Finally a serious question about 2nd Ammendmet

[unregistered]

 

[Disgustipated]

Oh, stop kissing Kyle's ass.

[/QUOTE

:kiss;

 

[unregistered]

 

[1sickbastard]

The French were your partners. Your Codified system of law and republic structure all influenced by France. The Statue of Liberty was a gift from France. I could go on...



Canada on the other hand remained loyal to the British and our superior system of Government was the result.



http://www.parl.gc.ca/About/Parliament/SenatorEugeneForsey/book/chapter_4-e.html

You are such a Canadian patriot, I'll bet do all your cross-boarder shopping only at American malls which fly a Canadian flag.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

~View Post Koala Style~

Tell me something ass wipe, how many of the 11,000 homicides were justifiable?

Roughly the same amount of people die on the highways every year in their permitted, licensed, and registered, automobiles...ya fucking hemorrhoid. Oh, and there is no right to drive a car, like there is to be armed, so do fuck off. ~Back to Iggy~

PS: Stuff your irrelevant suicide numbers.

Cars are heavily regulated. Do you also believe guns should be regulated?

Gun ownership is not a right, it is a privilege.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Well, you better go back and read both again. They both identify rights that can, in fact, be taken away.
Unless your next claim is that the writers and signers of them accidentally used the word "right" when they really meant "privilege".

Just because you assign me a position that I've never taken does not mean I have to read anything again.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Gun ownership is not a right, it is a privilege.

Not according to the highest law of the land in which we reside derpina.
http://i3.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/243/561/afc.gif

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Not according to the highest law of the land in which we reside derpina.
http://i3.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/243/561/afc.gif

You're wrong. A right can not be taken away, a privilege can.

 

[Colonel Hogan]

Coastal boy has no understanding of the concept of "pre-existing," after all HuffPo never mentioned it.

It's not even that. I've finally lost all patience with people who are so fucking arrogant that they literally embrace stupidity as a way of life and call it wisdom just to see how often they can get away with it.

He didn't just make an argument against the Court's decision. That would have been rational. He actually denied the very substance of the decision that was made. Said it was the opposite of what was actually decided.

It's like 9/11 truthers. It isn't enough for them to declare that our own government did it. They have to try and sell the idea that all those people on the planes didn't die. They landed safely somewhere else and are being held incommunicado.

Obviously, the sensible thing is to just ignore them, but I"m finding it harder to let their idiocy go unchallenged.

 

[coastal-boy]

~View Post Koala Style~

Tell me something ass wipe, how many of the 11,000 homicides were justifiable?

Roughly the same amount of people die on the highways every year in their permitted, licensed, and registered, automobiles...ya fucking hemorrhoid. Oh, and there is no right to drive a car, like there is to be armed, so do fuck off. ~Back to Iggy~

PS: Stuff your irrelevant suicide numbers.

I'm not the one that thinks any murder is "justified".

As for the suicide numbers, obviously, I touched a sore chord. If someone close to you has committed suicide, I am sorry. But I believe that easy access to guns is partially to blame to the staggering numbers. No other developed country has these rates. Why?

 

[HAL_9000]

Guns are already regulated.

You can't go buy a .50 cal, mount it on the back of your pickup, and drive down Main Street shooting up in the air. Even on a major holiday.

This isn't Afghanistan.

 

[coastal-boy]

I strongly suggest you kiss my fucking ass, shithead.

I can't help it you were too fucking stupid to realize that your cut and paste supported my argument and not yours. Your response is reward enough.

 

[coastal-boy]

He actually denied the very substance of the decision that was made. Said it was the opposite of what was actually decided.

I quoted the decision you provided word for word. It explicitly states what I was saying.

 

[HAL_9000]

It's not even that. I've finally lost all patience with people who are so fucking arrogant that they literally embrace stupidity as a way of life and call it wisdom just to see how often they can get away with it.

He didn't just make an argument against the Court's decision. That would have been rational. He actually denied the very substance of the decision that was made. Said it was the opposite of what was actually decided.

It's like 9/11 truthers. It isn't enough for them to declare that our own government did it. They have to try and sell the idea that all those people on the planes didn't die. They landed safely somewhere else and are being held incommunicado.

Obviously, the sensible thing is to just ignore them, but I"m finding it harder to let their idiocy go unchallenged.

The only reason 9/11 "truthers" exist is because our government hides so many things behind a curtain of media disinformation.

Then again, it has been proven over and again that the general population is very far from being able to handle the truth.

 

[coastal-boy]

Obviously, the sensible thing is to just ignore them, but I"m finding it harder to let their idiocy go unchallenged.

So instead, you decide to respond by saying "I strongly urge you to kiss my ass".

That is some concept of "challenging" you have there. I'm truly amazed by your intellect.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Guns are already regulated.

You can't go buy a .50 cal, mount it on the back of your pickup, and drive down Main Street shooting up in the air. Even on a major holiday.

This isn't Afghanistan.

Should gun use be regulated in the same way that driving a car is?

 

[eyer]

Hey, Frizzle Fried:

I believe I remember you posting that if the 2nd is repealed, you'll obey...

...is that correct?

 

[BotanyBoy]

You're wrong. A right can not be taken away, a privilege can.

WELL COME ON DOWN BOSS MAN!!!
http://th05.deviantart.net/fs70/PRE/f/2010/195/2/4/Come_and_Take_It_by_darthdilbert.png

3 Army Rangers and a Navy Corpsman living in this house....I fucking dare you.... might want to call the national guard first, tell them to bring air support/heavy armor...they are going to need it.

 

[marshalt]

You're wrong. A right can not be taken away, a privilege can.

Every single "right" can be taken away under the right circumstances. So according to you, we have no rights at all.

 

[HAL_9000]

Should gun use be regulated in the same way that driving a car is?

Isn't it already?

In most cities, it's illegal to discharge a firearm.

Just like it's illegal to park wherever you want.

 

[HAL_9000]

WELL COME ON DOWN BOSS MAN!!!


3 Army Rangers and a Navy Corpsman living in this house....I fucking dare you.... might want to call the national guard first, tell them to bring air support/heavy armor...they are going to need it.

save it for the chicom invasion...

 

[unregistered]

 

[BotanyBoy]

save it for the chicom invasion...

http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lqopihxgre1qja042.gif

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Isn't it already?

In most cities, it's illegal to discharge a firearm.

Just like it's illegal to park wherever you want.

You didn't answer the question.

 

[unregistered]