COVID-19 RESOURCES
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

E. Jean Carroll to sue trump for sexual battery under new 'adult survivors law'

liable for battery and defamation, not rape, and agrees she was sexually abused by trump in the store but did not find enough preponderance of evidence to be able to find him liable for rape

$2m-ish for the attack, more for defamation
 
butters said:
liable for battery and defamation, not rape, and agrees she was sexually abused by trump in the store but did not find enough preponderance of evidence to be able to find him liable for rape

$2m-ish for the attack, more for defamation
Click to expand...
Prediction, write this down. Immediate appeal and she won't see a penny of that 5 million bucks.
 
Oooh….”Right”guide made another prediction.

That ^ always end well…..

👉 “Right”guide 🤣

🇺🇸
 
there's the ongoing case still to come, where Carroll is suing for a ballpark figure of $10M, which covers the issues of her losing her job because of his damage to her reputation. His spiteful, petty, ugly remarks post the jury finding him liable for sexual assault/battery, have now been added to the ongoing lawsuit:

They said in the rewritten lawsuit that he “doubled down” on derogatory remarks about Carroll at a cable television appearance a day after the verdict.

“Trump’s defamatory statements post-verdict show the depth of his malice toward Carroll since it is hard to imagine defamatory conduct that could possibly be more motivated by hatred, ill will, or spite,” the lawyers wrote. “This conduct supports a very substantial punitive damages award in Carroll’s favor both to punish Trump, to deter him from engaging in further defamation, and to deter others from doing the same."
Click to expand...

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/e...1&cvid=d2a2da4d8e1345e890062966854ecc3a&ei=18
 
butters said:
there's the ongoing case still to come, where Carroll is suing for a ballpark figure of $10M, which covers the issues of her losing her job because of his damage to her reputation. His spiteful, petty, ugly remarks post the jury finding him liable for sexual assault/battery, have now been added to the ongoing lawsuit:



https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/e...1&cvid=d2a2da4d8e1345e890062966854ecc3a&ei=18
Click to expand...
Trump is stark raving GENIUS

Has he never been read his rights?

Never watched a single court case on tv?

Ignorance is not a defense! And yet this genius has pulled off ignorance many many times

Soon? His answer will be “I don’t recall!”
Problem ? It’s on tape and two, he is not the actor that Ronald Reagan was!!
 
Trump can't be enjoying a single moment of his life, being continuously carved by the thousand knifes from every position on multiple levels--all because of his own inanity. No matter whether he can spin out seeing the inside of a prison cell before he dies, he is already existing in a prison. He deserves no less.
 
Come on and pony up Republicans...pay your leader's 10 million he owes. Otherwise you are just so un-American
 
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opin...1&cvid=8848a9930bbd4d62b20b32bd68b191a2&ei=57

A lengthy memorandum, which took into account the two separate lawsuits Carroll had filed against the ex-president, acknowledged that the "only point on which Ms. Carroll did not prevail was whether she had proved that Mr. Trump had 'raped' her within the narrow, technical meaning of a particular section of the New York Penal Law."
Click to expand...
"The jury's unanimous verdict in Carroll II was almost entirely in favor of Ms. Carroll," the opinion continued, adding, "The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was 'raped' within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump 'raped' her as many people commonly understand the word 'rape.' Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that."
Click to expand...

https://storage.courtlistener.com/r...d.590045/gov.uscourts.nysd.590045.212.0_1.pdf
The jury’s unanimous verdict in Carroll II was almost entirely in favor of Ms.Carroll. The only point on which Ms. Carroll did not prevail was whether she had proved that Mr.Trump had “raped” her within the narrow, technical meaning of a particular section of the New York Penal Law – a section that provides that the label “rape” as used in criminal prosecutions in NewYork applies only to vaginal penetration by a penis. Forcible, unconsented-to penetration of the vagina or of other bodily orifices by fingers, other body parts, or other articles or materials is not called “rape” under the New York Penal Law. It instead is labeled “sexual abuse.”1
Click to expand...

As is shown in the following notes, the definition of rape in the New York Penal Lawis far narrower than the meaning of “rape” in common modern parlance, its definition in somedictionaries,2in some federal and state criminal statutes,3and elsewhere.4 The finding that Ms. 1“Sexual abuse” involving sexual contact by forcible compulsion (sexual abuse in the firstdegree) nevertheless is a felony punishable by a term of imprisonment and requiring sexoffender registration. N.Y. Penal Law §§ 70.02(1)(c) (sexual abuse in the first degree is aClass D violent felony), 3(c) (“For a class D felony, the term must be at least two years andmust not exceed seven years . . ..”); N.Y. Correct. Law §§ 168-a(3)(a)(i) (defining“exually violent offense” to include a conviction of sexual abuse in the first degree), 7(b)(defining “exually violent offender” as “a sex offender who has been convicted of asexually violent offense defined in subdivision three of this section”).
Click to expand...


One dictionary, for example, defines rape as “unlawful sexual intercourse or any other sexual penetration of the vagina, anus, or mouth of another person, with or without force, a sex organ, other body part, or foreign object, without the consent of the person subjected to such penetration.” “[R]ape,” Dictionary.com, https://www.dictionary.com/browse/rape (last accessed July 14, 2023) (emphasis added). The most recent edition of Black’s Law Dictionary defines rape in part as “nlawful sexual activity (esp. intercourse) with a person (usu[ally] a female) without consent and usu[ally] by force or threat of injury” and Case 1:22-cv-10016-LAK Document 212 Filed 07/19/23 Page 3 of 594
Click to expand...
lots more after this

 
Last edited:
E. Jean Carroll asks federal judge to rule trump 'cannot claim he did not sexually assault her in an upcoming defamation trial.' The new trial is to ascertain how much he has to pay for defamation, not allow him to deny his guilt of the court-determined 'sexual assault'.

"Trump cannot, for instance, claim that he did not sexually assault Carroll; argue that he was telling the truth in his statements about her; suggest that Carroll fabricated her account due to a political agenda, financial interests, or mental illness; or offer any other testimony that would be inconsistent with the Court's collateral estoppel decision determining that Trump, with actual malice, lied about sexually assaulting Carroll."
Click to expand...
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...&cvid=98daebfea56c49dee22f88e79dd04f70&ei=171
 
trump having historic meltdown before commencement of trial, posting 71 items about her within 2 tantrums during a 9 hour period:

Over the span of about 30 minutes Thursday morning, Trump made 31 posts about Carroll on Truth Social. Although he didn’t say anything himself, he shared stories from conservative outlets attacking her and comments from internet users calling her “creepy.” He also shared media interview clips and social media posts that appear to come from Carroll, all stripped of context so as to paint her as some sort of sexual deviant.
Click to expand...
https://newrepublic.com/post/177875/trump-losing-it-e-jean-carroll-case
To be sure, it was unsettling to see the former president use his social media platform to go after Carroll so furiously over the course of 28 minutes. (The tirade began at 10:45 a.m. eastern, and wrapped up at 11:13 a.m. eastern.)
Click to expand...
But then Trump did it again about nine hours later, publishing 40 additional items to his online platform. Most featured this text: “Except for a Fraudulent Case against me, I had no idea who E. Jean Carroll was. She called her African American Husband an ‘ape,’ and named her Cat ‘Vagina.’ Look at her Tweets, Stories, and the CNN Interview about her. The Judge on the Case is another Highly Partisan Clinton-Appointed Friend. He should have recused himself long ago!”
Click to expand...
The Republican published this exact same message, word for word, over and over and over and over and over and over again for nearly hour.
Click to expand...
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...&cvid=68323a77d40143e7b89fb78fb1757c1e&ei=172
 
Apart from having a striking resemblance to the daughter he wants to spend quality time with, how in the world did Habba get the job of defending Trump? She's never been a trial lawyer, her only experience has been writing letters on behalf of a parking garage to angry customers.

I suppose this is what happens when you're stuck with the 'no win - no fee' end of the market.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Rightguide
Jack Smith’s Case Against Trump Appears to Be Falling Apart
6 7 8
Replies
181
Views
1K
Rightguide
Rightguide
Rick345
Maybe someone can explain this to me
2 3 4
Replies
83
Views
1K
Fuzzy1975
F
adrina
  • Poll
Should DOJ defend Trump in defamation suit by E Jean Carroll?
2 3
Replies
69
Views
3K
Dribble
Dribble
LincolnDuncan
Presidents licenced to rape, murder, pillage while in office
Replies
5
Views
655
pecksniff
P
PayDay
Adventures In the Legal System
Replies
5
Views
1K
PayDay
PayDay
Back
Top