Lmizzler
SensualSwisArmyKnife
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2020
- Posts
- 7,798
Nominated for assuming I was wank-free.Where the fuck have you been? Nominated for not getting a nomination in weeks.
Just cause I wasn't here doesn't mean I wasn't wanking.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nominated for assuming I was wank-free.Where the fuck have you been? Nominated for not getting a nomination in weeks.
Nominated for apparently not knowing what "egregious" means.Nominated for egregious crimes against an AV
Nominated for thinking I don’t and also that I didn’t mean it exactly how I said it.Nominated for apparently not knowing what "egregious" means.
Nominated for doubling down and still being incorrect.Nominated for thinking I don’t and also that I didn’t mean it exactly how I said it.
Nominated for confusery. That seems like a valid use of egregious.Nominated for doubling down and still being incorrect.
Nominated for not updating us before on your wanking status.Nominated for assuming I was wank-free.
Just cause I wasn't here doesn't mean I wasn't wanking.
Nominated for this nonsenseJust look at the usernames of who is posting.
Nominated for calling common sense, nonsense.Nominated for this nonsense
Nominated for thinking common sense has any place here.Nominated for calling common sense, nonsense.
Nominated for not having my whole thread on fake ignore.You can’t see the post above by this member because they are on fake ignore.
Nominated for selfishly keeping your wanking private.Nominated for assuming I was wank-free.
Just cause I wasn't here doesn't mean I wasn't wanking.
Nominated for saying "confusery." There are perfectly valid, actual words you could use. And just having an av does not make it egregious.Nominated for confusery. That seems like a valid use of egregious.
Just as egregious is a perfectly valid adjective for crimes. Just because you don't agree with the crimes, doesn't make them egregious to someone else.Nominated for saying "confusery." There are perfectly valid, actual words you could use. And just having an av does not make it egregious.
Fair enough. But "confusery" is right out.Just as egregious is a perfectly valid adjective for crimes. Just because you don't agree with the crimes, doesn't make them egregious to someone else.
Nominated for being a grammar and spelling nerd.Fair enough. But "confusery" is right out.
Nominated for not bringing this to the bedroom*puts on super mario costume and points to her vagina*
It’s a Mia Focina!
*giggles like a child*
Yet.Nominated for not bringing this to the bedroom![]()
Nominated for causing confusing arousal*puts on super mario costume and points to her vagina*
It’s a Mia Focina!
*giggles like a child*
Nominated for being confusedNominated for causing confusing arousal
If that's a nominatable offence you might as well give me a standing nomination every week.Nominated for being confused
Fuck that, who has time for that shit? You’re all figments of my imagination anyway, so in a way, you were all there during the wanking.I hope you remembered to video it for the PoJ
Yeah, she should have said ,”tiddies”.Nominated for making me read the word “titty”
Nominated for making me a figure in your imagination and not giving me the imaginary body of Kate UptonFuck that, who has time for that shit? You’re all figments of my imagination anyway, so in a way, you were all there during the wanking.
Just:.. nominatedYeah, she should have said ,”tiddies”.
Nominated for thinking she could be improved by having the body of Kate UptonNominated for making me a figure in your imagination and not giving me the imaginary body of Kate Upton
This is how I usually envision you:Nominated for making me a figure in your imagination and not giving me the imaginary body of Kate Upton
Just:.. nominated