ChatGPT to write erotic stories? Your opinion?

[sweetdreamssss]

Would you use ChatGPT(if it can) to write your stories in case you feel that writing is tedious?

What would be your opinion if you read a very good story and it ended up being written by ChatGPT?

Do you think writers should declare ahead that they used chatgpt to partially or completely write their stories?

Should Literotica block chatgpt stories just like porn site block AI generated porn?

There are no right or wrong answers for this, there can only be opinions. Its like lab generated meat.

 

[Jackie.Hikaru]

Lit's policy on AI

 

[geronimo_appleby]

i'm still using a quill and blood...

 

[ElectricBlue]

Recent discussion thread, same topic:

ChatGPT and writer's block

 

[stickygirl]

Pretty soon all sex will be banned, the uber-rich will decide how to manage their crop of humans.

If someone thinks the process of writing a story is waving a credit card at a keyboard, you are already dead. If you're having to pose the question at all, you're not far away from being permanently jacked in. Run now, before it's too late.

Recent discussion thread, same topic:

ChatGPT and writer's block

^ Thread cloning. It's a thing

 

[Voboy]

^ Thread cloning. It's a thing

…apparently.

This topic has already gotten old. What’s this, three threads on this now?

 

[Bramblethorn]

…apparently.

This topic has already gotten old. What’s this, three threads on this now?

With apologies:

prompt: "write a forum discussion where people complain about seeing too many posts about ChatGPT"

Subject: Over saturation of ChatGPT posts

Hello everyone,

It seems like lately all we see on this forum are posts about ChatGPT. Don't get me wrong, I think it's a great tool, but it's starting to feel like it's all we talk about.

Has anyone else noticed this trend? I'd love to see more diverse topics and discussions on here.

What are your thoughts on this?

Best regards,

[Your Name]

---

Replies:

[User 1] I completely agree. It's getting to the point where I'm tired of seeing the same thing over and over again. I joined this forum to learn and discuss different things, not just ChatGPT all the time.

[User 2] I'm with you guys. I think it's important to acknowledge the potential benefits of ChatGPT, but there's more to the tech world than just this one tool. Can we please branch out and have a more varied discussion?

[User 3] I have to say, I'm starting to get a little annoyed with the constant stream of ChatGPT posts too. It seems like every time I log on, there's a new one. Can we take a break and talk about something else for a change?

[User 4] I understand where you're coming from, but let's not forget that ChatGPT is a big deal right now in the tech community. It's important to stay informed about the latest developments and advancements. Maybe we can strike a balance between discussing ChatGPT and exploring other topics as well?

What do you all think? Let's start a healthy discussion!

 

[Zenith77]

i'm still using a quill and blood...

When you say 'still', is there another way?

 

[onehitwanda]

When you say 'still', is there another way?

a quill and someone else's blood.

 

[Altissimus]

With apologies:

prompt: "write a forum discussion where people complain about seeing too many posts about ChatGPT"

And the next Lit Competition: write an erotic story based on people complaining about seeing too many posts about ChatGPT.

 

[LongDraw]

I tried to get ChatGPT to write a blurb for my book. I got an entire screen of warnings why the developers think I'm a horrible person LOL!

 

[KeithD]

I just saw an explanation for what this is. This isn't the author writing under his/her own steam, so I don't think it's relevant to the writing process.

 

[Duleigh]

Most AI's have been developed in the past 5 or 6 years making them far too young to be accessing this site. Their developers should be ashamed of themselves for allowing their fledgling AI access to an adult erotica site.

 

[oneagainst]

On the subject, just read this from New Scientist - if you think the publish/review cycle is hard now, what happens if the same fate befalls Lit? Laurel could autofilter, I guess, using grammar check... anything that falls below a certain score *must* be from a human...?

 

[KeithD]

On the subject, just read this from New Scientist - if you think the publish/review cycle is hard now, what happens if the same fate befalls Lit? Laurel could autofilter, I guess, using grammar check... anything that falls below a certain score *must* be from a human...?

What we've already seen from writing-help programs has shown that it would be many decades before any computer program could get the grammar perfect for fiction in the English language. The language itself is so mushy in standardization and fiction so varied in presentation that good luck to any computer program getting it perfect for generations to come.

 

[Voboy]

What we've already seen from writing-help programs has shown that it would be many decades before any computer program could get the grammar perfect for fiction in the English language. The language itself is so mushy in standardization and fiction so varied in presentation that good luck to any computer program getting it perfect for generations to come.

I doubt it will take nearly that long.

These things tend to improve exponentially. I doubt it'll be longer than about five or six years before the AI is good enough to get there. Perhaps sooner.

 

[ElectricBlue]

On the subject, just read this from New Scientist - if you think the publish/review cycle is hard now, what happens if the same fate befalls Lit? Laurel could autofilter, I guess, using grammar check... anything that falls below a certain score *must* be from a human...?

Right now you just need to read the fifth or sixth sentence along. It might have a vague relationship with the first sentence, but there'll be blindingly obvious logic gaps along the way. Plus that endless repetition, as if the damn program is lulling you into thinking it thinks.

I saw a piece in the press the other day, about the Chinese balloon. I'd swear it was sourced from ChatGPT, because it was going on as if the event was a kid's party, written by a twelve year old. Not a serious think piece, which it should have been.

 

[KeithD]

I doubt it will take nearly that long.

These things tend to improve exponentially. I doubt it'll be longer than about five or six years before the AI is good enough to get there. Perhaps sooner.

Those who will be around in five or six years will see, I guess.

 

[Jmanchu]

ChatGPT is kind of limited in terms of imagination for writing stories in the way I want to write them, but it does come up with good ideas for potentially helping to flesh out characters and settings. And it's surprised me with how good it can analyze the emotional aspects of a story and the character development the characters go through when I've asked ChatGPT to review some passages of one of my WIP stories. I think ChatGPT is better as a writing aid, which it excels at, than it is for outright writing stories especially long stories. Short stories it could probably do though.

 

[ycym]

On the subject, just read this from New Scientist - if you think the publish/review cycle is hard now, what happens if the same fate befalls Lit? Laurel could autofilter, I guess, using grammar check... anything that falls below a certain score *must* be from a human...?

Oh damn... my email spam filter will not work anymore... until now every email with too much mistakes will go to the trash.

 

[sealius]

Hey so I actually built it... lol. If anyone wants to see what ChatGPT erotica looks like, check it out here:

[link redacted. Please don't post links to personal sites within the body of posts. - AH Mod]

I think it's pretty fucking hot, TBH, I work in AI and I'm super surprised by how good it is.

 

[tenyari]

Pretty soon all sex will be banned, the uber-rich will decide how to manage their crop of humans.

On that note... Back in the late 1800s it was a notion among wealthy tycoons that people needed to be made to work 7 days a week all day long or all the peasants would do is satiate carnal lust and of course... plot rebellion. But mostly the lust.

I suppose you could use ChatGPT to write out the plot line of a non-erotic tale, and the rewrite it to include the erotic elements. That would work from some genres like action or science fiction or such. But if there's a constant sex, romance, or erotic angle in the story it might be difficult.

For example if I was putting out a CMNF story (clothed male, nude female) - part of the thrill is constantly reminding the reader that the protagonist is naked around all these clothed people. So I'd want to construct whole scenes around the hijinks that causes. A puritanical chatAI is going to fail me there. But if I'm writing "John Strapping; Prepper-Hero-Man in the Galaxy of losers and his private harem on girls named Mindy, Cindy, Wendy, Brandy, and Candy that conquer the universe to set up his benevolent dictatorship" as about half the Sci-Fi erotica I miss click on seems to be - I could probably do 90% of the story with a chat bot.

 

[sealjan]

ChatGPT is more pious than a nun. They scold you for any sexual content, so how can one possibly write erotica in their presence?

If you use it in the browser experience, yes. But if you use the API, it writes ridiculously dirty stuff. Just check out ********** and see for yourself. That is ChatGPT in action!

 

[Voboy]

That's three times you've shilled your own website.

Classy.

 

[tenyari]

Well that guy might be promoting their thing but it was something I wasn't aware of.

A bit of looking in duckduckgo and I've found:

https://beebom.com/how-build-own-ai-chatbot-with-chatgpt-api/

https://openai.com/blog/introducing-chatgpt-and-whisper-apis

However it looks like all versions of this require you to pay them by the wordcount. I don't see the ability to just local install it like I can with Stable Diffusion.