Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Rubyfruit said:When I'm on a roll, I can read two novels a week. My current book is The Red Tent, by Anita Diamant.
Although, I do enjoy reading stories online, nothing will replace the feel of a book in my hands.
Ruby
Something digital will replace books, not tomorrow, maybe not even this decade, but eventually most books will be optionally available in a digital form, then only available in ditigtal form.cymbidia said:I read a lot and *always* have a book going.
You question?
Nothing digital can possibly replace the sensual pleasure of holding a book, of turning the pages, of inhaling that oh-so-delicate book smell - you know the one i mean. Nothing digital can replace the unmitigated luxury of cruising bookstore shelves, kjust wandering, waiting for the right book to find you, your eyes caressing a wildly chaotic panorama of titles in all the colors of the rainbow. Nothing digital can possibly replace the heady sensation of being so drawn into a book that time stands still - and when you look up, it's four hours later and your house is cold and the dog REALLY needs to go out - but you've spent time in another world and are foggy-headed, still halfway an inhabitant of the book-place, and definitely enriched for the experience of having resided there for that bit of time.
I gotta have books.
Marxist said:Hey guys, all that's great but if books are so wonderful, why do they take a backseat in our pop culture. When was the last time you saw a kid or adult with the latest author or book title on a t-shirt? Outside of a bookstore, when was the last time you saw an ad, like movies, for a novel?-------that was my devils' advocate voice.
Marxist said:Hey guys, all that's great but if books are so wonderful, why do they take a backseat in our pop culture. When was the last time you saw a kid or adult with the latest author or book title on a t-shirt? Outside of a bookstore, when was the last time you saw an ad, like movies, for a novel?-------that was my devils' advocate voice.
Rubyfruit said:Marxist,
I really don't know why more people don't read. My mother read constantly when I was a kid, and my brother and I both took it up voraciously as teenagers and haven't stopped since. I don't remember her talking to us about the joys of reading, however she did take us to the library with her every week.
Marxist said:
Ruby, please change your av. I can't read a fucking word that you write.![]()
Yes, but that is going to change. It was changing at the company I worked at; most memos, documentation, etc. were not on paper anymore, but rather shared electronically.Marxist said:Hey STG, we use more paper than ever because of the digital age don't we?
Cost will be much less than a CRT, probably less than $100 for an electronic book that you carry with you everywhere, and then the actual books that you download or buy to load on the book will probably cost less than half what a paper books costs - much of the cost of a paper book is the paper and binding.What about cost? What about convenience? What about transportability?
Marxist said:Consider the last book you read (completely and no Literotica doesn't count). Now think about the last movie (DVD, theatre, HBO, etc...). Which did you enjoy more? And why?
bluespoke said:Nothing changes. Pre cyber age you never saw t-shirts with book titles nor did you see books advertised in the brash way that films are/were.
They won't disappear, but they will change form.Pokerman said:I dont think books will ever disappear.
The equipment will be so inexpensive and so durable that it will be cheaper in the long run than books are now. I have quite a number of books that cost me more than $100 that I wouldn't just hand off to a kid, but I would hand a kid an inexpensive and durable e-book.Can you imagine sitting a child on your lap and reading to them from a computer? My son likes to hold the books while i read to him, i doubt i'd let him hold a piece of valuable electronic equipment.
Electronic ink needs very little power, and batteries would last for days of continuous use. Most of the power for a portable computer currently goes to the display. E-ink only needs power when it changes, not all the time like an LCD or CRT.Books need no batteries, no lights (except enough visible light to read) and no electricity.
They did for me; I never listen to the radio anymore; I have quite a few digital CD quality music channels coming to me via satellite, or I listen to CDs, or I evnetually will get my music on demand from the web. As for nespapers; almost all of them are available to me on the web, for free. The only one I read on paper is the WSJ, and that is because it is usually free at work.TV and Movies did not kill radio. Computers did not kill Newspapers.
Give it time - there are some really cool things coming down the pike. It will still be printed on "paper" but the word will change with the press of a button.No...I don't think we'll ever truly replace the printed word.
Marxist said:
Books as cult collectives are a pretty new idea. "Uncle Tom's Cabin" changed the way world looked at slavery and was promoted as such. The novel was considered the pre-eminent story telling form up until the 1960's. Almost all serious movies had / have their origins in books. Trash novels and real writers like Capote or Jaqueline Susan came on talk shows and the cover of magazines. What changed? Would Leno bring Pynchon or Toni Morrison on his show (provided Thomas would show)? Would anyone know who they are or care?
Marxist said:When was the last time you saw a kid or adult with the latest author or book title on a t-shirt? Outside of a bookstore, when was the last time you saw an ad, like movies, for a novel?[/i]