Botany Boy & Rob

Is Rob’s use of racist language okay?


  • Total voters
    35
Ah, as expected, you’re just talking out of your racist ass again, and attempting to make yet another thread all about you.

Attention whores gonna whore.

I'll tell you one last time:
You're stupid, gross and you disgust me.
At least Rob is intelligent, and aware of his own xenophobia.

So take your disgusting fat ass off my lawn.
 
You didn't miss the threads. I'm talking about what is on page 2 of this thread. Here is BotBoy's response to me calling him out for promoting specific weapons he would use to attack a mosque, for advocating that migrants crossing the border into this country be gunned down by military planes, and for telling a polyamorous female that he hoped one of her lovers would beat her to near-death:

"I don't see anything wrong with wanting to defend my nation from hostile invaders or wishing the victims of sexist abusers rise up and give their abusers a taste of their own medicine."​

Who the fuck cares about splitting hairs over his "intentions" in making these violent statements in the first place. Intentions don't mean shit. Advocating violence to enforce your views is wrong, and his statement above indicates that he feels entitled to promote this sort of violence.

His more recent statement in this thread indicates that what his said is perfectly fine because he did not get banned for it. So what? Shit-posters on Lit also don't always get banned for making overtly racist statements. That's Lit's decision if they want to allow posters to promote violent terrorism or a forum for racism, but it does not make it right.
You're actually right. BotanyBoy has no businness saying that outrageous dipshittery, just like Busybody or Rob don't.


I was initially quite biased because:

1. like 85 and butters just demonstrated, there's a culture on the GB of harassing specific minority groups (Asians, Jews or non-English speaking immigrants) over all sorts of pretenses (they're racists against Blacks!).
And when They finally lose their marbles and say stupid things: document it to justify even further harassment.

2. Anyone who's anti-illegals is often labelled as "racist" on the GB.
But it has nothing to do with racism, it's just unfair imo: the more illegals in the States, the fewer chances for those from other parts of the world.

I often wondered if such intense emotions over the Ilegals debate are actually about something else: that part of Southern US used to belong to Mexico?
 
You're actually right. BotanyBoy has no businness saying that outrageous dipshittery, just like Busybody or Rob don't.


I was initially quite biased because:

1. like 85 and butters just demonstrated, there's a culture on the GB of harassing specific minority groups (Asians, Jews or non-English speaking immigrants) over all sorts of pretenses (they're racists against Blacks!).
And when They finally lose their marbles and say stupid things: document it to justify even further harassment.


2. Anyone who's anti-illegals is often labelled as "racist" on the GB.
But it has nothing to do with racism, it's just unfair imo: the more illegals in the States, the fewer chances for those from other parts of the world.

I often wondered if such intense emotions over the Ilegals debate are actually about something else: that part of Southern US used to belong to Mexico?



hashie, someone shining a spotlight your blatant racism and hate-fuelled racist remarks is not harassment, ya big dummy.

The only one losing their marbles is you, with your unsubstantiated bleats of xenophobia and harassment, alt hunting and attention seeking, and all your goofy deflection and denying your obvious racism.
 
Dude.
Your IQ=85 is showing.
Again.

You never stalked Busybody or JamesBJohnson.

You stalked me instead. The scary foreign woman!
 
Dude.
Your IQ=85 is showing.
Again.

You never stalked Busybody or JamesBJohnson.

You stalked me instead. The scary foreign woman!



Replying to your posts is not stalking, racist.

What do your fellow, favourite racists have to do with anything? More deflection?
 
Replying to your posts is not stalking, racist.

What do your fellow, favourite racists have to do with anything? More deflection?

You inserted yourself in this thread, trying to turn it into a "surfer is a racist!"
After I started to see coati's point and tried to call out BotanyBoy on his violent memes.
Your h8tred and low IQ are showing.

Go look after your wife and children, instead of spending your energy on a porn board, playgrounder.
 
You inserted yourself in this thread, trying to turn it into a "surfer is a racist!"
After I started to see coati's point and tried to call out BotanyBoy on his violent memes.
Your h8tred and low IQ are showing.

Go look after your wife and children, instead of spending your energy on a porn board, playgrounder.


Trying? Hahahahahahaha!

I posted your words and the thread where you demonstrated your racism. You know, where you claimed to be ‘joking’.

You’ve posted nothing to back up any of your blather.
You ever going to provide a link, or are you just going to keep bleating your nonsense?
 
In a not-quite-amazing coincidence, "fuck ups happen" were the first words uttered by BotanyBoy's father after seeing his newborn son for the first time....
*nods*

But at least I'm not an anti-American socialist, I'll always be your better in that regard. ;)
 
Bob still hiding in ignominious shame at having his rationale for his odious behavior roundly rejected?
 
Botanydummy.. Here at 330 in the morning.. #Winning

You've never gotten up early?:confused:

Of course not, you're weak sauce like that.

That's why despite having at least a decade on me you're still a wage slave in Detroit.

That's why youz a ChirForce POG instead of AirForce operator :cool:

Getting up early is in fact winning. :cool:

Is he winning a Darwin Award? 🤣🤣🤣

No. I'm feeling good and getting paid. :cool:
 
Last edited:
Botanydummy.. Here at 330 in the morning.. #Winning

His "wife" is presumably working and he's "unemployed and unemployable", so one presumes he gets the responsibility for early morning diaper changes.

There's an odd symmetry here: diaper changing and shitposting.
*nods*
 
I like witty repartee, under which racist/sexist/sex shaming language does not fall. It's easy and low brow, and doesn't look good on anyone.
 
His "wife" is presumably working and he's "unemployed and unemployable", so one presumes he gets the responsibility for early morning diaper changes.

There's an odd symmetry here: diaper changing and shitposting.
*nods*

You know, for a guy who's so uptight about people always wanting to know about your bowel habits, you seem the be the one bringing it up all the time.

Why is that exactly? :confused:
 
You know, for a guy who's so uptight about people always wanting to know about your bowel habits, you seem the be the one bringing it up all the time.

Why is that exactly? :confused:

"people"? Not "people", counselor. "person". Obsession over bowel habits is the purvey of exactly one poster here: Vetteman currently d/b/a RightGuide.

He has hundreds if not thousands of posts here on Lit obsessing over mens' genitals and bodily fluids.

I make one single post about dirty diapers and true to form, you're Johnny-on-the-spot here with an immediate "balance equivalency" logical fallacy. "But Mommmmm...the other guy does it tooooooooo"
 
His "wife" is presumably working

Yep, she's usually up about 430-5 most mornings....because she's a winner too. :D

and he's "unemployed and unemployable"

Where do you come up with this shit Rob?

Why must you lie so blatantly and profusely?

I'm betting it's because you can't formulate any substantive arguments for either your overt racism or your vile anti-American political positions. :D
 
i will: a person can hold entirely non-racist views yet still choose to use racial taunts specifically to attack an individual, understanding it's bait. does it make it right or something condonable? of course not. i'm not speaking about someone reverting to racial epithets in anger, where it's common to retreat mentally to basic beliefs, this is about using it as a tool against an individual for effect even though it doesn't reflect the mentality of the person using it. i'm sure people will argue this, but i can see the difference. do i think it's in any way, shape or form acceptable? of course not.

We can agree to disagree.

He wasn't making a joke and they are not friends.

I think that a person who intends to harm anyone they dislike with racist remarks is indeed a racist. It IS the mentality. It wasn't friendly, it was gross and it seems pretty obvious to me that Rob was having a go.

To say that attacking someone with racist remarks is a tool and has no bearing on their mentality sounds like you're trying to find a loophole to excuse the fact that it is racism. Fail.

My two cents.
 
Back
Top