Helen Andrews Explains How Feminization Is Destroying Civilization

Yes, imagine that.

Then imagine being so triggered you find a post from a month ago to get a zinger in
👍
“Yes, imagine that.
And imagine being so clueless you think replying late is some kind of crime. Where I’m from, we have a proverb: ‘"fool runs from justice, but justice for foolishness arrives right on schedule." You didn’t escape it, I just gave it a month’s head start. :D
 
This has been thoroughly debunked here. A sample:

. . . Are we supposed to find that swashbuckling masculine spirit of business in the sight of our manly tech tycoons groveling before Donald Trump? And let’s not get started on the rule of law under Trump, that supposed restorer of American manhood. Andrews points to the Title IX campus tribunals adjudicating sexual misconduct claims—often with egregious violations of due process and overbroad definitions of offenses—as the prime example of what to expect when the courts end up in female hands and the guilt of the accused is presumed based on empathy for the alleged victims. It’s an issue on which I have repeatedly written myself (and on which a good many feminists have spoken out); but unfair suspension or even expulsion from college seems rather trivial compared to, say, due process–free deportation to a gulag in El Salvador. Or to the president’s use of the Justice Department as his personal law firm and of federal prosecutors as his henchmen who can be fired if they decline to pursue the president’s vendettas against his personal enemies. . . .
Oh my, the grand opera of overwrought analogies, where campus kangaroo courts and tech-bro theatrics are somehow less serious than the imaginary gulags lurking in your political fan-fiction. You’re so desperate to sound profound that you ended up comparing Title IX show trials to El Salvadorian exile, like a man reaching for a sword and pulling out a squeaky balloon animal. And the idea that Trump “uses the DOJ as his personal law firm” is rich coming from the same political class that spent years treating federal prosecutors like a private militia for partisan crusades. Spare us the trembling outrage; your moral compass doesn’t spin, it wobbles, because you keep planting it in whatever rhetorical swamp suits today’s leftwing panic.
 
“Yes, imagine that.
And imagine being so clueless you think replying late is some kind of crime.
Nope ..just an indication of you being triggered.

Where I’m from, we have a proverb: ‘"fool runs from justice, but justice for foolishness arrives right on schedule." You didn’t escape it, I just gave it a month’s head start.
No you don't.
 

The Great Feminization​

Helen Andrews

October 16, 2025

In 2019, I read an article about Larry Summers and Harvard that changed the way I look at the world. The author, writing under the pseudonym “J. Stone,” argued that the day Larry Summers resigned as president of Harvard University marked a turning point in our culture. The entire “woke” era could be extrapolated from that moment, from the details of how Summers was cancelled and, most of all, who did the cancelling: women.

The basic facts of the Summers case were familiar to me. On January 14, 2005, at a conference on “Diversifying the Science and Engineering Workforce,” Larry Summers gave a talk that was supposed to be off the record. In it, he said that female underrepresentation in hard sciences was partly due to “different availability of aptitude at the high end” as well as taste differences between men and women “not attributable to socialization.” Some female professors in attendance were offended and sent his remarks to a reporter, in defiance of the off-the-record rule. The ensuing scandal led to a no-confidence vote by the Harvard faculty and, eventually, Summers’s resignation.

The essay argued that it wasn’t just that women had cancelled the president of Harvard; it was that they’d cancelled him in a very feminine way. They made emotional appeals rather than logical arguments. “When he started talking about innate differences in aptitude between men and women, I just couldn’t breathe because this kind of bias makes me physically ill,” said Nancy Hopkins, a biologist at MIT. Summers made a public statement clarifying his remarks, and then another, and then a third, with the apology more insistent each time. Experts chimed in to declare that everything Summers had said about sex differences was within the scientific mainstream. These rational appeals had no effect on the mob hysteria.

This cancellation was feminine, the essay argued, because all cancellations are feminine. Cancel culture is simply what women do whenever there are enough of them in a given organization or field. That is the Great Feminization thesis, which the same author later elaborated upon at book length: Everything you think of as “wokeness” is simply an epiphenomenon of demographic feminization.

Much more here: https://www.compactmag.com/article/the-great-feminization/

It's about, among other things, "warriors and worriers" and how “The rule of law will not survive the legal profession becoming majority female.”
It sounds like your poor, poor victim Larry Summers was more than simply anti-feminist. Sounds like he was also fine with sex trafficking women. Now he's the one canceling himself.

You sure know how to fall flat on your face with your MAGA talking points.
 
Back
Top