Another little question.

Sean

We'll see.
Joined
Feb 17, 2005
Posts
96,194
You were all so helpful last time.
I've been told it's all about giving up. You are in control. So, why aren't you doms?
 
SeanH said:
You were all so helpful last time.
I've been told it's all about giving up. You are in control. So, why aren't you doms?

WHAT is all about giving up?

I'm supposed to be in control of what?

I _am_ a dominant.

Sorry Sean, I don't do well with incomplete thoughts. Please re-translate your ideas/questions into whole ideas.

YIK,
- Geoff
 
It's because the D/s power exchange is an inversely proportionate two way symbiosis that channels constantly back and forth and is of such complexity, and yet simplicity, that who gives/gets the power is an endless enigma and can be stated in a multiplicity of ways.

Fury :rose:
 
FurryFury said:
It's because the D/s power exchange is an inversely proportionate two way symbiosis that channels constantly back and forth and is of such complexity, and yet simplicity, that who gives/gets the power is an endless enigma and can be stated in a multiplicity of ways.

Fury :rose:

Thanks for such a clear explanation FF

I had always wondered about that symbio thingy

:D
 
shy slave said:
Thanks for such a clear explanation FF

I had always wondered about that symbio thingy

:D

*giggles*

Clear explanations is what I'm ALL about when such a clear question is asked! *smirks*

Glad to have been of help! *bows*

Fury :rose:
 
FurryFury said:
It's because the D/s power exchange is an inversely proportionate two way symbiosis that channels constantly back and forth and is of such complexity, and yet simplicity, that who gives/gets the power is an endless enigma and can be stated in a multiplicity of ways.

Fury :rose:
*said in a thick German accent*

Und vhen vee haff der zymbiotic relationship, vee haff der makings huff zee hexchange. Der zubmissiff must haff der power to zubmit to der Dominunt und der Dominunt must hagzept der power. Und vonce der Dominunt hagzepts der power, der Dominunt muzt hagzept der responzibiliteinschaft huff meeting der neets huff der zubmissiff. Zis hiss vhy vee call zis der power hexchange...
 
FurryFury said:
It's because the D/s power exchange is an inversely proportionate two way symbiosis that channels constantly back and forth and is of such complexity, and yet simplicity, that who gives/gets the power is an endless enigma and can be stated in a multiplicity of ways.

Fury :rose:


That was the mind-blower for the evening. No one could have said it better.

- Mac
 
Evil_Geoff said:
*said in a thick German accent*

Und vhen vee haff der zymbiotic relationship, vee haff der makings huff zee hexchange. Der zubmissiff must haff der power to zubmit to der Dominunt und der Dominunt must hagzept der power. Und vonce der Dominunt hagzepts der power, der Dominunt muzt hagzept der responzibiliteinschaft huff meeting der neets huff der zubmissiff. Zis hiss vhy vee call zis der power hexchange...

LOL!

I LOVE it and YOU! :kiss:

Fury :rose:

david_mac0021 said:
That was the mind-blower for the evening. No one could have said it better.

- Mac

LOL!

I was just messin' around but I'm glad you liked it Sugah!

Fury :rose:
 
Evil_Geoff said:
*said in a thick German accent*

Und vhen vee haff der zymbiotic relationship, vee haff der makings huff zee hexchange. Der zubmissiff must haff der power to zubmit to der Dominunt und der Dominunt must hagzept der power. Und vonce der Dominunt hagzepts der power, der Dominunt muzt hagzept der responzibiliteinschaft huff meeting der neets huff der zubmissiff. Zis hiss vhy vee call zis der power hexchange...
How long did it take you to do that?
(It was kinda cool though :) )
 
替えとは刺繍をほどこした紅いのんやら白いのん、一枚がうん十万もする舞妓ちゃんの派手な衿から真っ白の芸妓はんの衿に替えることどす。そう、舞妓ちゃんから芸妓はんになる儀式を云うのんどす。
衿替えの一週間前位から、舞妓ちゃんは黒紋付に三本襟足の正装 で、髪は先笄(さっこう)という江戸時代に若妻がしたていう髪形に結うて、お歯黒をさすのんどす。これは昔の舞・芸妓はんは 今みたいに自由に結婚とかでけしまへんどしたさかい、かわいそ やちゅうていっぺんは若妻の恰好さしてあげたんやそうどす。
この恰好でお座敷を廻り、祝い事の時に舞われる「黒髪」ちゅう 舞を舞うのんどす。少女から大人へと変わるひととき、その艶やかさに観る者は思わずぞくっとさせられます。 :rose: :catroar: :rose:
 
SeanH said:
You were all so helpful last time.
I've been told it's all about giving up. You are in control. So, why aren't you doms?
I think what you're getting at is...why would a woman who's in control of her life, successful and confident want to give up that power to another in her sex life?

Well, there are many women who are this way. And, many men, too. The mental stress of such a life in control is overwhelming for a lot of people. And, even though they might enjoy this type of thing in their day to day life, when it's time to be at home and relax with their SO, they want to stop being in control, stop being the boss, stop barking out orders and making decisions...

Now, they want to let someone else take charge...be the boss, bark out orders and make all of the decisions for them. In fact, they just want to be the toy for someone's sexual contol. It's just part of an intricate power exchange that many people go through...and one side balances out the other making theirs a well balanced life.

She's a powerful boss by day, and a submissive servicing her Dom's every whim by night. And, coming from a Dom...I LIKE it! :nana:
 
Last edited:
O'Mac said:
The answer is "Plankton".

Am I wrong?

Yes.

The correct answer is "42". You just misinterpreted the Question.




Okay, seriously now? I really don't get the original question. Why aren't who all doms? And what in the world would the world be like if we were all doms?

Didn't someone actually ask that question in another thread? Or was it the other way, envisioning a world full of subs?
"Spank me!"
"No, you spank me!"

And around and around and around we go....
 
jadefirefly said:
<snip> Or was it the other way, envisioning a world full of subs?
"Spank me!"
"No, you spank me!"

And around and around and around we go....

Hey! That's my world! Only it's more like:

"Spank me?"

Sometime later with an ass all red and stingy.

"Spank me ?

Sometime later with another ass red and stingy it changes again.

It's not a bad deal all in all.

*winks*

Fury :rose:
 
Maybe I can try my hand at mind reading too?

... and so I will insert a few words that I read between the lines here...

SeanH said:
You submissives were all so helpful last time.
I've been told submission is (it's) all about giving up. But after all it is you who decide whether you give yourselves to someon and to what degree and in which limits, so You the submissive are in control. So, if you submissives have all this power and control why aren't you calling yourselves doms?

I think the answer lies in the way you interprete the words control and power.
Of course the submissive remains in control of whether or not he/she wants this kind of relation and to what extend, but once that is established there is a shift of power and control inside that defined relation - I can't find a better word than "active / passive" power and control (and that is not meant in a physically active/passive sense).

It is those different types of "power" that appeal to either the sub or dom side, and it is more the difference of type of power/control that the absolute lack or posession thereof.

That all said, I guess my answer is as cryptic as the question :eek:
Hecate
 
He's a shit disturber from the GB.
I can't help preventing people from doing this shit, it's the teacher in me.
 
brioche said:
He's a shit disturber from the GB.
I can't help preventing people from doing this shit, it's the teacher in me.

He is from the GB,

Last weekend (in real life) he saved two submissives asses when we needed instant help.

Not everyone is trouble just because they post on the GB.

I mean, dolf posts there....

Oh Fuck, I just blew my own arguement

Damn Damn Damn
 
Hecate said:
Maybe I can try my hand at mind reading too?

... and so I will insert a few words that I read between the lines here...



I think the answer lies in the way you interprete the words control and power.
Of course the submissive remains in control of whether or not he/she wants this kind of relation and to what extend, but once that is established there is a shift of power and control inside that defined relation - I can't find a better word than "active / passive" power and control (and that is not meant in a physically active/passive sense).

It is those different types of "power" that appeal to either the sub or dom side, and it is more the difference of type of power/control that the absolute lack or posession thereof.

That all said, I guess my answer is as cryptic as the question :eek:
Hecate


No no, you interpreted the question exactly as I did, and I like the "active/passive" power way of explaining it.

The submissive buys the ticket; the dominant is both the vehicle and the destination. That's my take.
 
It's because the D/s power exchange is an inversely proportionate two way symbiosis that channels constantly back and forth and is of such complexity, and yet simplicity, that who gives/gets the power is an endless enigma and can be stated in a multiplicity of ways.

I still say the answer is Plankton. :)
 
DVS said:
I think what you're getting at is...why would a woman who's in control of her life, successful and confident want to give up that power to another in her sex life?

Well, there are many women who are this way. And, many men, too. The mental stress of such a life in control is overwhelming for a lot of people. And, even though they might enjoy this type of thing in their day to day life, when it's time to be at home and relax with their SO, they want to stop being in control, stop being the boss, stop barking out orders and making decisions...

Now, they want to let someone else take charge...be the boss, bark out orders and make all of the decisions for them. In fact, they just want to be the toy for someone's sexual contol. It's just part of an intricate power exchange that many people go through...and one side balances out the other making theirs a well balanced life.

She's a powerful boss by day, and a submissive servicing her Dom's every whim by night. And, coming from a Dom...I LIKE it! :nana:

You state things so beautifully! I particularly like the idea of a well balanced life!

Fury:rose:

Hecate said:
Maybe I can try my hand at mind reading too?

... and so I will insert a few words that I read between the lines here...



I think the answer lies in the way you interprete the words control and power.
Of course the submissive remains in control of whether or not he/she wants this kind of relation and to what extend, but once that is established there is a shift of power and control inside that defined relation - I can't find a better word than "active / passive" power and control (and that is not meant in a physically active/passive sense).

It is those different types of "power" that appeal to either the sub or dom side, and it is more the difference of type of power/control that the absolute lack or posession thereof.

That all said, I guess my answer is as cryptic as the question :eek:
Hecate

You also beautifully stated this Hecate!

Fury :rose:

brioche said:
He's a shit disturber from the GB.
I can't help preventing people from doing this shit, it's the teacher in me.

*L*

I knew from the get go that he was from the GM. I remembered his last rather provocative question here because it was mentioned on Marquis's thread there and linked.

Fury :rose:

shy slave said:
He is from the GB,

Last weekend (in real life) he saved two submissives asses when we needed instant help.

Not everyone is trouble just because they post on the GB.

I mean, dolf posts there....

Oh Fuck, I just blew my own arguement

Damn Damn Damn

LMAO!

It's good to know he has a good side to him too!

Hey I sometimes post on the GB and I'm no trouble at all!

Fury :rose:

O'Mac said:
I still say the answer is Plankton. :)

I'm think you may be right after all!

*L*

Fury :rose:
 
brioche said:
He's a shit disturber from the GB.
I can't help preventing people from doing this shit, it's the teacher in me.
I knew he was a GBer. I checked his recent posts...those GBers all seem to post one liners...and carry on conversations with one person in the thread, and nobody else in the thread knows what the fuck they are talking about...and so you've got 6 or 8 conversations going on in one thread and unless you are part of one of these conversations, you have no fucking idea what is happening in the thread. I just don't understand those people...oh wait a minute...we have threads like that, too. :rolleyes:

Actually, I didn't think he was a troll, just because he was from the GB. I just thought maybe he was looking for someone to take him under their wing, so to speak, and show him a thing or two about submission.
FurryFury said:
You state things so beautifully! I particularly like the idea of a well balanced life!

Fury:rose:
Why, thank you, sweetie. I know several control by day/submit by night women. And, I've talked at length with at least a couple. And, they happen to be my favorite kind of subs, too (not that there's a bad kind, so saying one kind is a favorite isn't putting down any others). :p
FurryFury said:
You also beautifully stated this Hecate!

Fury :rose:
Actually, I think you are hitting on both of us...saying we both stated it beautifully. Not that I'm bothered by that...
Maybe you just need a little correction...or a lot, maybe. :D
FurryFury said:
*L*

I knew from the get go that he was from the GM. I remembered his last rather provocative question here because it was mentioned on Marquis's thread there and linked.

Fury :rose:
OK, what is the GM?
FurryFury said:
LMAO!

It's good to know he has a good side to him too!

Hey I sometimes post on the GB and I'm no trouble at all!

Fury :rose:
Dolf does have a nice ass, for a GBer. Maybe that's because she use to post here?
FurryFury said:
I'm think you may be right after all!

*L*

Fury :rose:
I've still got some Corned beef and cabbage left overs, if anybody wants some.
 
Last edited:
Maybe he is saying:

You were all so helpful last time.
I've been told submission is(it's) all about giving up. As a dom you are in control. So, why aren't you all doms?

Or even:

You were all so helpful last time.
I've been told death is(it's) all about giving up. But when you kill your self you are in control. So, why aren't you all killing your selves if you are doms?


Look we can all put worlds in his mouth, no offence to other people who have put words inhis mouth.
 
Back
Top