Hanns...get in here.

Intrigued.....

One thing I have always said in a post of mine is doing what you are comfortable with. So hence this is what you are comfortable with then be it.

Originally you were comfortable with posting yourself and that is fine. Your pictures were tastefully done. It reminded me of drawings from the Lueve (spelling wrong) and so many other pieces of art from museums I visited across Europe. A thing of beauty, do not allow one person who is full of hatred make you doubt that ever.

So many people in society have views on what is beautiful and what is not. It is all in the eye of beholder. I made the realization when I saw so many drawings in history that your size was beauty through the beginning of time until several decades ago. Only within the last couple of decades did it seize to be so. You looked healthy and happy and that is what is important.

Can we help it that some men or women desire extremely thin people that some are even to the point of looking unhealthy. This is not a statement to belittle petite or tiny people. I am referring to the Olive Oil look and the lollipop head. I am referring to the ones that look as if they could have been in a concentration camp, so unhealthy. To that extreme I am referring to. Then there are others that want a lot of meat on their lover. People that want to have that feeling of something to hold on to. Intrigued you did not fit into either extreme of the categories but looked as if to be in the middle. Your artwork though average size showed so much sensuality and beauty. It is all a matter or choice and preference.

It does irk me that some men and women are so vain with their interpretation of what they find to be beauty. In a way Madison Ave. has brained washed them. Sensuality and beauty is not the way one looks but the way they hold themselves. It is an awe that they emanate and elude. It is not about a person’s size because if that is all it is truly about what he or she is worried about then good luck to him or her. It is vain and what they need to show on the outside to get approval from what others might think. Their insecurity! For what comes around goes around. Looks fade and what not. It only shows their sense of self worth for they place so much emphasis on how their partner looks and not worrying about his or her feelings. That they are so unsure of oneself that they have to follow the trend of what “society” places to be beautiful. The lack of ability and power to think for oneself but to allow the Madison Avenue syndrome to take over his/her finding a person that enhances who they are.

So Intrigue I commend you on your decision and the way you went about it. You did it on your own terms. I know you did not pull them cause of what another choose to say but because you already had shared them. I am sure you had more positive feedback from them than the negative ones. It was just time to change and that is all. Perhaps you will take more in the future and share them once again on this forum. If you do not choose to share them then it is only the boards loss to view another creature with such a wonderful heart, sensuality, and beauty. Again that is your comfort level.

Again you did this so eloquantly and I thank you for this.

Peace,
Tulip
 
Geez tulip. What a beautiful thing to say to me...I am very touched. Listen, I am nothing more than a raging hormone right now, and things being said elsewhere are on my mind, so I think I need to just shut up. Nothing is going to improve or change, so anyway, I really appreciate this, you said quite alot, and I'll always remember.
 
Hugs to you Intrigue....

some battles are not worth fighting for. For those who know and love ya will not falter. So take a time out and do something for yourself. Do what so many of us are tying to do "ignore" feature works.

Re evaluate what is on you mind and let the very intsy bitsy petty stuff go. It is not worth it in the realm of things where there a so many others that think positively of you. Then post away to those you enjoy in here. Simple.

Peace,
Tulip
 
lol thanks zipman7


i actually think hanns is surprising quite insecure ... remember his poem thread he was asking people if they thought the poem "informer" (aka hanns) did was good

also when he setup that fake lit site which obviously took quite a while he was asking people which bits they found funny


you have to remember that hanns is a person behind the persona we see there's a person typing all that stuff i doubt he's anything like the hanns we see
 
Hanns,

I would say that if you are counting votes (as you have been regarding PMs) then intrigued has won Hanns, so back down and back away.

Leave the woman alone for God's sake. Why does it matter to you what she writes or posts here? How does she effect your life?

It's easy to sit behind your computer and behave as you are. You certainly have no corner on the meanness market however, so stop thinking you are so special and witty.
 
Last edited:
sexy-girl said:
lol thanks zipman7


i actually think hanns is surprising quite insecure ... remember his poem thread he was asking people if they thought the poem "informer" (aka hanns) did was good

also when he setup that fake lit site which obviously took quite a while he was asking people which bits they found funny


you have to remember that hanns is a person behind the persona we see there's a person typing all that stuff i doubt he's anything like the hanns we see

You're welcome! Even though there is a person behind the persona, I think the fact that anyone would create that persona is more than proof of psychological issues. I don't think he's at all dangerous, just very disturbed. No well-adjusted person would choose to behave the way he does.

Hanns has probably even convince himself that this is all a joke, but his need to interact with people in this manner are a clear signal of psychological problems. Yes, he does need validation from people, and when he is "spurned" his anger and feelings of rejection are quite real.
 
Problem Child said:
This thread is worth another week or two of Hanns.

Good job folks.
I was thinknig something similar. Just more fodder for him to spew his shit with.
 
hann's tactics are to attack someone he thinks people will wish to defend ... thats why hes attacking intrigued now he knows people will defend her

when you defend her though you're actually giving hanns what he wants and not doing intrigued any favours
 
Problem Child said:
This thread is worth another week or two of Hanns.

Good job folks.
pretty much was the point I was making. Is it nap time here in kindergarden land?
 
Hanns_Schmidt said:
You think this is mean

I'll turn up the heat a notch

Look at the lonely loser......Hannsy Pannsy why don't you come and play with me....I will help you with that bed wetting problem....:eek:
 
Hanns_Schmidt said:
bitch, you're ugly and old.


Almost as old as Intrigued.


Are your tits pointing as far down south as hers?


-------

I'm wondering why certain lesbians seem obsessed with me

Wow Hannsy come on don't be embarressed about that bed wetting problem....I know the boys in the barracks gave you a hard time....But really I promise to help....Come here little Pannsy.....:kiss:
 
I know I'm not alone when I say I :heart: you, intrigued.

While I may be disappointed at the loss of your outer physical beauty on Lit, if you believe what you've done to be the right thing, I can't argue with it.

Besides, the rest of you, the stuff that makes you you, is still here, and that's fine by me. ;)

TB4p
 
Hanns is clueless.

The lady uses a fake name, as do we all. Why would she or anyone use a real picture?

Whether it actually was a picture of Intrigued or not is irrelevant. Only the most gullible idiot would believe that it was.
 
now it's not her pictures? that's why she spazzed out and almost had heart failure right?

don't post pictures or personal info unless you want it biting you in the ass later. simple concept.
 
This thread roxxxxxx! I nevedr in my life have been so entertained! Where O where did this woman go? This boards desperately needs her back, and right soon.

ya dig?
 
Back
Top