food stamps

bra_man69

Literotica Guru
Joined
Aug 29, 2003
Posts
7,410
ASSOCIATED PRESS

Democrats failed Wednesday to block cuts to the food stamp program as the House Agriculture Committee moved ahead on a half-trillion-dollar bill to fund farm and nutrition programs over the next five years. Similarly, a Republican attempt to make deeper cuts to the program was defeated.

The program that helps feed 46 million people at a cost of nearly $80 billion a year, about 80 percent of farm bill spending, was the dominant issue as committee members tried to advance one of the larger and more expensive bills that Congress is taking up this year.

The committee's draft measure would save $3.5 billion a year from current spending levels through such steps as ending the practice of direct payments for inactive farmers and consolidating conservation programs. Of that, $1.6 billion in savings would come from tightening eligibility rules and ending abuses in the food stamp program.

The Senate version of the farm bill passed last month on a bipartisan vote would save about $2.3 billion a year, with $400 million coming from the food stamp program. The House and Senate must reach a compromise before the current farm bill expires at the end of September.

The panel defeated, on a 31-15 vote, a proposal by Rep. Jim McGovern, D-Mass., that would have eliminated all the proposed cuts to food stamps, which he said would "literally take food away from hungry people."

But Republicans pointed to the sharp rise in food stamp beneficiaries, from 19 million in 2002 to 46 million a decade later.

Later, half of the 26 Republicans on the committee joined Democrats in a 33-13 vote to defeat an amendment by Rep. Tim Huelskamp, R-Kan., to double the food stamp cuts.

Several Republicans acknowledged that deeper cuts would make it harder to reach a compromise with the Democratic-led Senate. Rep. Michael Conaway, R-Midland, said, "We will have squandered our one really good chance of getting beyond" the level of cuts in the Senate bill, which would trim food stamp spending by $400 million a year.
 
Here in Schlub County the poor get their free food from the churchs, and use the food stamps for the steaks and Cokes and snax.
 
Here in Schlub County the poor get their free food from the churchs, and use the food stamps for the steaks and Cokes and snax.

The average recipient gets about $130 per month. Compare that with how much the average 'farmer' gets from the Bill.
 
Next time copy and paste it all not just the nigger part.

bra_man69 to Zumi said:
Your the one that gives it a meaning.
No other person can tell you how to think.
nigger nigger nigger

Doesn't make it any better. If you think it does, you're dumber than I thought.
 
I support food stamps and feel strongly that the debit cards should only be used for food and related items. No beer and not to be used at a Casino.

The basis behind food stamps is sound. Family need help and should get it. No child should suffer
 
Food stamps should be cut a lot more then this. For that matter so should the farm subsidies for growing corn and a bunch of other crops.

Massachusetts legislature is arguing with our governor about restricting EBT (the food stamp debit card recipients get) so that "buys of guns, porn, tattoos, jewelry and manicures" are prevented. That is not feeding hungry people. The Governor is bleeding heart liberal and vetoed the restriction.
 
Most college students on financial aid qualify for food stamps. This is an important thought because with the lack of paying jobs, just to pay off their student loans, they will likely be getting food stamp benefits for quite a bit longer after graduation.

I really hate how both sides tout their jobs bill this and job reforms that. Its not the quantity of jobs people need its getting back the jobs that pay enough to support their families without needing a government handout.

And when it comes down to feeding your kids, would you rather them starve while you work three jobs to try to feed them, or take the hit to your ego for the government hand out?

Also, you can't buy guns, tattoos, or any of that crap with food stamps. You can't even buy toilet paper, toothpaste, or aluminum foil. Just food products.

Just a shitty time all around.
 
Last edited:
Food stamps should be cut a lot more then this. For that matter so should the farm subsidies for growing corn and a bunch of other crops.

Massachusetts legislature is arguing with our governor about restricting EBT (the food stamp debit card recipients get) so that "buys of guns, porn, tattoos, jewelry and manicures" are prevented. That is not feeding hungry people. The Governor is bleeding heart liberal and vetoed the restriction.

That's not about food stamps, it's about welfare which is different. A person is typically free to spend welfare money as they see fit whereas food stamps can only be spent on food.
 
The average recipient gets about $130 per month. Compare that with how much the average 'farmer' gets from the Bill.

The amount doesnt nullify my point. The poor get their free food from local churchs then use the food stamps for steak and crap. They usually have a knocked up teen to qualify for milk etc.
 
That's not about food stamps, it's about welfare which is different. A person is typically free to spend welfare money as they see fit whereas food stamps can only be spent on food.

You are wickid smaht.

A lot of the reporting I have been reading is about it being "food stamp money" but they just put the food stamp money and the welfare money on the same "EBT" card now. So it is the cash TANF benefit and not the SNAP this is being effected like you said.

But while looking closer at the programs it makes me think even more that both programs need cuts. You can withdraw cash like an ATM and spend it on whatever you want (according to the state EBT website) so all this shit is just hot air.

How about no cash withdrawals and rather than say what is banned, only allow it for a few necessary purchases?
 
Back
Top