intothewoods
Truth seeker
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2007
- Posts
- 10,966
In Defense of Food spends a lot of time talking about how we've gotten so concerned with the nutritional value of XYZ, and so skittish about "bad" things instead of the big picture, that despite all the low fat/bad carbs/blahblahblah we're actually eating a worse "healthy" diet than we did at the turn of the century. We've screwed with nutritional balance in the name of science, and our bodies can't cope - which is why we're eating "healthier", but obesity, cancer, heart disease, diabetes, etc are through the roof.
(Oh, BTW - sipping a white merlot the roomie handed me)
White merlot? What is that? I hear ya on the worse health diet. What's with organic oreos ya know?
Oh, Sir_Winston...you should read Omnivore's Dilemma. It is really rather enlightening. And it may make you think twice about which beef you buy to grind yourself. Really, I'm not so sure its the fat you have to worry about as much as the sugar. OK, really, there's a balance.
But corn-fed beef is such an f***ing marketing ploy. Cows are not meant to naturally look for corn. Read the book if you can.
~LB
Balance is good. I'm going for less meat overall these days, and I try to avoid processed foods and the sugars that come with them religiously.


