a question for american men

A college girlfriend left me when she met a man that had a big, thick wallet. And when she realized that his wallet was getting smaller, she tried to come back to me. By that time, I had this needy, greedy, bitchy girlfriend who kept me happy, liked me for who I was, not what I was...

And still with the same girl, for the last 29 years, 27 of it married.
 
When you are with a woman and you go from not having money to having money, it changes things but it would be the same the other way around. Now, materal things is another matter. When my car was brand new, it was amazing the difference it made with the ladies. Holy shit! When I moved out of my apartment and bought a house - again, big difference. When I started to travel for vacation - again... I think there is a material security that women find attractive, yes.
 
When you are with a woman and you go from not having money to having money, it changes things but it would be the same the other way around. Now, materal things is another matter. When my car was brand new, it was amazing the difference it made with the ladies. Holy shit! When I moved out of my apartment and bought a house - again, big difference. When I started to travel for vacation - again... I think there is a material security that women find attractive, yes.

You spelled material wrong.
 
seriously, do you honestly believe a woman's interest in you is directly proportional to the size of your wallet?

(not judging, just doing a little statistical investigation)

How successful a man is is something virtually all women consider in evaluating him. With some women it is an up front evaluation that overrules all others. With others it is more subliminal.

Men are more likely to be attracted to a woman's youth - let's say eighteen to twenty-nine. Also, for many men high status in a woman is a negative consideration.
 
seriously, do you honestly believe a woman's interest in you is directly proportional to the size of your wallet?

(not judging, just doing a little statistical investigation)

I am married to the guy I am married to because of his money. I know it and he knows it too. We mutually use each other and I know I am okay with that. Apparently he is okay with that, too.
 
How successful a man is is something virtually all women consider in evaluating him. With some women it is an up front evaluation that overrules all others. With others it is more subliminal.

Men are more likely to be attracted to a woman's youth - let's say eighteen to twenty-nine. Also, for many men high status in a woman is a negative consideration.

That's why I have all these middle-aged women banker presidents to myself....
 
I am married to the guy I am married to because of his money. I know it and he knows it too. We mutually use each other and I know I am okay with that. Apparently he is okay with that, too.

If that is you in your avatar it is obvious why he married you.

If I was rich I would still try to win a woman's heart.
 
I am married to the guy I am married to because of his money. I know it and he knows it too. We mutually use each other and I know I am okay with that. Apparently he is okay with that, too.

yes, well, i don't intend on buying into your posting since i haven't the time or inclination to sift through seeking truths over roleplay. i'm okay with that.
 
yes, well, i don't intend on buying into your posting since i haven't the time or inclination to sift through seeking truths over roleplay. i'm okay with that.

Her sig line makes it clear it's all roleplay. Some of it might be the truth, as well, but it's all roleplay.
 
Here is the skinny.

It is normal for a women to "qualify her potential mate". However, the dysfunctional women of the GB along with the pandering men want us to believe women are somehow above all that. That somehow they ignore normal instinct.

Nobody wants a loser in a man. end of story. i never once stated that his income was the only motivating factor; however, his ability to provide and contribute financially is certainly of importance.

There is obviously no reason to provide links to these studies because the losers will tell you how that study or Doctor was discredited though they provide no links showing such or they just lack reading comprehension skills.

And you won't bother to read the study anyway, you'll just quote the lines that agree with you and being intellectual fraud you are, will delete the lines that disagree from your "proof".

You also won't bother to research the names you cite and find their other works. And I won't post them for you.

But you've proved you're a fraud and a moron in this thread. Thanks for that.
 
weirdness you wouldn't get in america.

i love my job and it pays like shit. some of the clients are quite wealthy. in america i would be expected to defer to them. here it's slightly awkward...
after a few months in the job i figured out a serious problem: my clients were often feeling like they should defer to me, with some of them being obviously very uncomfortable having me work for them. why? because they have 'common' accents and i speak in an accent associated with a higher social class. i started deliberately slaughtering the english language and, like magic, my clients were comfortable in my company.

I thought all of the English deliberately slaughtered the English language.
 
I thought all of the English deliberately slaughtered the English language.

One of my best friends is an English ex-pat. He was educated in Eton and Oxford, his family owns a huge estate and he's basically rich as a lord (although he claims no titles). He can speak with any accent he desires, from Eton to Alabama, and he does so depending on how he wishes to be taken by his listener. Dolf is verifying that which I've seen a hundred times from him.
 
One of my best friends is an English ex-pat. He was educated in Eton and Oxford, his family owns a huge estate and he's basically rich as a lord
is he single?

bwahahahahahaha
 
Back
Top