Former youth organizer for AOC busted after urging ‘attack’ on Jewish students at Brooklyn public high school

Even Richard Lynn himself thought Richard Lynn was a racist. He literally identified as a "scientific racist", and he was editor in chief of a white supremacist journal, Mankind Quarterly. In other words, you are not helping your case at all here.
Richard Lynn documents his arguments thoroughly. So does Charles Murray:

"Jewish Genius," By Charles Murray Commentary April 02, 2007​


As soon as Jewish children born under legal emancipation had time to grow to adulthood, they started appearing in the first ranks of the arts and sciences. During the four decades from 1830 to 1870, when the first Jews to live under emancipation reached their forties, 16 significant Jewish figures appear. In the next four decades, from 1870 to 1910, the number jumps to 40. During the next four decades, 1910–1950, despite the contemporaneous devastation of European Jewry, the number of significant figures almost triples, to 114.

To get a sense of the density of accomplishment these numbers represent, I will focus on 1870 onward, after legal emancipation had been achieved throughout Central and Western Europe. How does the actual number of significant figures compare to what would be expected given the Jewish proportion of the European and North American population? From 1870 to 1950, Jewish representation in literature was four times the number one would expect. In music, five times. In the visual arts, five times. In biology, eight times. In chemistry, six times. In physics, nine times. In mathematics, twelve times. In philosophy, fourteen times.

Disproportionate Jewish accomplishment in the arts and sciences continues to this day. My inventories end with 1950, but many other measures are available, of which the best known is the Nobel Prize. In the first half of the 20th century, despite pervasive and continuing social discrimination against Jews throughout the Western world, despite the retraction of legal rights, and despite the Holocaust, Jews won 14 percent of Nobel Prizes in literature, chemistry, physics, and medicine/physiology. In the second half of the 20th century, when Nobel Prizes began to be awarded to people from all over the world, that figure rose to 29 percent. So far, in the 21st century, it has been 32 percent. Jews constitute about two-tenths of one percent of the world’s population. You do the math.

https://www.aei.org/articles/jewish-genius/
 
What you call genocide I call winning a war Hamas started,

The Jews are the Herrenvolk.

BrightShinyGirl does not have blood and soil support for the Children of Israel and the Land of Israel. I do.
How does Brightshiny girl not have it and you do?
You’re not even Jewish, Youre not an indigenous people to the land, you are not a prospective target of hatred because of your connection to the land.
 
Hamas didn't start the war though. I hate to tell you but history didn't start 10/6.
There have been many wars. The first was in 1947 - 1948, when the fledging state of Israel was attacked by the entire Arab world. The entire world suffered a well deserved defeat, and lost territory to Israel. One would think that the Palestinians would have learned from the record of Israeli victories, but no, they started the present war October 7, 2023. Once again, the Palestinians are losing big time.
 
Last edited:
How does Brightshiny girl not have it and you do?
You’re not even Jewish, Youre not an indigenous people to the land, you are not a prospective target of hatred because of your connection to the land.

BrightShinyGirl does not think the Ashkenazim are the Herrenvolk. I do. Jews are humble about their superiority. Because I am a Christian Judeophile I discuss Jewish genius. Jews are good at everything they do. During the turn of the last century Jewish men even excelled as boxers.

 
Last edited:
There have been many wars. The first was in 1947 - 1948, when the fledging state of Israel was attacked by the entire Arab world. The entire world suffered a well deserved defeat, and lost territory to Israel. One would think that the Palestinians would have learned from the record of Israeli victories, but no, they started the present war October 7, 2023. Once again, the Palestinians are losing big time.

They are definitely losing. However claiming Israel hasn't been constantly waging war on them for years is just false.
 
How does Brightshiny girl not have it and you do?
You’re not even Jewish, Youre not an indigenous people to the land, you are not a prospective target of hatred because of your connection to the land.
oh look, Noor Teh Perpetual Victim.
She openly celebrates the starvation of innocent children for political purposes and continue to wonder why oh why do people persecute us Jews?
 
It's equally accurate to say they never proved their points in the first place. That (along with their racist theses) was why their peers didn't buy their arguments.
I am less familiar with the writing of Richard Lynn. I have read The Bell Curve and other writing by Charlas Murray. For over a century IQ tests have accurately predicted academic and financial success. No method has been found to significantly and permanently raise the IQ of a person who scores poorly on an IQ test at the age of seven.

Charles Murray presents equalitarians with an existential challenge. Because they cannot disprove his assertions they have often succeeded in making it dangerous to publicly agree with him.

This is a scientific issue, not a moral issue. Feelings should never interfere with the search for scientific truth.
 
Charles Murray presents equalitarians with an existential challenge. Because they cannot disprove his assertions they have often succeeded in making it dangerous to publicly agree with him.
The issue is not that his peers "cannot disprove his assertions," it's that they never had a chance to address them in the first place. We've been over this before: Murray did not submit The Bell Curve for peer review before it was published. After it was published, most experts in the field strongly disputed its findings. What you really mean by "cannot disprove his assertions" is "cannot convince John Engelman he was wrong". That is quite different.
 
The issue is not that his peers "cannot disprove his assertions," it's that they never had a chance to address them in the first place. We've been over this before: Murray did not submit The Bell Curve for peer review before it was published. After it was published, most experts in the field strongly disputed its findings. What you really mean by "cannot disprove his assertions" is "cannot convince John Engelman he was wrong". That is quite different.
Name books that have been peer reviewed. Stephen J. Gould's The Mismeasure of Man is often considered to be a rebuttal of The Bell Curve, but it was not peer reviewed.

I have told you what would convince me that I am mistaken. All it would take would be a way to permanently and significantly raise the IQ scores, academic performance, and prosperity of people who scored poorly on IQ tests at the age of seven.
 
Murray did not submit The Bell Curve for peer review before it was published. After it was published, most experts in the field strongly disputed its findings.

What seems to be going on here is that you dispute EVERYTHING. Not because it's wrong, but because you refuse to accept the possibility that it might be correct and in that correctness disprove all you believe in and stand for.
 
Back
Top