Debbiexxx

A_Jacks

Literotica Guru
Joined
Sep 10, 2001
Posts
624
I'm calling you out.

We had ample time to discuss this matter.

Why not contain it to the original thread?

You may be a Dixon Carter Lee fan (he checks for his name) but why bring it to the general board unless you are one of my allies? Are you for Pedophiles or are you against them?

Are you willing to join the chorus that says they [all high school girls] are eighteen, and are you willing to go to bat for all those men who were high school teachers and coaches who are now currently imprisoned for having sex with minors?

Since you have been having sex since you were fouteen, then you do hold the men blameless since you wanted to give it away?

If you really want to talk to me.
 
Why did I bring it to the board?
Because I was upset by your libelous words and the fact that you are basing your prejudice against DCL on a fictional story as proof.

Your statement "We had ample time to discuss this matter."
implies to me that you intend this matter to drag on. I don't.

Am I a fan of Dixon Carter Lee's? No, in fact till you started your ranting I had not read his stories but I have now. In fact lots of people probably have now.

I am a mother myself. I believe in justice, morality, the protection of children so that they can grow up in a safe environment with no sexual, physical or mental abuse and a lot of other important issues. I try to be the best person I can be. My conscience is clear.

But I am also a writer, a great way to express myself. I write erotica as well as other sorts of writing. I am horrified that people would read my stories and assume that I am a paedophile or a pervert. It is fiction. This has been my point all along.

I realize now that I was wrong in calling you out. But I stand up for what I believe in. As you claim you do.

For me the matter ends here. I like the people here and respect that some have pm'ed or emailed me saying that you are enjoying this attention. So I do not retreat nor withdraw but simply say

"Choose your battles well."

Be the best that you can be for yourself, your children, family, friends, your community, your country, your fellow man, for all.

This battle of words with you has been pointless in the face of the tragedy of September 11th. 2001. I have wept many times on that day and since.
I have my perspective back but do not regret standing up for others.
 
the difference between a jacks and kidrock 1 is the fact that a jacks is scarey and psychotic
kidrock 1 is juvenile .
talk about a 1 track mind , in this country the legal age of consent is 16 does that mean if i post a story about a 16 year old having sex with a 17 year old on a board in the us i am condoning paedophilia?
get a fucking life!
 
Age of consent may be 16. The former local football coach is in jail for having sex with a 17 year-old. Another one was sentenced to jail in Joplin this week for having sex with a seventeen year old.

Both consentual relations uncovered by a third party.

So much for that theory. But if you really believe it, act on it. Let me know the results. I would be very curious.

To say the least.
 
Debxxx

That's cool.

I understand what you say about the 11th, but in America, people are over-reacting and vociferously expressing the willingness to trade freedom for security.

The want more money in law enforcement. More police, more monitering the web. A certain story can the go from being the toast of the board to a chink in the armor of the valuted first amendment guarantees.

That makes the discussion even more topical.

Again. Trying to be consitent, not psychotic. As an athlete, I have found being obsessive about things has lead to great success. I have found that what happens in the tenth round can be much more important than any beatings you take in the first and second rounds, and we are just entering the third round, and every round is a new round...
 
A_Jacks said:
Age of consent may be 16. The former local football coach is in jail for having sex with a 17 year-old. Another one was sentenced to jail in Joplin this week for having sex with a seventeen year old.

Both consentual relations uncovered by a third party.

So much for that theory. But if you really believe it, act on it. Let me know the results. I would be very curious.

To say the least.
there is a difference between the age of consent and abusing a position of trust be it pupil/ teacher [a teacher got 18months this week] or doctor /patient.
you seem to have a real hangup on this issue , what are you trying to tell us here , is the real issue some abuse you have suffered? are you telling us that it doesnt go on in china , or more importantly, it doesnt GET REPORTED in china
 
Save your words

A_J is incapable of debating rationally, imho, but rather picks out of any post what he wishes. He seems not to have the will or the ability to look at a post in it`s entirity and reply to that.

QED : When you say age of consent he quotes off some case in ???? Joplin ???? Your point will go unanswered pablo, why bother?

A_J, think happy, positive thoughts....you never know where it might lead you
 
i normally answer to unregistered posts , but i find a jacks disturbing in his fascist style of writing , thanks for the comment
 
Applause

debbiexxx said:
For me the matter ends here. I like the people here and respect that some have pm'ed or emailed me saying that you are enjoying this attention. So I do not retreat nor withdraw but simply say

"Choose your battles well."



Bravo, Debbie! ~applause~

Now, let's play nice together or ignore one another, please!
 
Oh A_jacks is really experienced with the horrors of terrorism ! You got a lot of fucking nerve to say this country is overreacting to what's happened on Sept 11! Just because you didn't lose somebody at the WTC or maybe you don't give a shit about other people's feelings, doesn't give you a right to be an asshole! I'm surprised you're out on your own A_jacks off, aren't supposed to be busy following Sparky Kronkite around?
 
Quote from A_Jack's
"Yeah, I threw myself into the breach. DCL was plain and simply trolling another member, so I decided turn about was fair play. Then I actualy read his story for the first time and was shocked and appalled that it was one of the paragons of Lit, and appearantly, a sacred relic by the way everyone here acts. But consistency is the key.

Nessus. Remember Outlaw Josey Wales, I bring my words of death so you know my words of Life are true.

I provided Laurel and Manu with a direct link showing who I am in RL, what I do, what I am capable of. I gave them the ammunition to expose me in RL in order to show the sincerity of my motives.

Laurel is so very concerned about her first amemnment rights (even though she is tepid at best to protecting my fourth amendment rights) and stories like DCL's gives the authorities a back door to silence her rights. That is what I continually point out.

I also pointed out the graciousness and strength of Dubya when everyone here was all over him. How's that vandalism case progressing Laurel? Still want his head? I pointed out that given time, he would win America over. Right Lavy? As early as last October, I was all over the board talking about the oncoming reccession and how to protect yourself and family financially."



Shaking my head at the village idiot.
 
DCL has turned to unregistered to fight his battle.

Why do I have an issue with this?

It was the chink in DCL's armor and the key to his character flaw. Plus I teach young people and I know how quickly they put someone of trust on a pedastle.

Even though we have done all that we can to kill off heroes in America, children still look to us.

I care not to condone stories that try to turn a high school teacher/pupil scenario into a dating scenario.

And I am interested in how JG is more ofensive than TP, although I must admit, I only scanned it to find if it fit the parameters of my own attack, which, I will repeat once more, was a direct response to DCL's unceasing trolling of Todd which was getting pedantic at best.
 
Back
Top