Another Unqualified Judge Orders Trump Off The Ballot In Illinois

[Rightguide]

Radical Illinois Judge Kicks President Trump Off the State’s Ballot​

By Cullen Linebarger Feb. 28, 2024 7:00 pm

Credit: Illinois State Bar Association

A corrupt Cook County judge has ordered the Illinois Board of Elections to remove Donald Trump from ballots statewide for the March 19 primary.

As ABC 7 News Chicago reports, Democrat Judge Tracie Porter stripped Trump from the Illinois ballot one month after the Illinois State Board of Elections dismissed the anti-Trump challenge in a unanimous and bipartisan vote.

Porter claimed Trump violated the 14th Amendment’s Insurrection Clause as her excuse for removing him from the ballot. We all know Trump did not commit insurrection or any other federal crime.

“The court also realizes the magnitude of this decision and its impact on the upcoming primary Illinois elections,” Porter wrote.

More here:https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...-illinois-judge-kicks-president-trump-states/

Her lack of constitutional knowledge and the fact that the SCOTUS is already reviewing the issue with a decision likely this week showcases her lack of legal acumen.

 

[Bray123]

More erudite legal opinion from TheGatewayIdiot.

 

[stxjimmy]

We all know Trump did not commit insurrection or any other federal crime.​

More here:https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/02/breaking-radical-illinois-judge-kicks-president-trump-states

Speak for yourself, there is no we all.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

"State's rights!"

 

[ll74]

What are the qualifications for being a judge?

 

[Rightguide]

Speak for yourself, there is no we all.

"We all know Trump did not commit insurrection or any other federal crime."​

Although true, where in the article did that quote come from?

 

[Rightguide]

What are the qualifications for being a judge?

To know the law they rule on.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

To know the law they rule on.

So you're saying you know the law better than she does?

and you're here and she's where she is?

hoooo boy you are on one today, motherfucker! pass that bottle of whatever it is you're drinking and share it!

 

[ll74]

To know the law they rule on.

So she's qualified.

Thanks for confirming.

 

[Bn2f]

Radical Illinois Judge Kicks President Trump Off the State’s Ballot​

By Cullen Linebarger Feb. 28, 2024 7:00 pm

Credit: Illinois State Bar Association

A corrupt Cook County judge has ordered the Illinois Board of Elections to remove Donald Trump from ballots statewide for the March 19 primary.

As ABC 7 News Chicago reports, Democrat Judge Tracie Porter stripped Trump from the Illinois ballot one month after the Illinois State Board of Elections dismissed the anti-Trump challenge in a unanimous and bipartisan vote.

Porter claimed Trump violated the 14th Amendment’s Insurrection Clause as her excuse for removing him from the ballot. We all know Trump did not commit insurrection or any other federal crime.


More here:https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...-illinois-judge-kicks-president-trump-states/

Her lack of constitutional knowledge and the fact that the SCOTUS is already reviewing the issue with a decision likely this week showcases her lack of legal acumen.

Now why would the GP post a picture of this particular judge? Hmmmmm

 

[IrezumiKiss]

Now why would the GP post a picture of this particular judge? Hmmmmm

 

[Rightguide]

So she's qualified.

Thanks for confirming.

It's obvious she doesn't know the law, in this case the 14th Amendment. She's never read Section 5 of the 14th and she definitely hasn't read or understood Section 3.

 

[ll74]

It's obvious she doesn't know the law, in this case the 14th Amendment. She's never read Section 5 of the 14th and she definitely hasn't read or understood Section 3.

And yet the ruling refers to specific parts of it.
Odd.

If only there was a title that gave her interpretation more credibility than yours.

 

[stxjimmy]

"We all know Trump did not commit insurrection or any other federal crime."​

Although true, where in the article did that quote come from?

It came from your post, d’oh.
Don’t you read ‘em?

 

[ll74]

"We all know....."

If that's the start of the sentence, you know they have no evidence to support whatever comes next.

 

[Rightguide]

It came from your post, d’oh.
Don’t you read ‘em?

You should probably learn how to post and quote for clarity. It's obvious you have a befuddled thought process.

 

[DeluxAuto]

So you're saying you know the law better than she does?

and you're here and she's where she is?

hoooo boy you are on one today, motherfucker! pass that bottle of whatever it is you're drinking and share it!

Oh my.

Reichguide is qualified to judge a judge but the judge isn't qualified to be a judge?

 

[DeluxAuto]

You should probably learn how to post and quote for clarity. It's obvious you have a befuddled thought process.

Have you ever looked back at your thread titles and the blatant grammatical and punctuation errors you consistently vomit?

 

[stxjimmy]

You should probably learn how to post and quote for clarity. It's obvious you have a befuddled thought process.

It’s perfectly clear whose post I quoted.

 

[DeluxAuto]

Now why would the GP post a picture of this particular judge? Hmmmmm

Imagine all the times per day he mutters "nigger" or "wetback" from behind the safety of his CRT monitor.

 

[Rightguide]

And yet the ruling refers to specific parts of it.
Odd.

If only there was a title that gave her interpretation more credibility than yours.

She fails to understand the 14th Amendment gives no enforcement authority to the states whatsoever. It was written to remove power from the states. She cannot use it as a pretext to remove a Presidential candidate from a state ballot. She has no authority to rule a man guilty of a crime that isn't before her court and who has never been charged let alone convicted of insurrection by any other court. It's obvious she's a politically oriented judge unfamiliar with the law

 

[Rightguide]

It’s perfectly clear whose post I quoted.

It's even more clear you don't know what you're talking about.

 

[ll74]

She fails to understand the 14th Amendment gives no enforcement authority to the states whatsoever. It was written to remove power from the states. She cannot use it as a pretext to remove a Presidential candidate from a state ballot. She has no authority to rule a man guilty of a crime that isn't before her court and who has never been charged let alone convicted of insurrection by any other court. It's obvious she's a politically oriented judge unfamiliar with the law

She understands it just fine and ruled accordingly. That's what judges do ... They hear arguments and rule accordingly.

She does have authority to rule however she sees fit because that's her job.

Whether you agree or not os irrelevant to the validity of the ruling.

 

[stxjimmy]

It's obvious she doesn't know the law, in this case the 14th Amendment. She's never read Section 5 of the 14th and she definitely hasn't read or understood Section 3.

Have you had a consultation with hisarpy? Are you a lawyer too? How do you know what the judge has or hasn’t read?

 

[Rightguide]

She understands it just fine and ruled accordingly. That's what judges do ... They hear arguments and rule accordingly.

She does have authority to rule however she sees fit because that's her job.

Whether you agree or not os irrelevant to the validity of the ruling.

The above is 100% ignorant bullshit. The decision by the SCOTUS expected this week will prove me right.