Does the Left want US to loose in Iraq?

busybody said:
He never mentioned Niger, did he?

He said Africa and as my long C n P from the Intel shit showed

it was correct

Fuck Off


You said....................I'm pretty sure he made a reference to it in one of his State of the Union..........................SHOW ME WHERE HE SAID NIGER!

You're right, he said Africa, but ... I hope this doesn't come as a shock to you ... Niger is a COUNTRY in AFRICA, a country probably deliberately PLANTED in Africa by LEFTISTS who hate AMERICA for that very purpose. What a CONSPIRACY!

Bush quote:

During the 2003 State of the Union speech, U.S. President George W. Bush said, "The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa." The British claim could not be substantiated with evidence.

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellowcake_Forgery
 
PatPowers said:
You're right, he said Africa, but ... I hope this doesn't come as a shock to you ... Niger is a COUNTRY in AFRICA, a country probably deliberately PLANTED in Africa by LEFTISTS who hate AMERICA for that very purpose. What a CONSPIRACY!

Bush quote:

During the 2003 State of the Union speech, U.S. President George W. Bush said, "The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa." The British claim could not be substantiated with evidence.

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellowcake_Forgery
Google "dodgy dossier". It would be funny if it wasn't so fucked up.
 
PatPowers said:
During the 2003 State of the Union speech, U.S. President George W. Bush said, "The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa." The British claim could not be substantiated with evidence.

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellowcake_Forgery
But it was SUBSTANTIATED by the US Senate

and I posted the news up there :rolleyes:
 
SeanH said:
Yep, the doctors tried to remove shrapnel from the patient, obviously suspiscious, that. :rolleyes:
They had a spectrometer in the Hospital? Fuck me, Israel's hospitals are well equipped!
well THAT wasnt the essential point now was it?

According to Daniel, Israel found that the composition of the metal shrapnel
does not match the metal composition of Israeli artillery shells. Final
analysis of the metal has not been completed.
 
busybody said:
wazhazhe said:
That was just a reprint of the US SENATE REPORT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I give abount the same creedence to a report by the republican controlled senate report trying to bail out an incompitent republican president as I do to a report written soley by the Conservative Party of the UK to serve their own interests. That's the Butler Report, just in case you can't figure it out.
 
busybody said:
According to Daniel, Israel found that the composition of the metal shrapnel
does not match the metal composition of Israeli artillery shells. Final
analysis of the metal has not been completed.
So how did he reach his conclusion? Telepathy?
 
Beco said:
Oh come on, give him a chance......

He's had six years to fuck things up and shows no sign that he has a clue as to what is happening, much less an answer.
 
busybody said:
But it was SUBSTANTIATED by the US Senate

and I posted the news up there :rolleyes:

And shown to be a lie. Or didn't you read my previous post on that.
 
wazhazhe said:
busybody said:
I give abount the same creedence to a report by the republican controlled senate report trying to bail out an incompitent republican president as I do to a report written soley by the Conservative Party of the UK to serve their own interests. That's the Butler Report, just in case you can't figure it out.
See, I did write that,

The US Senate LIES!

:rolleyes:
 
wazhazhe said:
He's had six years to fuck things up and shows no sign that he has a clue as to what is happening, much less an answer.
he still has another two left on his term, come on, a little leeway dude...
 
wazhazhe said:
And shown to be a lie. Or didn't you read my previous post on that.
I did

and it didnt EXACTLY say what you wanted it to say

U) On October 2, 2002, the Deputy DCI testified before the SSCI. Senator Jon Kyl asked the Deputy DCI whether he had read the British white paper and whether he disagreed with anything in the report. The Deputy DCI testified that "the one thing where I think they stretched a little bit beyond where we would stretch is on the points about Iraq seeking uranium from various African locations. We've looked at those reports and we don't think they are very credible. It doesn't diminish our conviction that he's going for nuclear weapons, but I think they reached a little bit on that one point. Otherwise I think it's very solid."

(U) On October 4, 2002, the NIO for Strategic and Nuclear Programs testified before the SSCI. When asked by Senator Fred Thompson if there was disagreement with the British white paper, the NIO said that "they put more emphasis on the uranium acquisition in Africa than we would." He added, "there is some information on attempts and, as we said, maybe not to this committee, but in the last couple of weeks, there's a question about some of those attempts because of the control of the material in those countries. In one case the mine is completely flooded and how would they get the material. For us it's more the concern that they have uranium in-country now. It's under inspection. It's under control of the IAEA - the International Atomic Energy Agency - but they only inspect it once a year." The NIO told Committee staff that he was speaking as an IC representative and was representing INR's known view on the issue. He said at the time of his remarks, he did not believe that the CIA had any problem with the credibility of the reporting, but said the CIA may have believed that the uranium information should not be included in an unclassified white paper.
 
wazhazhe said:
busybody said:
In case you didn't notice, they're politicians. Lying is what politicians do for a living.
Only the Repoz!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

But when the DumOZ said the same thing when ClitMan bombed Iraq and Sudan in 1998 THAT was the TRUTH! :rolleyes:
 
wazhazhe said:
busybody said:
In case you didn't notice, they're politicians. Lying is what politicians do for a living.
Only the Repoz!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

But when the DumOZ said the same thing when ClitMan bombed Iraq and Sudan in 1998 THAT was the TRUTH! :rolleyes:
 
SeanH said:
How did he analyse the shrapnel?
How the fuck do I know?

I assume he MADE it up

Jews LIE

Palis tell the truth

Remeber the Jenin Massacre....................It really happened. I know the UN and the Palis said so!
 
I'm not a democrat. All politicians lie. It's in the job description.
 
wazhazhe said:
I'm not a democrat. All politicians lie. It's in the job description.
But Boo-row-craps DONT??????????????

So you BELIEVE the QUOTE above from your guy at the CIA?

Cause he aint no PolyTICKtion and he dont lie!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I get it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :rolleyes:
 
busybody said:
How the fuck do I know?

I assume he MADE it up
The point,BB, is how the fuck does HE know.
But the credibility of your sources has never really bothered you, has it? And so we come full circle to the start of this whole discussion.
 
who is the HE you refer to? :confused:

On the other hand, you believed INSTANTLY what the Palis said................knowing that in the past

They have made shit up
 
busybody said:
who is the HE you refer to? :confused:

On the other hand, you believed INSTANTLY what the Palis said................knowing that in the past

They have made shit up
The He is Daniel.
So the IDF have never, ever lied? The Israeli government has never, ever lied?
 
SeanH said:
The He is Daniel.
So the IDF have never, ever lied? The Israeli government has never, ever lied?
I dint say that, did I?

Israel Television
Channel Two military correspondent Ronnie Daniel

I assume SOMEONE told him

You know, like someone tells the NYTimes there are secret prisons in Euro-pee

And they are never found!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Back
Top