But Her E-mails!

[RobDownSouth]

I see that the resident retard has turned this into a "Defend the Orange God King at all costs" thread. What a fucking freak.

I thought for sure he'd be barking at Chief Justice John Roberts' thundering bitchslap of Trump earlier today.

Guess he's waiting for Hannity to provide him his talking points.

 

[Carnal_Flower]

His argument seems to be it's ok to go 120 mph on the highway (against the law) as long as you don't kill someone.

The car crash is not the crime; speeding is, and Ivanka got caught exactly like Hillary. No different.

I see that the resident retard has turned this into a "Defend the Orange God King at all costs" thread. What a fucking freak.

 

[BotanyBoy]

And? That's the one thing you're clinging to in order to keep defending Deplorable hypocrisy?

That's the one thing Clinton clung to in order to stay out of prison.

Good enough for both of youz and the other (D)'s? Good enough for me.

Keep ascribing those positions to me. That's what small people like you do. (see also: Que consortium).

Well you seem to have a major issue with anyone who points it out.

If that's not your position and you aren't a partisan elitist then you either have to give Ivanka a pass like Hillary, in which case you'd just be an elitist or join team "Lock her up"

His argument seems to be it's ok to go 120 mph on the highway (against the law) as long as you don't kill someone.

Not at all...that's your fantasy.

My argument is for equal treatment under the law.

If a service member military or civilian slips up and puts a classified map on his thumb drive or takes a selfie with the classified piece of gear in he background and does 10 years for it because zero tolerance then HRC needs to go the fuck to prison and if Ivanka took classified shit? So should she.

I want the elitism to stop. I just don't think it will because people on both sides, like you, are ok with it as long as it's their team doing it.

The car crash is not the crime; speeding is, and Ivanka got caught exactly like Hillary. No different.

Let's pretend that's true....and it's not because classified makes a difference!!

But let's pretend in your fantasy where being classified or not makes no difference......you're in the same position as Rob.

You either have to join team "lock her up" or give Ivanka a pass like Hillary.

Or just own up to your partisan hypocrisy. Brilliant you two....fuckin' brilliant.

 

[Carnal_Flower]

I never gave a flying fuck about Hillary's e-mails and I don't give a flying fuck about Ivanka's. But then, I never claimed to, and I never chanted Lock Her Up. Both probably committed some minor infraction. Who gives a fuck. It's totally inconsequential.

But THAT is not the point of this thread. This thread is explicitly about how the Lock Her Up crowd explains THEIR hypocrisy. It's their issue, their inconsistency. It doesn't matter what I or any Dem thinks about it. They took a moral stand with Hillary and they cannot extend the same stand to their own--except Dawn and HisArpy. They stepped up to the plate. The rest including you exploded into defensiveness and whataboutism.

Because of your hateful partisan hackery, you jumped to the defense of the Deplorables while still desperately trying to turn this around on Dems. It's not our issue. We didn't elect a Prez because of anyone's e-mails. They own this, not us.

If the next Dem President institutes a child separation policy and Dems stay silent, you can come back and say something. Meanwhile you're nothing but a bottom feeding partisan turd.

That's the one thing Clinton clung to in order to stay out of prison.

Good enough for both of youz and the other (D)'s? Good enough for me.



Well you seem to have a major issue with anyone who points it out.

If that's not your position and you aren't a partisan elitist then you either have to give Ivanka a pass like Hillary, in which case you'd just be an elitist or join team "Lock her up"



Not at all...that's your fantasy.

My argument is for equal treatment under the law.

If a service member military or civilian slips up and puts a classified map on his thumb drive or takes a selfie with the classified piece of gear in he background and does 10 years for it because zero tolerance then HRC needs to go the fuck to prison and if Ivanka took classified shit? So should she.

I want the elitism to stop. I just don't think it will because people on both sides, like you, are ok with it as long as it's their team doing it.



Let's pretend that's true....and it's not because classified makes a difference!!

But let's pretend in your fantasy where being classified or not makes no difference......you're in the same position as Rob.

You either have to join team "lock her up" or give Ivanka a pass like Hillary.

Or just own up to your partisan hypocrisy. Brilliant you two....fuckin' brilliant.

 

[BotanyBoy]

I never gave a flying fuck about Hillary's e-mails and I don't give a flying fuck about Ivanka's.

You trying to lie to me or yourself??

You started a thread about them....drawing a false equivalency so you could rage about Trump and make up wild lies about me.

But THAT is not the point of this thread. This thread is explicitly about how the Lock Her Up crowd explains THEIR hypocrisy.

There has been no hypocrisy.

Because of your hateful partisan hackery,

Which you have yet to establish.

you jumped to the defense of the Deplorables while still desperately trying to turn this around on Dems.

I'm not defending deplorable or trying to turn anything on dems.

If Ivanka's emails are classified, making it at least close to what Hillary did, then you'll have a case.

But until then it's a false equivalency.

 

[bestone4ever]

I thought for sure he'd be barking at Chief Justice John Roberts' thundering bitchslap of Trump earlier today.

Guess he's waiting for Hannity to provide him his talking points.

BotanyBottomBitch and Trump are used to people laughing at and bitchslapping them.

 

[BotanyBoy]

BotanyBottomBitch and Trump are used to people laughing at and bitchslapping them.

I'm used to idiots like you thinking they've done that....

 

[bestone4ever]

I'm used to idiots like you thinking they've done that....

We've had at least 3 discussions where you were shamed, retard. Just thank me for still bothering with you and shut the fuck up.

 

[BotanyBoy]

We've had at least 3 discussions where you were shamed, retard.

https://media1.tenor.com/images/22d9689453caf1cd8e4da60495038966/tenor.gif?itemid=9467035

Name calling doesn't shame anyone but yourself bubba.

 

[gotsnowgotslush]

Matt Whitaker Suggested the Trump Administration Should Prosecute Hillary Clinton

NOVEMBER 20, 2018

McGahn, who recently left the White House, held the line against Trump’s desire to weaponize the Justice Department. But there is someone in Trump’s circle who has long been an advocate of prosecuting Clinton: Matt Whitaker, Trump’s controversial pick to replace Jeff Sessions as acting attorney general.

Trump has insisted he wasn’t aware of Whitaker’s anti-Mueller views before placing him in charge of the Justice Department—though Whitaker had repeatedly voiced that position during cable television appearances. After drawing widespread criticism for his appointment of Whitaker, Trump also claimed, “I don’t know Matt Whitaker.” Yet a month earlier on Fox & Friends, he’d said, “I can tell you Matt Whitaker’s a great guy. I mean, I know Matt ."


So now there is a fresh question for Trump: Did he know Whitaker was a fervent advocate for prosecuting Clinton, one who even contended she could and should be charged after the election? Did Trump have this in mind when he named Whitaker acting attorney general?

https://www.motherjones.com/politic...inistration-should-prosecute-hillary-clinton/

 

[bestone4ever]

Name calling doesn't shame anyone but yourself bubba.

Being a brain-damaged retard, you not remembering our motorcycle conversation isn't very surprising.

https://media1.tenor.com/images/22d9689453caf1cd8e4da60495038966/tenor.gif?itemid=9467035

 

[KeithD]

So now there is a fresh question for Trump: Did he know Whitaker was a fervent advocate for prosecuting Clinton, one who even contended she could and should be charged after the election? Did Trump have this in mind when he named Whitaker acting attorney general?

It's all just adding wood to the "Throw Trump in the fire" slide into federal prison. If Whitaker is dumb enough to go with him, that's fine with me. It's not like anyone with a brain wouldn't know where it was headed.

 

[OldJourno]

I saw this clip of the press questioning the president on this before Mr. Big departed for Mar A Lago (Translation: You can't afford it). In it, Trump dismissed the hubbub about his daughter's emails on her public email account.
The president also said something strange, mentioning something about Secretary Hillary Clinton's private email server, how she mishandled highly classified material, how all of it was hacked by every major spy agency in the world, how Clinton deleted 33,000 emails that had been deleted, and that Clinton ordered her staff to destroy equipment such as Blackberries.
I keep up with the news by reading the New York Times, so none of what he said can be true, right?
I mean, this is the kind of stuff the NYT would be all over. Right?

 

[doowdniw]

It's all just adding wood to the "Throw Trump in the fire" slide into federal prison. If Whitaker is dumb enough to go with him, that's fine with me. It's not like anyone with a brain wouldn't know where it was headed.

That may actually be the least of Whitaker's legal worries.

 

[KeithD]

That may actually be the least of Whitaker's legal worries.

Fine with me. He fingered himself as an idiot to have gone after the job of bag man for a con man who said "I don't know him" the moment he gave him the title.

 

[doowdniw]

Fine with me. He fingered himself as an idiot to have gone after the job of bag man for a con man who said "I don't know him" the moment he gave him the title.

Birds of a feather.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Being a brain-damaged retard, you not remembering our motorcycle conversation isn't very surprising.

The only person who though that conversation went well for you, was you.

 

[phrodeau]

So did anyone find out if Ivanaka was keeping classified info on her home servers???

Or are (D)'s just ignoring that MAJOR difference just like they pretend there is no difference between legal and illegal immigration?

I am interested in an answer to this question. If storing e-mail on a private server in one's home is a breach of national security, what is it when one's e-mail is stored on a public server, location unknown?

 

[Rightguide]

Matt Whitaker Suggested the Trump Administration Should Prosecute Hillary Clinton

NOVEMBER 20, 2018

McGahn, who recently left the White House, held the line against Trump’s desire to weaponize the Justice Department. But there is someone in Trump’s circle who has long been an advocate of prosecuting Clinton: Matt Whitaker, Trump’s controversial pick to replace Jeff Sessions as acting attorney general.

Trump has insisted he wasn’t aware of Whitaker’s anti-Mueller views before placing him in charge of the Justice Department—though Whitaker had repeatedly voiced that position during cable television appearances. After drawing widespread criticism for his appointment of Whitaker, Trump also claimed, “I don’t know Matt Whitaker.” Yet a month earlier on Fox & Friends, he’d said, “I can tell you Matt Whitaker’s a great guy. I mean, I know Matt ."


So now there is a fresh question for Trump: Did he know Whitaker was a fervent advocate for prosecuting Clinton, one who even contended she could and should be charged after the election? Did Trump have this in mind when he named Whitaker acting attorney general?

https://www.motherjones.com/politic...inistration-should-prosecute-hillary-clinton/

The idea that the President cannot or shouldn't be involved in the DOJ or its prosecutions is left wing ignorance and plain bullshit. The Constitution commands the President to "take care that the laws be faithfully executed," which bears directly on the present reality in the DOJ that laws were not faithfully executed but corrupted under the Obama administration and among Obama holdovers still in the administration after the election.

The President has every right and duty to bring the DOJ under control to the extent of replacing, investigating, prosecuting, employees or officers who violate the Constitution, or any law. I would remind people on the left that Thomas Jefferson actually participated in the prosecution of Aron Burr. Barack Obama involved himself in the cases involving investigations of the IRS, David H. Petraeus, and the Hillary Clinton email investigation.

 

[RobDownSouth]

I am interested in an answer to this question. If storing e-mail on a private server in one's home is a breach of national security, what is it when one's e-mail is stored on a public server, location unknown?

<BackstreetBoy Mode>
That...THAT...THAT'S DIFFERENT!
</BackstreetBoy Mode>

Notice how BackstreetBoy continues to pivot the discussion away from the obvious violation of the law by Ivanka, preferring to instead focus on "classified information". No hack partisanship there, nossir.

The answer to your question is....we'll never know, unless gmail maintains some sort of historical backup of Ivanka's account, which I seriously doubt it does. So using the BackstreetBoy standard of evidence (guilty until proven innocent) we can infer that Ivanka stored and shared copious quantities of classified information in her emails, which she bartered away in a vain attempt to keep her failing fashion business afloat.

 

[Rightguide]

<BackstreetBoy Mode>
That...THAT...THAT'S DIFFERENT!
</BackstreetBoy Mode>

Notice how BackstreetBoy continues to pivot the discussion away from the obvious violation of the law by Ivanka, preferring to instead focus on "classified information". No hack partisanship there, nossir.

The answer to your question is....we'll never know, unless gmail maintains some sort of historical backup of Ivanka's account, which I seriously doubt it does. So using the BackstreetBoy standard of evidence (guilty until proven innocent) we can infer that Ivanka stored and shared copious quantities of classified information in her emails, which she bartered away in a vain attempt to keep her failing fashion business afloat.

Is she an actual federal employee or just an unpaid informal assistant to the President?

 

[RobDownSouth]

Is she an actual federal employee or just an unpaid informal assistant to the President?

She holds the position of Senior Advisor to the President. She chooses to forego a government salary. Her assistant is paid $115,000 per year. Trump has a Top Secret security clearance, which allows her access to highly classified material which she can then sell to Russia and Saudi Arabia, negating the need for a government salary.

But it's okay to share Top Secret military info if you're not getting paid by the federal government, right?

 

[BotanyBoy]

<BackstreetBoy Mode>
That...THAT...THAT'S DIFFERENT!
</BackstreetBoy Mode>

Notice how BackstreetBoy continues to pivot the discussion away from the obvious violation of the law by Ivanka, preferring to instead focus on "classified information".

It is different, you should know that, but you were probably never in a place to have classified info anyhow.


Ever notice how Bigot down south like to ignore key legal elements of discussions???


Like classified emals vs not classified......legal entry into the country vs not......


Yea...we know why Rob.

 

[RobDownSouth]

LOL....BackstreetBoy is still trying to pivot away from inconvenient facts.

We all know why.

 

[Rightguide]

She holds the position of Senior Advisor to the President. She chooses to forego a government salary. Her assistant is paid $115,000 per year. Trump has a Top Secret security clearance, which allows her access to highly classified material which she can then sell to Russia and Saudi Arabia, negating the need for a government salary.

But it's okay to share Top Secret military info if you're not getting paid by the federal government, right?

I have to hand it to you, you live up to your reputation as lit's most despicable human being.