Gas Station Owners Allege Price Fixing

Le Jacquelope

Loves Spam
Joined
Apr 9, 2003
Posts
76,445
<neo cons> price fixing ought to be legal! won't somebody think of the billionaires! oh woe are the oil execs, they'll have to go from buying 500 mansions a day to 499, oh woes!!! let's stick it to the fucking commuters! </neo cons>

Did I miss any potential response here?

http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/070822/gas_station_lawsuit.html?.v=4&printer=1

AP
Gas Station Owners Allege Price Fixing
Wednesday August 22, 10:31 am ET
By Rachel Konrad, AP Business Writer
Nearly 2 Dozen Calif. Gas Station Owners Allege Price Fixing by Shell, Chevron

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) -- Nearly two dozen gas station owners in California sued Shell Oil Co., Chevron Corp. and Saudi Refining Inc., on Tuesday, claiming the companies conspired to fix prices for 23,000 franchise owners nationwide.

The case filed in U.S. District Court in San Francisco seeks class-action status for the plaintiffs. It is similar to another lawsuit filed in 2004 by other California gas station owners that was thrown out by the U.S. Supreme Court last year. The new group of plaintiffs hopes the court will consider a slightly different argument.

Like the previous case, the plaintiffs in this case say chairmen of the three oil companies met privately nearly every month starting in March 1996 for the "purpose of forming and organizing a combination." The lawsuit alleges executives destroyed documents from the meetings, and a now-defunct joint venture violated U.S. antitrust laws and caused artificially high wholesale gas prices in nearly every state from 1999 to 2001.

In a new twist, the plaintiffs now say the venture violates a "rule of reason" governing antitrust matters.

A Chevron spokeswoman, Stephanie Price, said the San Ramon-based company has not seen the lawsuit and she couldn't discuss specifics. She did say Chevron, which acquired Texaco Inc. in 2001, was vindicated last year when Chief Justice John Roberts blasted the previous case for its "very artificial hook."

The lawsuit hinges on a marketing deal that, plaintiffs say, allowed former rivals to collude on prices starting in 1998, when Shell and Texaco Inc. formed Equilon Enterprises LLC to market gasoline in western states. They formed Motiva Enterprises LLC later that year for the eastern half of the country. Houston-based Saudi Refining also joined Motiva.

Equilon and Motiva began operating when inflation-adjusted crude oil prices hit their lowest levels since the Great Depression, according to San Francisco-based lawyer Joseph M. Alioto, who represented plaintiffs in both the old and new cases. Yet gas prices soared for franchise owners, forcing them to pass on the cost to consumers or cut profit margins.

"These executives get together and say, 'OK, we're going to raise Texaco's price to Shell's price, then we're going to raise both of them 50 to 75 percent, and we're going to do it after we've already had all these cost savings,'" Alioto said.

The lawsuit doesn't seek a specific financial award. Alioto argues wholesale prices were higher by at least 20 cents a gallon and possibly as much as 40 cents per gallon from 1999 to 2001.

Since an average gas station in the United States pumps about 100,000 gallons per month, Alioto says the energy companies owe each of the 23,000 station owners at least $240,000.

Station owners had little choice but to pay higher prices. Franchises typically sign long-term contracts with oil suppliers, making it tough to switch to another brand or an independent supplier.

A spokesman for the state-owned oil company of Saudi Arabia, of which Saudi Refining is a subsidiary, said they had received no official notification of a lawsuit. Representatives did not return phone calls and e-mails to Houston-based Shell, a subsidiary of the Royal Dutch/Shell Group.

The case is Madani v. Shell, C07-4296-MEJ.
 
On a note not necessescarily directly related to the article you posted, but I find it interesting that the price of gas has come down at least $0.40 in the last few months. Especially when you consider it was around the same time that Congress was pushing to pass legislation related to oil company profits.
 
esorm66 said:
On a note not necessescarily directly related to the article you posted, but I find it interesting that the price of gas has come down at least $0.40 in the last few months. Especially when you consider it was around the same time that Congress was pushing to pass legislation related to oil company profits.
Shut yo' mouth.
 
Interesting. I remember the shocked disbelief of the cons in here when it was suggested last autumn that a handful of very powerful men could shift prices prior to the last election in order to favor the Republicans in the polls.

It'll be interesting to see how this plays out.
 
esorm66 said:
What the matter, make too much sense for you?
LOL no, actually when I say "shut yo mouth" I mean the Republopigs will have a heart attack when they read that.
 
sigh said:
Interesting. I remember the shocked disbelief of the cons in here when it was suggested last autumn that a handful of very powerful men could shift prices prior to the last election in order to favor the Republicans in the polls.

It'll be interesting to see how this plays out.
The powerful people may have turned out to be the Democrats in Congress.

And on top of that, all that talk about fuel efficient and alternative fuel cars may have been the last straw.
 
LovingTongue said:
LOL no, actually when I say "shut yo mouth" I mean the Republopigs will have a heart attack when they read that.

Sorry, didn't mean to be snide. Let the Republopigs have a heart attack. While we're on the subject I'm not too fond of Democraps either.
 
I'm not sure if you were one of them but weren't you blaming speculators for the rising cost in gasoline? Unless of course the speculators are the oil companies named in the article.
 
SleepingWarrior said:
I'm not sure if you were one of them but weren't you blaming speculators for the rising cost in gasoline? Unless of course the speculators are the oil companies named in the article.
The speculators are always a part of the problem, but the oil companies are throwing gasoline *ahem* onto an already raging fire.
 
Anyone notice all the lame-brained excuses that the companies have made just to keep the prices high?

The best one was last month on how the LACK OF OIL REFINERY WORKERS is forcing the U.S. oil companies to reduce the amount of oil products produced in the US

The last one was how expensive it is to change from winter blends to summer blends. What a croc. I know that when gas and diesel goes below a certain temperature it will gel, but there are two points that I find remarkable....

1. What about in the warmer areas of the US....do they have to switch too?

2. How is NOT HAVING TO ADD A ADDITIVE more expensive that adding it?
 
Back
Top