hey ppman: AMERICANS AREN’T THE ONLY ONES FORCED TO SUPPORT NON-ARTISTS

Todd-'o'-Vision

Super xVirgin Man
Joined
Jan 2, 2002
Posts
5,609
America isn’t the only country in the world where taxpayers are forced to hand over some of their hard-earned money for government-mandated transfer to artists who can’t survive in the private sector. Evidently it happens in England also.

The taxpayers of England have fixin’ to pay big bucks to Franko B. Franko is going to appear in the annual festival of performance art in the British midlands later this month. Would you like to know what Franko is going to do for his taxpayer loot? He’s going to take a razor and make a 10 cm incision across his stomach. He’s then going to stand there for six hours while blood trickles down his body. He even has a doctor on hand to make sure the wound doesn’t heal until the “performance” is over. One-by-one individuals will be invited to file into Franko’s room where they can spend a couple of precious minutes with the immensely talented artist.

The festival director thinks this is all fine. He says Franko’s canvas is his body and his main material is his blood. The director has over $100,000 of British taxpayer’s money to spend on his festival. He won’t say how much Franko is getting.

This isn’t new. A similar piece of “performance art” took place at taxpayer’s expense in the US several years ago. The performer took the stage with another man who was HIV positive. The “artist” took a razor and made several cuts in the HIV patient’s back. The blood flowed rather nicely. The “artist” took some paper towels and used them to soak up the HIV positive blood. He then attached these bloody paper towels to a clothesline that was stretched over the audience. Using pulleys he sent the towels to hang over audience members. This, my friends, was art paid for by taxpayers.

Your government at work.
 
Todd-'o'-Vision said:
America isn’t the only country in the world where taxpayers are forced to hand over some of their hard-earned money for government-mandated transfer to artists who can’t survive in the private sector. Evidently it happens in England also.

This isn’t new. A similar piece of “performance art” took place at taxpayer’s expense in the US several years ago. The performer took the stage with another man who was HIV positive. The “artist” took a razor and made several cuts in the HIV patient’s back. The blood flowed rather nicely. The “artist” took some paper towels and used them to soak up the HIV positive blood. He then attached these bloody paper towels to a clothesline that was stretched over the audience. Using pulleys he sent the towels to hang over audience members. This, my friends, was art paid for by taxpayers.

Your government at work.

Yeah it's daft I know. The more notorious ones over the years in the UK have been a pile of bricks from a demolition site on display at the Tate Gallery, a dead sheep preserved in that embalming fluid and made to look as if it was floating in a perspex cabinet and a room where the lights on on and off.

But these weird works of art aren't the only ones the public gets fed up about.

The Royal Opera House with its prices so high that only the well off can afford to attend receives Government subsisties. It was also one of the first benificiaries of the National Lottery money for the Arts and Sports (quite a few million quid I think) to build a new annexe.

At the same time Soccer clubs and other sports are forced to raise money by whatever means they can or go out of business

Makes you sick doesn't it...

ppman
 
Re: Re: hey ppman: AMERICANS AREN’T THE ONLY ONES FORCED TO SUPPORT NON-ARTISTS

p_p_man said:


Yeah it's daft I know. The more notorious ones over the years in the UK have been a pile of bricks from a demolition site on display at the Tate Gallery, a dead sheep preserved in that embalming fluid and made to look as if it was floating in a perspex cabinet and a room where the lights on on and off.

But these weird works of art aren't the only ones the public gets fed up about.

The Royal Opera House with its prices so high that only the well off can afford to attend receives Government subsisties. It was also one of the first benificiaries of the National Lottery money for the Arts and Sports (quite a few million quid I think) to build a new annexe.

At the same time Soccer clubs and other sports are forced to raise money by whatever means they can or go out of business

Makes you sick doesn't it...

ppman

I quite agree with the sickeing waste of tax payer money on the arts.

Like you say only the hoity toity can afford to even go see it, yet eveyone else pays for it. Are we supposed to just simply feel good about our taxed contribution :rolleyes:

Although I disagree with sports being tax payer supported as well.

Those who want it should pay for it, those who don't shouldn't have thier hard earned money forcavly seized by the governemt for thier own purposes such as arts or sports.
 
Re: Re: Re: hey ppman: AMERICANS AREN’T THE ONLY ONES FORCED TO SUPPORT NON-ARTISTS

Todd-'o'-Vision said:
Although I disagree with sports being tax payer supported as well.

Those who want it should pay for it, those who don't shouldn't have thier hard earned money forcavly seized by the governemt for thier own purposes such as arts or sports.

Yes nobody would mind if it was fair right across the board. But who are the ones who dish out the funds?

The ones who are most likely to attend functions known for their exclusivity.

:)
 
Haha, Britain sucks. Oh wait, so do we.

Eh. I assume they don't hand out too much to just any artist.
 
MechaBlade said:
Haha, Britain sucks. Oh wait, so do we.

Eh. I assume they don't hand out too much to just any artist.

I think a bit of nepotism and the odd blow job helps..

:D
 
bluespoke said:


:eek: :eek: :eek:

You mean Tracey Emin (sp) didn't do it just on her fantastic ability?:D

Mmmgghhh <<cough...choke>> "Swallow, I said swallow!!"

Naaah...

:D
 
Last edited:
Hey, Todd. I'll make a deal with you. I'll pick up your tax bill for the arts if you'll pick up mine for that whacky performance art group known as the "Department of Defense."

And did you know that the majority of your federal tax bill for "the arts" actually goes to support military bands and orchestras? The cost to you of financing a typical NEA or NEH grant comes out to about 1/11th of one penny.
 
Back
Top