Harry Reid and Barack Obama want a government shutdown.

Like, uh, Republicans are bad.

These people have been had.

Everything they say is a lie.

They want us all to die.


:p :p :p
 
Makes you proud of the American Educational system that they take pride in their ignorance.

If you cannot speak in the the twerking manner of Miley Cyrus, no one can understand you...

:p

40 years ago a guy tried to convince me that work experience by itself was better than work experience plus classroom instruction combined. Light infantry weapons, for instance. In Vietnam we had morning classrooms for M16, M60, M79, and whatever the fuck a grenade was called, then we spent the afternoon in the field shooting and blowing up old cars and pickups.

Field-work is valuable, field-work with some book learning is valuable too.

But UDs conviction that Mao's little red book covers plumbing and roof repairs, is naïve.
 
As I pointed out in an earlier quote in this, or another thread, every one who dreams of Big Government as the Champion of Social Justice shares the same root fallacy, that they define Social Justice and that its administration will mirror the fantasy in their mind and that it will march right up to their doorstep but stop there and go no further.


In America, they first came for the very rich and I didn't speak up because I wasn't rich," said the Rev. Imadem Doinggood. "Then they came for the Bourgeoisie and I didn't speak up because I wasn't Bourgeois. Then they came for the Upper Middle Class blue-collar workers. I didn't speak up because I was a Government clerk. Then they came for me and there was no one left to speak up.
A_J, the Stupid

There is red and white, and if you refuse to believe that, then you will accept pink and let me tell you pink tends to red for when you say ∃ of anything is a good function of government then ∃ is everything ¬∀ and while you may be able to advocate for ∃ you won't be allowed to define it and in this manner its limit will be ∀ for f(∪∃)i [i=from you to the total population] will never tend to ∅ by definition so it is easy to see that it is, indeed, an ∀ or ∅ when it comes to government. (Now, the f(∩∃)i [i=from you to the total population] will tend to ∅ but that is politically unattainable for the obvious reason that the more ∃ is defined, the smaller the ∩∃ becomes.)
A_J, the Stupid
 
Last edited:
There is black and white, and if you refuse to believe that, then you will accept grey and let me tell you gray tends to black for when you say ∃ of anything is a good function of government then ∃ is everything ¬∀ and while you may be able to advocate for ∃ you won't be allowed to define it and in this manner its limit will be ∀ for f(∪∃)i [i=from you to the total population] will never tend to ∅ by definition so it is easy to see that it is, indeed, an ∀ or ∅ when it comes to government. (Now, the f(∩∃)i [i=from you to the total population] will tend to ∅ but that is politically unattainable for the obvious reason that the more ∃ is defined, the smaller the ∩∃ becomes.)
A_J, the Stupid


I notice that you selected 'tend to black' as your example of moving towards the more evil or worse state. Why was that?
 
I notice that you selected 'tend to black' as your example of moving towards the more evil or worse state. Why was that?

Because the light at the end of the tunnel might actually be an oncoming train?

I dunno.

Why did I not accept that the waking state was actually a dream state as my maternal grandfather believed? It just wasn't socially normative in the educational background which my thinking matriculated.

I might just as easily spoke in terms of red, white and pink, but that would get the panties of the red-diaper doper babies all in a wad...

But it might be more clear that way. I will consider the change.
 
Because the light at the end of the tunnel might actually be an oncoming train?

I dunno.

Why did I not accept that the waking state was actually a dream state as my maternal grandfather believed? It just wasn't socially normative in the educational background which my thinking matriculated.

I might just as easily spoke in terms of red, white and pink, but that would get the panties of the red-diaper doper babies all in a wad...

But it might be more clear that way. I will consider the change.

Wrong:

the correct response was: Humourless bitch.

You may need corrective and remedial classes.
 
No, I think this is still better...

There is black and white, and if you refuse to believe that, then you will accept grey and let me tell you gray tends to black for when you say ∃ of anything is a good function of government then ∃ is everything ¬∀ and while you may be able to advocate for ∃ you won't be allowed to define it and in this manner its limit will be ∀ for f(∪∃)i [i=from you to the total population] will never tend to ∅ by definition so it is easy to see that it is, indeed, an ∀ or ∅ when it comes to government. (Now, the f(∩∃)i [i=from you to the total population] will tend to ∅ but that is politically unattainable for the obvious reason that the more ∃ is defined, the smaller the ∩∃ becomes.)
A_J, the Stupid

;) ;) :p


[where :p denotes the twerk Miley]
 
As I pointed out in an earlier quote in this, or another thread, every one who dreams of Big Government as the Champion of Social Justice shares the same root fallacy, that they define Social Justice and that its administration will mirror the fantasy in their mind and that it will march right up to their doorstep but stop there and go no further.


In America, they first came for the very rich and I didn't speak up because I wasn't rich," said the Rev. Imadem Doinggood. "Then they came for the Bourgeoisie and I didn't speak up because I wasn't Bourgeois. Then they came for the Upper Middle Class blue-collar workers. I didn't speak up because I was a Government clerk. Then they came for me and there was no one left to speak up.
A_J, the Stupid

There is red and white, and if you refuse to believe that, then you will accept pink and let me tell you pink tends to red for when you say ∃ of anything is a good function of government then ∃ is everything ¬∀ and while you may be able to advocate for ∃ you won't be allowed to define it and in this manner its limit will be ∀ for f(∪∃)i [i=from you to the total population] will never tend to ∅ by definition so it is easy to see that it is, indeed, an ∀ or ∅ when it comes to government. (Now, the f(∩∃)i [i=from you to the total population] will tend to ∅ but that is politically unattainable for the obvious reason that the more ∃ is defined, the smaller the ∩∃ becomes.)
A_J, the Stupid

Ah, Social Justice. A wholly religious concept recently embraced by the secularists for enforcement by political means. Or to put it another way, a moral imperative turned into a blunt instrument to be used by the state to bludgeon anyone the state disagrees with.

Ishmael
 
Ah, Social Justice. A wholly religious concept recently embraced by the secularists for enforcement by political means. Or to put it another way, a moral imperative turned into a blunt instrument to be used by the state to bludgeon anyone the state disagrees with.

Ishmael
"When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living together in society, they create for themselves in the course of time a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that justifies it."

"Sometimes the law defends plunder and participates in it. Sometimes the law places the whole apparatus of judges, police, prisons and gendarmes at the service of the plunderers, and treats the victim - when he defends himself - as a criminal.”
Frédéric Bastiat


The Forgotten Man is "worthy, industrious, independent, and self-supporting. He is not, technically, 'poor' or 'weak'; he minds his own business and makes no complaint." Because of all of this, "the philanthropists never think of him and trample on him[.]"
William Graham Sumner (as quoted by Jack Kerwick)
 
Obama’s Confession of Indifference
The president has admitted that his strategy is to punish the innocent to score partisan points.
Jonah Goldberg, NRO
OCTOBER 11, 2013

Last week I wrote a column accusing the president of having a vindictive streak — of deliberately trying to make the lives of average Americans worse just so he could score ideological and political points.

We already knew from how he handled the budget sequester that Obama liked this approach. He ordered Cabinet secretaries not to do their jobs — i.e., to manage as best they could under spending restraints — but instead to find ways to make the cuts needlessly painful for innocents caught in the Beltway crossfire.

They dusted off the same playbook for the shutdown. As one park ranger told the Washington Times, “We’ve been told to make life as difficult for people as we can.”

Admittedly, the case was circumstantial. There was no smoking gun. What was really needed was a confession.

Obama delivered. On October 8, Obama was asked by Mark Knoller of CBS if he was “tempted” to sign the numerous funding bills passed by the GOP-controlled House that would greatly alleviate the pain of the shutdown. Republicans have voted to reopen parks, fund cancer trials for children at the NIH, and to keep FEMA and the FDA going through this partial shutdown. But Obama has threatened to veto any such efforts, effectively keeping the Senate from considering the legislation.

“Of course I’m tempted” to sign those bills, Obama explained. “But here’s the problem. What you’ve seen are bills that come up wherever Republicans are feeling political pressure, they put a bill forward. And if there’s no political heat, if there’s no television story on it, then nothing happens.”

Obama’s answer dragged on, as all of Obama’s answers do. But the point was made. For the first time in American history, a president confessed to deliberately hurting his country to score points against his enemies.
 
For the first time in American history, a president confessed to deliberately hurting his country to score points against his enemies.

Liberals don't mind!
 
It's amusing watching AJ and Miles suddenly profess their empathy for those folks adversely impacted by teh shutdown.

It's almost as if they wanted everyone here to think that they actually cared.
 
For the first time in American history, a president confessed to deliberately hurting his country to score points against his enemies.

Liberals don't mind!

Yes, but it will hit theirs just as well and we have reserves...


;) ;)
 
Let's see how many of them agree with Goldberg's statement. Ooops...I forgot...they don't wake up this early.

It is always the fault of the Republicans.


:cool:

They made Obama mean.

People do not tell little Barry no; there are consequences to be had.

Look at the way he talked about his typical white grandmother after she died; he never forgives or forgets...
 
In other words, when asked to make a judgment call, and knowing that Congress wanted the benefits paid, this administration still claimed its hands were tied by the fine print. Given how often the White House routinely ignores the plain meaning of the law — and the will of Congress — when it suits its political agenda, logic dictates that it denied the benefits on purpose.

Moreover, by its own account, the White House says it knew for weeks this would happen. During all the back-and-forth, the White House did nothing to remedy the situation. It only sprang into outraged action when suddenly faced with a PR nightmare.

“The president was very disturbed to learn of this problem,” Carney told the press Wednesday. And once he did learn of it, Carney insisted, he ordered the Defense Department and the Office of Management and Budget to fix the problem “today.”

When Fox News White House correspondent Ed Henry asked Carney when the president found out, Carney indignantly refused to answer. It’s not hard to guess why: because the president either knew all along, or his underlings believed they were following his plan.

Let me say it again. The president confessed. It’s his express policy to punish innocent bystanders in order to score partisan points. That order has gone forth like a fatwa to the bureaucracy. And it is only when that policy blows up in his face that Obama becomes “very disturbed.”

When terrible things happened on George W. Bush’s watch — Katrina, Abu Ghraib, etc. — the immediate liberal response was to insist that Bush had in fact ordered or wanted the terrible things to happen.

Now we have a president openly admitting it — and no one seems to care.
Jonah Goldberg

The Obamanation continues its 180 spiral into becoming Bush.
 
I see that life continues here in bizarro world where you guys try and blame Obama and the democrats.

You're like a bunch of crazy people in an asylum convincing each other that reality is whatever you decide it should be.

Funny stuff. Keep the comedy coming. :D
 
I see that life continues here in bizarro world where you guys try and blame Obama and the democrats.

You're like a bunch of crazy people in an asylum convincing each other that reality is whatever you decide it should be.

Funny stuff. Keep the comedy coming. :D

Our tax dollars build and operate happy homes, and since Liberals frown at using them for Democrats we're using them as sanctuaries from feral Democrats. Mine is called Fort Jesse.
 
Our tax dollars build and operate happy homes, and since Liberals frown at using them for Democrats we're using them as sanctuaries from feral Democrats. Mine is called Fort Jesse.

Tomatos are technically fruits but feral republicans often eat waffles for breakfast.
 
For the first time in American history, a president confessed to deliberately hurting his country to score points against his enemies.

Liberals don't mind!

Not one bit, Miles Ben Zonah.

This crisis was manufactured out of whole cloth by Republicans.

An up-or-down vote on the Clean CR can end this crisis in 24 hours, a fact that you and Goldberg seem unwilling or unable to admit.
 
Back
Top