Helen Andrews Explains How Feminization Is Destroying Civilization

[TravisAW]

I thought this was going to be an article on the cuckolding and sissies phenomenon.

More women needed in STEM subjects but it shouldn't be forced upon them. Too many misogynists and chauvinists the sciences from my experience unfortunately.

 

[Rightguide]

Aah ..the "woman" other......isn't that the same as the "feminist" other?

I know you need to make them part of some.grouo you hate to feel good about yourself.

You make no sense. Maybe you shouldn't type with your mouth full. You can call them whatever you want:

female, adult female, individual, person, mother / mother-to-be, citizen, adult, matron, maiden, lady, Damsel, dowager, mother of sorrows, Eve’s daughter, creature, wretch, degenerate, husk of a woman, excuse for a mother, mother-in-name-only, derelict female, failed matron, cold-blooded female, she-being, vessel without virtue,. Take your pick.

 

[ll74]

You make no sense. Maybe you shouldn't type with your mouth full. You can call them whatever you want:

female, adult female, individual, person, mother / mother-to-be, citizen, adult, matron, maiden, lady, Damsel, dowager, mother of sorrows, Eve’s daughter, creature, wretch, degenerate, husk of a woman, excuse for a mother, mother-in-name-only, derelict female, failed matron, cold-blooded female, she-being, vessel without virtue,. Take your pick.

Yes, a group of people you hate....women.

Thanks for confirming.

You need to separate yourself from the group who you believe doesn't live up to your values.

 

[wallstreetguy]

Carmen Paglia says that every great civilization falls after the feminization of its men. She is right.

 

[ll74]

Carmen Paglia says that every great civilization falls after the feminization of its men. She is right.

Lol

 

[Rightguide]

Yes, a group of people you hate....women.

Thanks for confirming.

You need to separate yourself from the group who you believe doesn't live up to your values.

That is a lie. I simply dislike woke or crazy women, like those that populate the Democrat Party.

 

[ll74]

That is a lie. I simply dislike woke or crazy women, like those that populate the Democrat Party.

Lol...sure ya do

You hate women.

 

[Hel_Books]

Hel_Books said:
Perhaps not. But your OP simply reeks of nostalgia for a time when women "knew their place"!

I read this morning about a woman who, forgetting her "place," abandoned her newborn in a New York City train station, a chilling act of ignorance and moral vacancy. A person capable of that level of cruelty deserves to be punished. Twenty years behind bars would be mercy; permanent sterilization would be justice.

Ever think it's your dystopian America that drives people to such madness? Look at Trump killing medical benefits to gift tax breaks to his billionaire cronies, pumping $20 billion into Argentina while reneging on federal commitments to infrastructure (in Democratic party run states, of course!)

Sure, people in your country do bad things (though only the friends of Donald Trump can get pardoned for it), but if all you're doing is screaming, "Off with their heads!" like the queen in Alice in Wonderland, then, well . . .

Anyway, does your hatred for that one unfortunate woman (if it is a woman - right after giving birth a woman would have a hard time climbing the stairs to the subway shown in those news reports - perhaps she had male help?) indicate you'd like to see all women "in their proper place"?

 

[Hel_Books]

The Great Feminization​

Helen Andrews​

October 16, 2025

In 2019, I read an article about Larry Summers and Harvard that changed the way I look at the world. The author, writing under the pseudonym “J. Stone,” argued that the day Larry Summers resigned as president of Harvard University marked a turning point in our culture. The entire “woke” era could be extrapolated from that moment, from the details of how Summers was cancelled and, most of all, who did the cancelling: women.

The basic facts of the Summers case were familiar to me. On January 14, 2005, at a conference on “Diversifying the Science and Engineering Workforce,” Larry Summers gave a talk that was supposed to be off the record. In it, he said that female underrepresentation in hard sciences was partly due to “different availability of aptitude at the high end” as well as taste differences between men and women “not attributable to socialization.” Some female professors in attendance were offended and sent his remarks to a reporter, in defiance of the off-the-record rule. The ensuing scandal led to a no-confidence vote by the Harvard faculty and, eventually, Summers’s resignation.

The essay argued that it wasn’t just that women had cancelled the president of Harvard; it was that they’d cancelled him in a very feminine way. They made emotional appeals rather than logical arguments. “When he started talking about innate differences in aptitude between men and women, I just couldn’t breathe because this kind of bias makes me physically ill,” said Nancy Hopkins, a biologist at MIT. Summers made a public statement clarifying his remarks, and then another, and then a third, with the apology more insistent each time. Experts chimed in to declare that everything Summers had said about sex differences was within the scientific mainstream. These rational appeals had no effect on the mob hysteria.

This cancellation was feminine, the essay argued, because all cancellations are feminine. Cancel culture is simply what women do whenever there are enough of them in a given organization or field. That is the Great Feminization thesis, which the same author later elaborated upon at book length: Everything you think of as “wokeness” is simply an epiphenomenon of demographic feminization.

Much more here: https://www.compactmag.com/article/the-great-feminization/

It's about, among other things, "warriors and worriers" and how “The rule of law will not survive the legal profession becoming majority female.”

This has been thoroughly debunked here. A sample:

. . . Are we supposed to find that swashbuckling masculine spirit of business in the sight of our manly tech tycoons groveling before Donald Trump? And let’s not get started on the rule of law under Trump, that supposed restorer of American manhood. Andrews points to the Title IX campus tribunals adjudicating sexual misconduct claims—often with egregious violations of due process and overbroad definitions of offenses—as the prime example of what to expect when the courts end up in female hands and the guilt of the accused is presumed based on empathy for the alleged victims. It’s an issue on which I have repeatedly written myself (and on which a good many feminists have spoken out); but unfair suspension or even expulsion from college seems rather trivial compared to, say, due process–free deportation to a gulag in El Salvador. Or to the president’s use of the Justice Department as his personal law firm and of federal prosecutors as his henchmen who can be fired if they decline to pursue the president’s vendettas against his personal enemies. . . .

 

[YDB95]

Carmen Paglia says that every great civilization falls after the feminization of its men. She is right.

Since you can't even get her first name right, I sincerely doubt you really understand her arguments. (Which I mostly disagree with, but that's beside the point.)

 

[Lazaran]

Since you can't even get her first name right, I sincerely doubt you really understand her arguments. (Which I mostly disagree with, but that's beside the point.)

Pulling "Carmen" (Camilla) Paglia out of their MAGAt ass to cite her opinions on societal gender issues is like when they trot out Thomas Sowell and cite his opinion on societal racial issues…

The MAGAts’ go to pool of "independent experts" on various societal issues is incredibly small and incredibly…dated…



We. Told. Then. So.