Big 5 of pyls

Female, submissive

Extroversion - 64%
Orderliness - 55%
Emotional Stability - 55%
Accommodation - 58%
Inquisitiveness - 58%

"Extroversion results were moderately high which suggests you are, at times, overly talkative, outgoing, sociable and interacting at the expense of developing your own individual interests and internally based identity."

I am talkative and outgoing but have a pretty well-developed sense of self.

"Orderliness results were medium which suggests you are moderately organized, structured, and self controlled while still remaining flexible, varied, and fun."

Sure, sounds good to me.

"Emotional Stability results were medium which suggests you are moderately relaxed, calm, secure, and optimistic."

I am not optimistic - I'm realistic but try to deal with whatever happens in a positive way. I expect life to give me lemons, but I am standing by with sweet tea to float them in. I can stress out with the best of them but I try to keep a lid on it.

"Accommodation results were moderately high which suggests you are, at times, overly kind natured, trusting, and helpful at the expense of your own individual development (martyr complex)."

This is another half and half - I am trusting and try to put others first, until they abuse that. I won't make a martyr of myself for just anyone.

"Inquisitiveness results were moderately high which suggests you are intellectual, curious, imaginative but possibly not very practical."

Sad but true. I am not practical in the least.

"Global 5: sloan SCOAI; sloan+ |S|COAI; primary Social; S(64%)C(55%)O(55%)A(58%)I(58%)" - the description of which includes: fearless, self confident, non-hostile, trusting, rarely sad, social, adapts easily to new situations, hard to annoy, calm in crisis, high energy level, thinks before acting, true to self in all circumstances, highly motivated to succeed, decisive, easy to get to know, narcissistic, driven by reason, thinks they are extraordinary.

Pretty accurate. But I am certain I'm extraordinary. ;-)
 
This is mine (husband)

Big Five Test Results

Extroversion |||||| 27%
Orderliness |||||||||||||||||| 75%
Emotional Stability |||||||||||||| 52%
Accommodation |||||||||||||||| 67%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||| 47%
 
1. Female
2. Submissive
3. Big Five Test Results

Extroversion |||||||||| 38%
Orderliness |||||||||||||| 52%
Emotional Stability |||||||||| 32%
Accommodation |||||||||||||||| 67%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||| 35%

Extroversion results were moderately low which suggests you are reclusive, quiet, unassertive, and secretive.
I can be and have to push myself to assert myself, I have difficultly feeling comfortable opening up to people.

Orderliness results were medium which suggests you are moderately organized, structured, and self controlled while still remaining flexible, varied, and fun.
I would say this is accurate.

Emotional Stability results were moderately low which suggests you are worrying, insecure, emotional, and anxious.
Hmm, probaly sort of correct. At this time in my life I have alot going on personally and professionally.

Accommodation results were moderately high which suggests you are, at times, overly kind natured, trusting, and helpful at the expense of your own individual development (martyr complex).
Me in a nutshell.

Inquisitiveness results were moderately low which suggests you are, at times, overly small minded, traditional, and conventional at the expense of intellectual curiousity, possibility, and progress.
I don't agree, I am always looking to find out new information and try new things. But I am very traditional in what I want the world to see.
 
my results made me feel like the biggest loser in the universe :wahhhhahahhah crying in a corner in the fetal
 
Female

Victim?

Extroversion |||||||||||| 50%
Orderliness |||||||||||| 44%
Emotional Stability |||||||||| 38%
Accommodation |||||||||||||| 58%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||||||||| 75%

Extroversion results were medium which suggests you are moderately talkative, outgoing, sociable and interacting.

Orderliness results were moderately low which suggests you are, at times, overly flexible, random, improvised, and fun seeking at the expense of structure, reliability, work ethic, and long term accomplishment.

Emotional Stability results were moderately low which suggests you are worrying, insecure, emotional, and anxious.

Accommodation results were moderately high which suggests you are, at times, overly kind natured, trusting, and helpful at the expense of your own individual development (martyr complex).

Inquisitiveness results were high which suggests you are very intellectual, curious, imaginative but possibly not very practical.


I'd say that's about right.
 
I was looking through the thread and decide to give the test a try. here it is

Male

Extroversion |||| 12%
Orderliness |||||||||||| 41%
Emotional Stability|||||||||||||||||||| 81%
Accommodation |||||||||||| 41%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||| 50%

Extroversion results were very low which suggests you are extremely reclusive, quiet, unassertive, and secretive.
True

Orderliness results were moderately low which suggests you are, at times, overly flexible, random, improvised, and fun seeking at the expense of structure, reliability, work ethic, and long term accomplishment.
True

Emotional Stability results were high which suggests you are very relaxed, calm, secure, and optimistic.
True

Accommodation results were moderately low which suggests you are, at times, overly selfish, uncooperative, and difficult at the expense of the well being of others.
Not Always

Inquisitiveness results were medium which suggests you are moderately intellectual, curious, and imaginative.
True


RCUEI

atheist/agnostic tendencies, unconcerned with public image, lower energy level, does not value tradition, avoidant, does not put the welfare of others above self, not punctual, unproductive, does not believe in human goodness, not easily moved to tears, seldom bothered by the suffering of strangers, insensitive to the needs of others, relaxed, quiet around strangers, tendency to believe only in self, people have trouble reading them but they don't care, late finishing work, acts without planning, withdrawn, rarely too busy, not a perfectionist, uncooperative, not prone to complimenting people, does not believe in life after death, avoids crowds, prefers unpredictable to organized, not passionate about bettering the world's condition, does not second guess self, able to control cravings, calm in crisis, ambivalent to the feelings of others, believes in the importance of art, dislikes small talk, socially uncomfortable, private, not known for generosity, acts without consulting others, hard to get to know, not easily frustrated, interested in intellectual pursuits, not open about feelings, loner, asks many questions, open to change, influenced more by self than others, bored at work



Surprising the description matched me almost too well.
 
Last edited:
Female

..... I wont say I was one way or the other... :) just depends you know

results...

Extroversion |||||||||||||||||| 78%
Orderliness |||||||||||| 50%
Emotional Stability |||||||||||||||| 70%
Accommodation |||||||||||| 47%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||| 41%


Extroversion results were high which suggests you are overly talkative, outgoing, sociable and interacting at the expense too often of developing your own individual interests and internally based identity.
I will admit I am extremely talkative. and I love being around people.

Orderliness results were medium which suggests you are moderately organized, structured, and self controlled while still remaining flexible, varied, and fun.
this one is very true.

Emotional Stability results were high which suggests you are very relaxed, calm, secure, and optimistic.
This one is very ture as well.

Accommodation results were medium which suggests you are moderately kind natured, trusting, and helpful while still maintaining your own interests.
They are on a role! True again.

Inquisitiveness results were moderately low which suggests you are, at times, overly small minded, traditional, and conventional at the expense of intellectual curiousity, possibility, and progress.
This is the only one I have trouble with.... I love learning new things... Hearing others ideas... expanding my knowledge is very important to me.

the test wasnt so bad. With alot of the things I could have gone either way.. I feel that I am very balanced and that each situation calls for a different solution.
 
Female - submissive

Extroversion |||||||||||| 44%
Orderliness |||||| 24%
Emotional Stability |||||||||||||| 52%
Accommodation |||||||||||||||| 64%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||||||| 64%


Extroversion results were moderately low which suggests you are reclusive, quiet, unassertive, and secretive.

Orderliness results were low which suggests you are overly flexible, random, improvised, and fun seeking at the expense too often of structure, reliability, work ethic, and long term accomplishment.

Emotional Stability results were medium which suggests you are moderately relaxed, calm, secure, and optimistic.

Accommodation results were moderately high which suggests you are, at times, overly kind natured, trusting, and helpful at the expense of your own individual development (martyr complex).

Inquisitiveness results were moderately high which suggests you are intellectual, curious, imaginative but possibly not very practical.
 
the data on this is on the old computer. I remember their was something interesting about it, but don't remember what.
 
Interesting...

Took 3 different tests. Short one, then longer one, then the really long one.

Got the same read, all three.

RCOEN / ISTJ(friendly type)

Extroversion |||||| 27%
Orderliness |||||||||||||||| 70%
Emotional Stability |||||||||||||||||| 78%
Accommodation |||| 18%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||| 38%

The robo-pshrink says I'm qualified for a career as a boat anchor.

And I'm cool with that.


I originally came here for the stories and pretty girls.
But it's weird shit like this, that keeps me coming back.
 
the data on this is on the old computer. I remember their was something interesting about it, but don't remember what.

No fair! Now I'm curious what connections were made.


Here's mine.

Female
Bottom


Extroversion |||||||||||| 44%
Orderliness |||||||||||||||| 61%
Emotional Stability |||||||||||||||| 67%
Accommodation |||||||||||||||| 61%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||| 41%

Extroversion results were moderately low which suggests you are reclusive, quiet, unassertive, and secretive.
It depends on what's going on, but that's pretty accurate. I have to be an extrovert in the professional world, but that takes some self-pushing sometimes.

Orderliness results were moderately high which suggests you are, at times, overly organized, neat, structured and restrained at the expense too often of flexibility, variety, spontaneity, and fun.
That's another situational one but pretty accurate. I have lists to keep track of my lists, but that's because I'm a scatterbrain and will forget where I am if I don't keep track.

Emotional Stability results were moderately high which suggests you are relaxed, calm, secure, and optimistic.
I'm capable of being a worrier in the right circumstances, but I usually feel it's a waste of time. I'd rather fix it and move on, and if it's unfixable there's no point worrying over things I can't change.

Accommodation results were moderately high which suggests you are, at times, overly kind natured, trusting, and helpful at the expense of your own individual development (martyr complex).
At the risk of looking "unsubbie," I disagree with this one a little. I have fairly specific expectations of those around me and don't bend for many. I think there's a big difference between politeness and accommodation. The only exception to that rule is for HIM.

Inquisitiveness results were moderately low which suggests you are, at times, overly small minded, traditional, and conventional at the expense of intellectual curiousity, possibility, and progress.
Sadly, fairly accurate. I can get stuck in my ways without a nudge or good reason.
 
Female / female
kick ass submissive

:devil:


Extroversion |||||||||| 38%
Orderliness |||||||||||| 50%
Emotional Stability |||||||||||||| 58%
Accommodation |||||||||||||||| 61%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||||| 55%

The Big Five is currently the most accepted personality model in the scientific community. The Big Five emerged from the work of multiple independent scientists/researchers starting in the 1950s who using different techniques obtained similar results. Those results were that there are five distinct personality traits/dimensions. Here are your results on each dimension:

Extroversion results were moderately low which suggests you are reclusive, quiet, unassertive, and secretive.

Orderliness results were medium which suggests you are moderately organized, structured, and self controlled while still remaining flexible, varied, and fun.

Emotional Stability results were moderately high which suggests you are relaxed, calm, secure, and optimistic.

Accommodation results were moderately high which suggests you are, at times, overly kind natured, trusting, and helpful at the expense of your own individual development (martyr complex).

Inquisitiveness results were medium which suggests you are moderately intellectual, curious, and imaginative.
Your Global5/SLOAN type is RCOAI
Your Primary type is Accommodating
 
No fair! Now I'm curious what connections were made.

If you want to be my data entry slave I can run it again. Though I think doms had error margins a bit big on some categories, so I'd want more cases. And a base for the population would also be really helpful, I'd have to look that up.

However subs showed some surprisingly tight correlations, with a few outliers, whos ID I couldn't help but check and was very surprised. :rolleyes:
 
1. Sex/gender, if they vary

2. State your desired role

3. Give your % results for
Extroversion
Emotional stability
Accommodation

4. State how accurate you believe your results to be, you can see an explanation of your results bellow the table containing percent results.

1. Female/Extra girly

2. Submissive

Extroversion |||||||||||| 50%
Emotional Stability |||||||||||||| 58%
Accommodation |||||||||||||||||| 78%


Pretty accurate.

Extroversion results were medium which suggests you are moderately talkative, outgoing, sociable and interacting. Yes I would say that is true most of the time. Sometimes I feel very hermit-y. If I have a lot of social interaction for a long period (more than a few hours) I tend to want to withdraw for a while.

Emotional Stability results were moderately high which suggests you are relaxed, calm, secure, and optimistic.
Yup, all of those things. Having such a wonderful relationship really goes a long way for this. We have great future potential with lots of opportunities open to us.

Accommodation results were high which suggests you are overly kind natured, trusting, and helpful at the expense too often of your own individual development (martyr complex). For the most part it is true. I don't agree with the martyr complex part. I'm a mother, not a martyr. Heh.
 
If you want to be my data entry slave I can run it again. Though I think doms had error margins a bit big on some categories, so I'd want more cases. And a base for the population would also be really helpful, I'd have to look that up.

However subs showed some surprisingly tight correlations, with a few outliers, whos ID I couldn't help but check and was very surprised. :rolleyes:

My guess would be that Subs/bottoms scored high on the accommodation. :cool:
 
1. Female
2. submissive, pet

Big Five Test Results

Extroversion .... 55%
Orderliness ..... 47%
Emotional Stability .... 61%
Accommodation .,... 58%
Inquisitiveness .... 64%



Extroversion results were medium which suggests you are moderately talkative, outgoing, sociable and interacting.
Yep, except when I want to be left alone

Orderliness results were medium which suggests you are moderately organized, structured, and self controlled while still remaining flexible, varied, and fun.
good old middle of the road me

Emotional Stability results were moderately high which suggests you are relaxed, calm, secure, and optimistic.
might be off here somewhat, though I'd agree with the optimistic

Accommodation results were moderately high which suggests you are, at times, overly kind natured, trusting, and helpful at the expense of your own individual development (martyr complex).
wails... oh how I suffer... wait, I like suffering

Inquisitiveness results were moderately high which suggests you are intellectual, curious, imaginative but possibly not very practical.
ohhh.. what is it and can I have it now?


Your Primary type is Inquisitive
 
results

I am a female switcha little more dom than sub with a taste for S. M.
Extroversion |||||||||||||||||| 75%
Orderliness |||||||||||||||||||| 81%
Emotional Stability |||||||||||||||| 67%
Accommodation |||||||||||| 44%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||||||||| 72%
many of the results were reasonable however the accommodation results were incorrect as were the results determining achievement. I enjoy being accommodating and am an extremely high achiever.
 
Here is a quick and valid psychological assessment of ones basic personality.

It’s an easy test, instruction are included and should take no more then 5 minutes at most so please take it for me.

I want to see if there is any similarity in results that subbies, slaves, etc get.

Should be fun and interesting.

Here is your test

http://similarminds.com/big-5-word-pair.html

When you give your results make sure to include

1. Sex/gender, if they vary



2. State your desired role

3. Give your % results for
Extroversion
Emotional stability
Accommodation

4. State how accurate you believe your results to be, you can see an explanation of your results bellow the table containing percent results.


Ps. Yes I know, thats 3 not 5, but the other 2 are irrelevant, so you don't need to show them if you don't like.

Some results

Still accepting data


ok here are my results:


1. am female
2.Switch

3.Extroversion |||||||||| 35%
Orderliness |||||||||||||| 58%
Emotional Stability |||||||||||| 47%
Accommodation |||||||||||||| 55%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||| 44%

4. I do think I'm a little on the quiet side at least untill i get to know ya. I can assertive when I choose to be serective not all I an open book I dont have any thing to hide or be ashamed of so why should i be sercative.

I have a bad case of CDO you know like OCD but in Alphabetical order( although I sure a H E double hockey sticks cant typo or spell). so yes i'm organized neat, and try to maintain structure in my life but I am open minded and canbe spontanious and know how to fun.

Emotionally I think I am rather calm: why sweat the small stuff in life it comes with up and downs just enjoy whatever comes at you. What doesnt kill you only makes you stronger.

I like to help others and make others happy if the people around you are happy it makes life easier. Doesn't mean I have to or that i will give up the things that make me happy for them.I know what I like and what I want so I dont see why you cant accomadte others while at the same time holding on to the things that make you happy too.


Inquisitiveness results : I think i am very open mined but yes i'm set on tradions there again the OCD.

any way thats just me.

____________________________________________________________

Extroversion results were moderately low which suggests you are reclusive, quiet, unassertive, and secretive.

Orderliness results were moderately high which suggests you are, at times, overly organized, neat, structured and restrained at the expense too often of flexibility, variety, spontaneity, and fun.

Emotional Stability results were medium which suggests you are moderately relaxed, calm, secure, and optimistic.

Accommodation results were medium which suggests you are moderately kind natured, trusting, and helpful while still maintaining your own interests.

Inquisitiveness results were moderately low which suggests you are, at times, overly small minded, traditional, and conventional at the expense of intellectual curiousity, possibility, and progress.
 
If you want to be my data entry slave I can run it again. Though I think doms had error margins a bit big on some categories, so I'd want more cases. And a base for the population would also be really helpful, I'd have to look that up.

However subs showed some surprisingly tight correlations, with a few outliers, whos ID I couldn't help but check and was very surprised. :rolleyes:


I took the liberty of changing the job title since I don't think Mister would appreciate it, but happily tossed the reported numbers in a spreadsheet during lunch as the independent contractor of nothing better to do right now, and came up with the following.

I do not certify a lack of typos, but think this is accurate. Where information was omitted or vague, you have blanks. Some folks also typed paragraphs to describe their roles, so I summarized as best I could but you may need to go back and rename if the data is thrown way off. I also omitted posted results that did not include numerical percentages. It's unsorted, entered by order of posting.

There was some interesting info in posts 84 and 117, but on the connections with the subs, I wonder how tendencies towards masochism versus straight submissive would jumble the numbers? Just a thought that may or may not pan out. Also, what about type of sub - service, brat/SAM, whatever - would that connect the dots?

If this doesn't cut/copy into something usable, I can GoogleDoc transfer if needed.


NAME GENDER ROLE EXTROVERSION ORDERLINESS EMOTIONAL STABILITY ACCOMMODATION INQUISITIVENESS
BiBunny F Pet 27 24 35 75 moderately high
nh23 F slave 27 67 35 64 50
BiaTcHiNFiRe F slave 7 24 7 92 41
ataxia.girl F small person 47 47 24 35 67
MajorMalfunction M Owner 21 55 30 30 35
rida F sub/toy 64 38 58 72 47
Adakgirl F submissive 78 38 32 58 30
Adakgirl M submissive 84 41 41 58 52
Cattypuss F bottom 32 61 41 52 52
rinka F sub 64 30 72 64 64
wicked woman F submissive 38 52 64 55 41
ownedsubgal F sub/slave 18 15 78
eastern sun F slave 72 58 47
ChainedEros M Dominant 35 90 81 24 47
graceanne F submissive 64 50 58 67 30
Netzach F Top 50 55 55 30 72
bakedbeams F sub 75 38 30 78 58
Lady Fiona F sub/brat 30 67 55 55 55
DVS M Top 61 52 67 52 47
Harmony 1985 F submissive 72 61 35 72 32
00Syd F sub/pet 61 41 27 44 44
isseii F unknown 27 24 15 58 55
chelleb F sub 32 55 72 41 44
Noira F switch 55 35 75
Marquis M Dominant 84 67 24 18 70
Keroin F pyl 84 81 87 50 58
neci please me F submissive 44 52 72 52 50
HisSexyPet F slave/pet 38 35 52 84 55
Rawhumor M Dominant 41 67 67 47 50
JtohisPB F curious/sub 75 35 41 61 58
subish2009 F submissive 52 38 30 67 50
romantic always F sub 61 55 30 70 55
tkvh4u2 F sumissive 30 50 78 72 58
bridgeburner F bottom 72 61 78 67 64
Esclava F switch 55 30 47 58 78
YourCaptor M Top 41 50 78 27 70
Lizzie Borden F bottom 30 24 18 61 15
MisterSir M PYL 10 50 24 35 58
BlitzKrieger M Master 21 18 55 21 90
nanette09 F unknown 30 27 7 50 41
kaitykins22 F sub 61 47 70
AriannaKing F submissive 38 55 47 41 41
sadangel F sub/slave tendencies 18 55 38 55 47
Bandit58 F sub 18 52 41 72 44
yourmissl 55 18 32 58 87
Ravenwind F slave 32 24 50 84 44
jenniferbaby F sub 15 52 44 78 35
DirtyBear M switch 70 58 58 50 47
zgeist M unknown 47 30 38 70 81
AbiNormal F switch 47 30 61 30 52
StrayKat F switch/Dominant 15 64 47 27 50
theravenfox F switch/Dominant 47 24 27 27 64
morninggirl5 F submissive 58 52 50 35 70
LifelongCyn F submissive 30 75 32 58 27
T Rex M Dominant 44 52 72 47 64
Daddyslilpet F submissive 30 52 32 67 50
Aquila1 F switch 50 50 72 35 78
misslil F sub/slave 38 81 35 78 52
petitefille F bottom 67 21 70
sb2009 F submissive 44 21 78
camaria F switch/sub 24 61 50 44 47
aniven F bottom 18 55 61 61 32
sexthischick F submissive 58 35 61 70 55
trailrunner F submissive 64 55 55 58 58
CoupleFromOhio M 27 75 52 67 47
celticsunspiral F submissive 38 52 32 67 35
shamegirl F victim 50 44 38 58 75
SunTsuStudent M 12 41 81 41 50
wynnie F unknown/switch 78 50 70 47 41
corks25 F submissive 44 24 52 64 64
MisterGone M 27 70 78 18 38
VelvetSin F submissive 44 61 67 61 41
FurryFury F submissive 38 50 58 61 55
CynMarie F submissive 50 58 78
JadedOne F sub/pet 55 47 61 58 64
switchbitch F switch/Dominant 75 81 67 44 72
Kirabeth F switch 35 58 47 55 44
 
Last edited:
I took the liberty of changing the job title since I don't think Mister would appreciate it, but happily tossed the reported numbers in a spreadsheet during lunch as the independent contractor of nothing better to do right now, and came up with the following.

I do not certify a lack of typos, but think this is accurate. Where information was omitted or vague, you have blanks. Some folks also typed paragraphs to describe their roles, so I summarized as best I could but you may need to go back and rename if the data is thrown way off. I also omitted posted results that did not include numerical percentages. It's unsorted, entered by order of posting.

There was some interesting info in posts 84 and 117, but on the connections with the subs, I wonder how tendencies towards masochism versus straight submissive would jumble the numbers? Just a thought that may or may not pan out. Also, what about type of sub - service, brat/SAM, whatever - would that connect the dots?

If this doesn't cut/copy into something usable, I can GoogleDoc transfer if needed.


8<

:eek:

Damn, just when I'm counting on the fact that all chicks are lazy and flaky, life spits irony in my face once again.

Ok, google docs I have no experience with, can it export spreadsheets? I’ll try it, give it here.

I think I tried the brats thing, if I remember right, some correlation resulted in quadrants which would indicate predictability of brats and slaves based on numbers. However in the real world that totally useless, cause how hard is it to tell apart a brat from a slave. :rolleyes:



So if we are going to do this, here's what it would mean.

Personality is defined as a set of stable characteristics that influence behavior. The big 5 is a rather successful attempt at breaking down personality into its common denominators.

So what we are doing is choosing some behaviors, dom, sub, etc, and seeing if they form a pattern with measurable personality components or combination of them.
 
:eek:

Damn, just when I'm counting on the fact that all chicks are lazy and flaky, life spits irony in my face once again.

Ok, google docs I have no experience with, can it export spreadsheets? I’ll try it, give it here.

I think I tried the brats thing, if I remember right, some correlation resulted in quadrants which would indicate predictability of brats and slaves based on numbers. However in the real world that totally useless, cause how hard is it to tell apart a brat from a slave. :rolleyes:



So if we are going to do this, here's what it would mean.

Personality is defined as a set of stable characteristics that influence behavior. The big 5 is a rather successful attempt at breaking down personality into its common denominators.

So what we are doing is choosing some behaviors, dom, sub, etc, and seeing if they form a pattern with measurable personality components or combination of them.

If it helps keep irony from shredding your reality, I'm generally lazy and flaky. :rolleyes::D

GoogleDocs can be downloaded into whatever spreadsheet format you prefer. Please check PMs for the link.
 
Mine :)

Female - submissive

Extroversion |||||||||| 35%
Orderliness |||||||||||| 50%
Emotional Stability |||||| 30%
Accommodation |||||||||||||||||||| 81%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||||||||||| 84%

Extroversion results were moderately low which suggests you are reclusive, quiet, unassertive, and secretive. - erm perhaps a little, especially with new people. However in my work role I have to be asserive and a little outspoken.

Orderliness results were medium which suggests you are moderately organized, structured, and self controlled while still remaining flexible, varied, and fun. -this is fairly accurate

Emotional Stability results were low which suggests you are very worrying, insecure, emotional, and anxious. -again, accurate - however not overly so. I would not use the word "very"

Accommodation results were high which suggests you are overly kind natured, trusting, and helpful at the expense too often of your own individual development (martyr complex). this is accurate. I tend to put others before myself, but I'm not overly trusting by any stretch!

Inquisitiveness results were very high which suggests you are extremely intellectual, curious, imaginative but possibly not very practical. agree completely. the practicality thing is hit/miss with me :) lol

Your Global5/SLOAN type is RLUAI
Your Primary type is Inquisitive
 
I've been playing with the data and here's all I got.

attachment.php


Those are the means, I ran an ANOVA, and only accommodation between doms and subs shows a significant difference, or in other words, shows the only activity that statistically is not due to randomness.

That's all their is, I ran a bunch of other stuff but nothing. No interactions between personality elements. In fact, subs are total flatliners it seems, absolutely no activity.

Most shockingly I find that switches are disturbingly normal. They have basically no personality at all. Look at the chart, almost perfect neutral scores at 50.

Mostly this is probably a failure due to a lack of power. First theirs the whole self identification thing, some kind of stricter criteria for dom, subs, switch, etc is needed. I basically have no dependent variables here. A controlled testing environment helps too.

It's still cool though that it worked at all.

So from wiki on accommodation aka agreeableness

Agreeableness is a tendency to be compassionate and cooperative rather than suspicious and antagonistic towards others. The trait reflects individual differences in general concern for social harmony. Agreeable individuals value getting along with others. They are generally considerate, friendly, generous, helpful, and willing to compromise their interests with others. Agreeable people also have an optimistic view of human nature. They believe people are basically honest, decent, and trustworthy.

Disagreeable individuals place self-interest above getting along with others. They are generally unconcerned with others’ well-being, and are less likely to extend themselves for other people. Sometimes their skepticism about others’ motives causes them to be suspicious, unfriendly, and uncooperative.

And a special thanks to velvetsin for typing up everything.
 
Back
Top