███████████ Mueller Investigation Results Thread ███████████

[golfre1974]

fuck off NIGGER

no one wants another holier then thou preaching NIGGER

You sound like a fearful person. And one that probably doesn't get laid much. The things we can say when there is no threat of an asswhipping. Wow!

 

[golfre1974]

An alt is a sock puppet.

Thanks

 

[HisArpy]

You sound like a fearful person. And one that probably doesn't get laid much. The things we can say when there is no threat of an asswhipping. Wow!

So, are saying you want to give BB an ass whipping?

The BDSM forum is thataway --------->

 

[moarBB]

You sound like a fearful person. And one that probably doesn't get laid much. The things we can say when there is no threat of an asswhipping. Wow!

oh fuck off with this tired oversused insult SHIT, NIGGER

 

[HisArpy]

oh fuck off with this tired oversused insult SHIT, NIGGER

What he said.

Or break out the handcuffs, leather, and lube.

 

[golfre1974]

So, are saying you want to give BB an ass whipping?

The BDSM forum is thataway --------->

That one actually made me chuckle.

 

[HisArpy]

That one actually made me chuckle.

We can fix that.

 

[RoryN]

“The reason, again, that you did not indict Donald Trump is because of the OLC opinion stating that you cannot indict a sitting president, correct?”

“That is correct."

 

[Que]

You sound like a fearful person. And one that probably doesn't get laid much. The things we can say when there is no threat of an asswhipping. Wow!

Are you threatening an asswhipping? What are your qualifications to administer one?

Shouldn't you more fully flesh out this particular character before you go around trying to intimidate people?

 

[HisArpy]

“The reason, again, that you did not indict Donald Trump is because of the OLC opinion stating that you cannot indict a sitting president, correct?”

“That is correct."

Poor poor rorbags. Acting like Mueller and looking like he's not sure what was said or done already...


http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=91071206&postcount=2746

 

[Que]

“The reason, again, that you did not indict Donald Trump is because of the OLC opinion stating that you cannot indict a sitting president, correct?”

“That is correct."

I'm sure you're going to endlessly repeat that but as has already been pointed out the last time you posted exactly that:

“The reason, again, that you did not indict Donald Trump is because of the OLC opinion stating that you cannot indict a sitting president, correct?”

“That is correct."

Do try and keep up with breaking events:

Mueller adding a correction to his testimony this morning...

"I want to go back to one thing that was said this morning by Mr. Lieu who said, and I quote, 'you didn’t charge the president because of the OLC opinion.' That is not the correct way to say it."

he corrects the RECORD

but not before he POLLUTES the RECORD

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...rection-to-testimony-about-not-charging-trump

Even recovering from anesthesia, Busy is more clear headed and informed than you.

Sad!

 

[Que]

I didn't say the Democrats are competent. My team? I'm an American as I hope you are. I understand it makes it easier to throw mud if you can put the target of the mud into a box. I'm a citizen very concerned about the direction of this country. We are lurching left and right and losing steam with each gyration. I came here to Literotica to yank my crank to some good stories and happened upon this message board. BTW you still haven't explained what an alt is?

This replacement for you is no better than the last Organizing for America hack you were this morning.

You should stick to yanking your own crank. You're no good at yanking ours.

 

[golfre1974]

Are you threatening an asswhipping? What are your qualifications to administer one?

Shouldn't you more fully flesh out this particular character before you go around trying to intimidate people?

Not trying to intimidate. Simply stating that if that character said to me in person what he typed an asswhipping would follow directly.

 

[HisArpy]

Are you threatening an asswhipping? What are your qualifications to administer one?

Shouldn't you more fully flesh out this particular character before you go around trying to intimidate people?

He's not openly from Detroit so that's a possible plus in the "maybe he's serious" column.

OTOH, he doesn't seem to all that willing to go over to that "alternative" forum so maybe he isn't so "serious". Which is too bad because I hear there's all kinds of willing submissive females in there who'd just LUV to have a big strong Dom like him show up.

 

[HisArpy]

Not trying to intimidate. Simply stating that if that character said to me in person what he typed an asswhipping would follow directly.

You do know that threats are a rule violation; right?

 

[Que]

Not trying to intimidate. Simply stating that if that character said to me in person what he typed an asswhipping would follow directly.

Oh really? Is that how you solve all of your disagreements with other people? You sound like a very tough guy.

What's your rap sheet look like? I would imagine the first two three and maybe even four times you pulled that crap you might have been able to plead out but I would think it's some point you'd have to do some hard time in stir for felony assault, am I right?

Always amusing to me how keyboard commandos are instantly certain that the are bigger, stronger and tougher than whichever anonymous person they have entered into a disagreement with.

 

[HisArpy]

Oh really? Is that how you solve all of your disagreements with other people? You sound like a very tough guy.

What's your rap sheet look like? I would imagine the first two three and maybe even four times you pulled that crap you might have been able to plead out but I would think it's some point you'd have to do some hard time in stir for felony assault, am I right?

Always amusing to me how keyboard commandos are instantly certain that the are bigger, stronger and tougher than whichever anonymous person they have entered into a disagreement with.

When you shadow box with yourself down in mom's basement, you always win. Well, except for that one time when the mountain of pizza boxes fell on you but that's only because your shadow cheated and brought friends to help him.

 

[moarBB]

Mueller claimed collusion and conspiracy weren't synonymous and that his investigation didn't look into collusion. His own report literally says collusion and conspiracy are "synonymous."

Is he a LIAR or SENILE or didnt even read "his" report

Here's the full text of the relevant section of the Mueller report:

1. Potential Coordination: Conspiracy and Collusion

As an initial matter, this Office evaluated potentially criminal conduct that involved the collective action of multiple individuals not under the rubric of "collusion," but through the lens of conspiracy law. In so doing, the Office recognized that the word "collud[e]" appears in the Acting Attorney General's August 2, 2017 memorandum; it has frequently been invoked in public reporting; and it is sometimes referenced in antitrust law, see, e.g., Brooke Group v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 509 U.S. 209, 227 (1993). But collusion is not a specific offense or theory of liability found in the U.S. Code; nor is it a term of art in federal criminal law. To the contrary, even as defined in legal dictionaries, collusion is largely synonymous with conspiracy as that crime is set forth in the general federal conspiracy statute, 18 U.S.C. § 371. See Black's Law Dictionary 321 (10th ed. 2014) (collusion is "[a]n agreement to defraud another or to do or obtain something forbidden by law"); 1 Alexander Burrill, A Law Dictionary and Glossary 311 (1871) ("An agreement between two or more persons to defraud another by the forms of law, or to employ such forms as means of accomplishing some unlawful object."); 1 Bouvier's Law Dictionary 352 (1897) ("An agreement between two or more persons to defraud a person of his rights by the forms of law, or to obtain an object forbidden by law.").

 

[golfre1974]

You do know that threats are a rule violation; right?

It's not a threat. It's a theoretical promise. I know that there are only two types of people that say the kinds of things he said.

1. Those that are so frustrated and angry about life they really don't care what happens to them

2. Those that believe that their are no consequences to their actions.

Neither of these people bother me and I am quite comfortable with what I said. I would hope that anyone seeking to ban me would take into account what was said to me first and recognize I have only tried to be civil up to the moment that the insult was hurled.

 

[RoryN]

“The reason, again, that you did not indict Donald Trump is because of the OLC opinion stating that you cannot indict a sitting president, correct?”

“That is correct."

 

[HisArpy]

It's not a threat. It's a theoretical promise. I know that there are only two types of people that say the kinds of things he said.

1. Those that are so frustrated and angry about life they really don't care what happens to them

2. Those that believe that their are no consequences to their actions.

Neither of these people bother me and I am quite comfortable with what I said. I would hope that anyone seeking to ban me would take into account what was said to me first and recognize I have only tried to be civil up to the moment that the insult was hurled.

Stop with the crap. It was a threat because you felt you needed to establish that you're a "tough guy" after your widdle feelers got hurt.

This isn't your safe space. There are people out in the real world who don't give a fuck about your feelings and if you go around threatening, excuse me, theoretically promising, them that you're going to do the beat down on them because you have an opposing viewpoint, then you DESERVE to be banned.

GTFO.

*reported*

 

[Que]

An alt is a sock puppet.

. . .as if he didn't know.

Thanks

Note: no follow-up queries?

His schtick is worse than Russian bots.

"Fare thee well, fine fellow citizen! Apropos of nothing in particular, I wish to share my own original thoughts on my own personal non-scripted concerns about the direction this country is taking that coincidently matches suggested verbiage in the newsletter to "make a difference" in the upcoming election. I am completely non-partisan and my message is for anyone that seeks the truth and just happens to parrot this weeks DNC talking points"

There might be a right-wing equivalent but I haven't bumped into it where they have these idiotic talking points. Stephanopoulos developed the concept of a stock talking point to get everyone on the same page so that everyone's repeating the same nonsense. The reason why they have to do that is be ause you can't flesh it out in an actual debate because it never makes any sense.

 

[bigsly]

https://media.giphy.com/media/jKjN2TBAHsgzS/giphy.gif

 

[Que]

It's not a threat. It's a theoretical promise. I know that there are only two types of people that say the kinds of things he said.

1. Those that are so frustrated and angry about life they really don't care what happens to them

2. Those that believe that their are no consequences to their actions.

Neither of these people bother me and I am quite comfortable with what I said. I would hope that anyone seeking to ban me would take into account what was said to me first and recognize I have only tried to be civil up to the moment that the insult was hurled.

"But Mommm, I was CIVIL until HE started it by saying mean things to me! I had no choice but to intimate that physical violence was a viable response to such an insult!!"

So which is it? You would commit felony assault for that insult, if you were afforded the opportunity to do so, or you would not?

 

[Que]

https://media.giphy.com/media/jKjN2TBAHsgzS/giphy.gif

Rory's made three identical attempts to kick the football on the one and only money quote from the hearing, even AFTER Mueller walked it back.