, attempting to piggyback off Cannon's ruling and asserting that Special Counsel David Weiss, likewise, was improperly appointed and thus didn't have authority to bring the charges against Biden.

Jonathan Turley notes:

However, a key difference between Smith and Weiss is that it could lead these courts to asking “why is a Weiss like a Smith?” The extent that he is not could prove a critical distinction. Weiss is a Senate confirmed U.S. Attorney where Smith was a private citizen plucked by Merrick Garland from the general population for the position.

More here: https://redstate.com/smoosieq/2024/...ched-by-judge-in-california-tax-case-n2177343

Guess Hunter should have hired lawyers smart enough to read and understand Justice Thomas' concurring opinion on Jack Smith.

 

[ll74]

Still not voting for Hunter!

 

[dkovic77]

BREAKING: Hunter Biden's Legal Team Just Got Scorched by Judge for Making False Statements in CA Tax Case​

By Susie Moore | 10:00 PM on July 24, 2024

Ouch! That's the only thing I could think to say in response to reading the order handed down by U.S. District Court Judge Mark Scarsi on Wednesday requiring Hunter Biden's legal team to show cause why they should not be sanctioned for making false statements in their recently filed motion to dismiss. While Hunter was presumably focused on his father's Oval Office address, his attorneys were getting lit up by a federal judge.

Here's what happened: On July 15th, Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the Florida criminal case against former President Donald Trump regarding his alleged improper retention of classified documents on the basis that Special Counsel Jack Smith's appointment violated the Appointments Clause of the Constitution.

On July 18th, Biden's legal team filed a motion to dismiss the California tax case against him, attempting to piggyback off Cannon's ruling and asserting that Special Counsel David Weiss, likewise, was improperly appointed and thus didn't have authority to bring the charges against Biden.

Jonathan Turley notes:

However, a key difference between Smith and Weiss is that it could lead these courts to asking “why is a Weiss like a Smith?” The extent that he is not could prove a critical distinction. Weiss is a Senate confirmed U.S. Attorney where Smith was a private citizen plucked by Merrick Garland from the general population for the position.

More here: https://redstate.com/smoosieq/2024/...ched-by-judge-in-california-tax-case-n2177343

Guess Hunter should have hired lawyers smart enough to read and understand Justice Thomas' concurring opinion on Jack Smith.

Wait, so it’s always bad when your lawyers make false statements on your behalf… or only when you are a liberal?

Just checking?

Or it’s all up to you to decide… got it.

Well you chose Daddy Vlady, or did he chose you?

 

[Bn2f]

Haha.
Who is this Hunter woman you’re speaking of?

 

[DeluxAuto]

Now Joe will never get a second term!

 

[Rightguide]

Still not voting for Hunter!

He was the one who dragged your hero Joe down. Hope those pardons have already been signed.

 

[Bn2f]

He was the one who dragged your hero Joe down. Hope those pardons have already been signed.

Why are you so bad at this?

You just wasted an opportunity to take credit yourself and your 24/8 ageist beef. Maybe you’re getting too old to be coming here and doing this.

 

[DeluxAuto]

He was the one who dragged your hero Joe down. Hope those pardons have already been signed.

I agree with you that President Biden is still sharp and in no way did the fake media diagnosis of his "senility" have anything to do with him dropping out

 

[ll74]

He was the one who dragged your hero Joe down. Hope those pardons have already been signed.

I don't idolize politicians. That's the MAGA approach.

 

[Saint_Ann]

I agree with you that President Biden is still sharp and in no way did the fake media diagnosis of his "senility" have anything to do with him dropping out

Your own party made him drop out because of or as an excuse for senility.

 

[DeluxAuto]

Your own party made him drop out because of or as an excuse for senility.

Correct. My party is smart enough to give us a better candidate.

Your party is not.

We are not the same.

 

[Saint_Ann]

Correct. My party is smart enough to give us a better candidate.

Your party is not.

We are not the same.

Fuck loyalty. Amirite?

 

[DeluxAuto]

Fuck loyalty. Amirite?

You would have done better by not responding at all.

 

[BrightShinyGirl]

Fuck loyalty. Amirite?

President Biden's decision to step out of the race when and how he did was a calculated political move to cut Donald Trump off at the knees. He wasn't forced out. He played the media and the Republican Party like violins.

 

[Saint_Ann]

You would have done better by not responding at all.

Ditto.

 

[Lazaran]

Fuck loyalty. Amirite?

Loyalty - TO. A. POINT.



President Biden OWNS his debate performance, his age related electability issues, and his messaging limitations.

Many Democrats (myself included) had President Biden’s back as the nominee, right up to the point when HE chose to step aside after considering ALL the factors (factors which average Americans aren’t privy to) that would have precluded positive election results (up and down the ballot) in November if he had carried on the fight.

I have the same respect for, and LOYALTY to, President Biden, the man and President, after HIS decision to step aside as the Democratic nominee for the November election.

President Biden made the decision to step aside, and I respect and support HIS decision - out of LOYALTY.



Hope that ^ helps.





Side note:

There is only one "Democrat" in "power" that should be shown the door for GROSS DISLOYALTY to President Biden, the Democratic Party, and America - and that is Rashida Tlaib.

Lines were crossed.

 

[Rotadom]

Rightguide's official response to VP Harris destroying the felon's pipe dream of a second term is, "... but Hunter!"

 

[Rightguide]

I don't idolize politicians. That's the MAGA approach.

BS, you're fawning over Harris as we speak.

 

[Rightguide]

Your own party made him drop out because of or as an excuse for senility.

They blatantly trash the democracy they accuse Trump of destroying. We've never voted for a presidential candidate that wasn't a winning candidate in a primary election.

 

[ll74]

BS, you're fawning over Harris as we speak.

I'm voting for her because her policies are better than 45's.

I don't have a Harris flag. A Harris hat. Or Harris Gold sneakers. I don't fly flags on my car for her. I don't deck my boat out with Harris supporting shit.

I'm not in a cult of Harris, nor will I ever be.

 

[HisArpy]

I'm voting for her because her policies are better than 45's.

I don't have a Harris flag. A Harris hat. Or Harris Gold sneakers. I don't fly flags on my car for her. I don't deck my boat out with Harris supporting shit.

I'm not in a cult of Harris, nor will I ever be.

Kamala has no policies. She is, and always has been, nothing but a puppet.

So your vote for her will be a vote for the man behind the curtain who has no loyalty nor care for you or the country.

Not smart. But hey, anyone but Trump, right? Because the world peace and American prosperity in his 1st term was so bad.

 

[ll74]

Kamala has no policies. She is, and always has been, nothing but a puppet.

She is part of the administration who followed Biden's policies. She had plenty of policies in her previous roles worth criticizing and celebrating. I appreciate her law and order policies in California as well as her support f bail reform.

You thinking she has no policies is an indication of your ignorance.

It is evidence that you don't care to discover anything about her

So your vote for her will be a vote for the man behind the curtain who has no loyalty nor care for you or the country.

No, it will be a vote for her policies which I mostly support

Not smart. But hey, anyone but Trump, right? Because the world peace and American prosperity in his 1st term was so bad.

I don't support Trump's policy positions, specifically his immigration, economical, foreign policy positions, but not restrained to those.

I don't need to be against him to support Harris, though I absolutely am against him

 

[HisArpy]

She is part of the administration who followed Biden's policies. She had plenty of policies in her previous roles worth criticizing and celebrating. I appreciate her law and order policies in California as well as her support f bail reform.

You thinking she has no policies is an indication of your ignorance.

It is evidence that you don't care to discover anything about her


No, it will be a vote for her policies which I mostly support


I don't support Trump's policy positions, specifically his immigration, economical, foreign policy positions, but not restrained to those.

I don't need to be against him to support Harris, though I absolutely am against him

You've been duped. You won't believe me because you've built a personality and world of denial around it, but you've been duped.

By the way, I LIVE IN HER HOME STATE, I know EXACTLY what kind of person she is, what her policies have accomplished, and the political and social wreckage she left behind.

You've been duped.


Because TDS and hate.

 

[ll74]

You've been duped. You won't believe me because you've built a personality and world of denial around it, but you've been duped.

You're the biased one. She has a political career with political positions. I guess you're not smart enough to understand that perhaps.

By the way, I LIVE IN HER HOME STATE, I know EXACTLY what kind of person she is, what her policies have accomplished, and the political and social wreckage she left behind.

But she has no policies.?!?

You've been duped.


Because TDS and hate.

You should read the shit you write sometime.

We're discussing Harris. The only one who has brought up 45 is you.

 

[dkovic77]

They blatantly trash the democracy they accuse Trump of destroying. We've never voted for a presidential candidate that wasn't a winning candidate in a primary election.

You didn’t? Seems you did in 2020. He tried to overthrow those results and thankfully there was 5% backbone in Mike Pence.

How’s your bankrupt “news” going??

Were you able to vote for Daddy Vlady too? You have dual citizenship right?