Biden's Favorite Inflation Talking Point Thoroughly Debunked

Rightguide

Prof Triggernometry
Joined
Feb 7, 2017
Posts
64,388
Joe and Nancy like to showcase their total ignorance of economics and monetary inflation:

Dems’ Favorite Inflation Talking Point Just Got Debunked In Epic Fashion

THOMAS CATENACCIENERGY & ENVIRONMENT REPORTER
May 12, 2022

The Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas rebutted a popular claim from Democrats that fuel prices are surging as a result of price gouging by oil companies.

Alleged price gouging from Big Oil companies is not among the number of factors causing record high gasoline prices nationwide, senior Dallas Fed economists Garrett Golding and Lutz Kilian wrote in a blog post Tuesday. While it is true crude oil prices have declined at various points over the last several months while fuel prices remained high, gasoline costs aren’t often set by oil drillers and are affected by other expenses like rent and credit card fees, they argued.

“Gas station operators set retail prices based on their expected acquisition cost for the next delivery of fuel from the local distributor, federal and state tax rates, and a markup that covers operating expenses, such as rent, delivery charges and credit card fees,” the Fed officials wrote.

“Since only 1 percent of service stations in the U.S. are owned by companies that also produce oil, U.S. oil producers are in no position to control retail gasoline prices,” they continued. (RELATED: ANALYSIS: White House Keeps Misleading Public On Oil, Gas Leasing. Here Are The Facts)

Democrats, though, have repeatedly blamed Big Oil for the high gasoline prices, arguing that the companies are exploiting the Ukraine crisis to pad their profits. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Thursday that the House would vote next week on the Consumer Fuel Price Gouging Prevention Act introduced by Democratic Reps. Kim Schrier and Katie Porter on May 6.

https://dailycaller.com/2022/05/12/democrats-inflation-big-oil-price-gouging/

PS: Oil and Gas industry profit margins:

[TR]
[TD]2021 8.7%[/TD]
[TD]2020 -50.2%[/TD]
[TD]2019 -5.8%[/TD]
[TD]2018 3.4%[/TD]
[TD]2017 -12.6%[/TD]
[TD]2016 -53.6%[/TD]
[/TR]
 

You Literally Can't Believe The Facts Tucker Carlson Tells You. So Say Fox's Lawyers​

  • NPR
September 29, 20204:34 PM ET

Now comes the claim that you can't expect to literally believe the words that come out of Carlson's mouth. And that assertion is not coming from Carlson's critics. It's being made by a federal judge in the Southern District of New York and by Fox News's own lawyers in defending Carlson against accusations of slander. It worked, by the way...

Just read U.S. District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil's opinion, leaning heavily on the arguments of Fox's lawyers: The "'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that [Carlson] is not 'stating actual facts' about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in 'exaggeration' and 'non-literal commentary.' "

https://www.npr.org/2020/09/29/9177...s-tucker-carlson-tells-you-so-say-fox-s-lawye

------------

I enjoy investigating different points of view, but I demand honesty from a political commentator. It is one thing for the commentator to make assertions I wish were not true. It is something else for the commentator to make assertions that are not true. The lies of Rush Limbaugh were documented as early as 1994.
 
Last edited:

You Literally Can't Believe The Facts Tucker Carlson Tells You. So Say Fox's Lawyers​

  • NPR
September 29, 20204:34 PM ET

Now comes the claim that you can't expect to literally believe the words that come out of Carlson's mouth. And that assertion is not coming from Carlson's critics. It's being made by a federal judge in the Southern District of New York and by Fox News's own lawyers in defending Carlson against accusations of slander. It worked, by the way...

Just read U.S. District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil's opinion, leaning heavily on the arguments of Fox's lawyers: The "'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that [Carlson] is not 'stating actual facts' about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in 'exaggeration' and 'non-literal commentary.' "

https://www.npr.org/2020/09/29/9177...s-tucker-carlson-tells-you-so-say-fox-s-lawye

------------

I enjoy investigating different points of view, but I demand honesty from a political commentator. It is one thing for the commentator to make assertions I wish were not true. It is something else for the commentator to make assertions that are not true. The lies of Rush Limbaugh were documented as early as 1994.
It worked for Maddow as well.
 
You read fox news well
The link came from the Daily Caller, but I have a sense of compassion for the indolent awash in self-pity and too remiss to excel at reading comprehension. :rolleyes:
 
Tucker started the Daily Caller, and I’m sure that they continue to observe his standards.
 
The link came from the Daily Caller, but I have a sense of compassion for the indolent awash in self-pity and too remiss to excel at reading comprehension. :rolleyes:
Yep...and daily caller poached it off of fox news.
 
Back
Top