julybaby04
...always dreaming....
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2008
- Posts
- 19,442
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He is a liberal.....![]()
Julybaby04, arguing with you is like trying to nail jello to a tree.
Let's look at the facts here.
First, let's plug in the most recent family statistics you've provided:
http://i1239.photobucket.com/albums/ff502/Soonyigump/jbabby01_zpse9a8e5f9.jpg
As you can see, if you are truly "unable to qualify for a subsidy", then you and your current husband are making a combined income of more than $126,400
to exceed the subsidy threshold.
Here is your expected contribution for a SILVER plan:
http://i1239.photobucket.com/albums/ff502/Soonyigump/jbabby02_zpsb88b48ef.jpg
As you can see, you are expected to pay 11% of your income per year to insure your large family.
11% of an income of over $125,000.
$14,000 per year to insure you, your fifty-something spouse, and your brood of children.
Are you claiming this is too much of a hardship?
There are bronze plans available that knock the cost down to $11,000 per year. Is THAT too much of a hardship?
I find myself having very little sympathy for you if you are unable or unwilling to budget that much money to insure the health of you and your family at that income level.
I don't buy that.
Hey new troll.
These 11 States Now Have More People On Welfare Than Are Employed, NINE of them have majority Democrat party affiliation.(PA).”Death Spiral,” proclaims a chain mail that an Austin reader brought to our attention Dec. 21, 2012.
That’s the headline on a U.S. map with 11 states highlighted and accompanying text that says, “These 11 states now have more people on welfare than they do employed.”
We found the same message and map posted on blogs, discussion groups and Facebook. Even Texas’ attorney general tweeted about it Jan. 7.
2013-01-14 08:35:49
Julybaby04, arguing with you is like trying to nail jello to a tree.
Let's look at the facts here.
First, let's plug in the most recent family statistics you've provided:
http://i1239.photobucket.com/albums/ff502/Soonyigump/jbabby01_zpse9a8e5f9.jpg
As you can see, if you are truly "unable to qualify for a subsidy", then you and your current husband are making a combined income of more than $126,400
to exceed the subsidy threshold.
Here is your expected contribution for a SILVER plan:
http://i1239.photobucket.com/albums/ff502/Soonyigump/jbabby02_zpsb88b48ef.jpg
As you can see, you are expected to pay 11% of your income per year to insure your large family.
11% of an income of over $125,000.
$14,000 per year to insure you, your fifty-something spouse, and your brood of children.
Are you claiming this is too much of a hardship?
There are bronze plans available that knock the cost down to $11,000 per year. Is THAT too much of a hardship?
I find myself having very little sympathy for you if you are unable or unwilling to budget that much money to insure the health of you and your family at that income level.
You can't use logic and numbers! That's completely unfair forcing reality on them.
They are from SW Georgia which is basically UCLA.
Ugly Corner of Lower Alabama.![]()
I'm beginning to think she's LDS. That might explain why she "can't" get a subsidy.
Julybaby04, arguing with you is like trying to nail jello to a tree.
Let's look at the facts here.
First, let's plug in the most recent family statistics you've provided:
http://i1239.photobucket.com/albums/ff502/Soonyigump/jbabby01_zpse9a8e5f9.jpg
As you can see, if you are truly "unable to qualify for a subsidy", then you and your current husband are making a combined income of more than $126,400
to exceed the subsidy threshold.
Here is your expected contribution for a SILVER plan:
http://i1239.photobucket.com/albums/ff502/Soonyigump/jbabby02_zpsb88b48ef.jpg
As you can see, you are expected to pay 11% of your income per year to insure your large family.
11% of an income of over $125,000.
$14,000 per year to insure you, your fifty-something spouse, and your brood of children.
Are you claiming this is too much of a hardship?
There are bronze plans available that knock the cost down to $11,000 per year. Is THAT too much of a hardship?
I find myself having very little sympathy for you if you are unable or unwilling to budget that much money to insure the health of you and your family at that income level.
This from a PEDOPHILE from who knows where.. Too scared to say? Thought so... Put on your BIG GIRL panties and grow up, little freak.......
I'm beginning to think she's LDS. That might explain why she "can't" get a subsidy.
I was not specifically speaking of me. I know you have very little sympathy for anyone unwilling to lose everything for the sake of funding someone's healthcare. There are MANY who will not able to afford it. Simple as that.
(And as far as me, I have said before....for THIS FIRST YEAR.....I will not be able to get a subsidy. I do not have the income you stated above but I had an issue come about which will exclude me from the subsidy. Things are not always as you wish them to be.....everyone is different......things happen to EVERYONE that are not on some freaking chart.....)
So, you hate Mormons? Wow!
Why not? I've seen it happen. When I was with the Church of Scientology the hatred of the outside world and the government and all the corruption resulted in some insular and defensive people who thought just like that. The Church of Scientology has no policy of going on government assistance and distancing themselves as much as possible, but check the statistics on Mormons on public assistance.
And you don't buy a stated social policy enacted by lots of people because...religious and radicalized people are...reasonable?