███████████ Mueller Investigation Results Thread ███████████

[HisArpy]

I've read the report and have cited in other Lit posts the most egregious incidents of Trump obstructing the law. Others who have read the report have also posted the specific evidence but you dummies refuse to accept the fact that everything shihead does is with corrupt intent. So no, I'm not going to play your silly game. I'm not inclined to waste my time trying to educate card carrying members of the GOPKKK.

So THE REPORT which explicitly says that "no American" assisted a foreign government in altering the election of 2016, yet somehow in your mind proves that Trump is a Russian puppet?

THE REPORT which also details 10 "offenses" and lays out the circumstance for those "offenses" THEN ALSO LISTS the exculpatory evidence which defeats those "offenses"?

That report?

 

[moarBB]

Attempts to hide his finances............HE CAN, EVERYONE CAN, ITS NO ONE'S BIZ........... and not only refusing to testify to Mueller probe personally.........HE DOESNT HAVE TO.......... as well as constant rejection of testimony by his administration officials before Congress......EXECUTIVE PRIV....LEGAL........... and his admission of attempting to fire those legally probing him--to the extent of trying to get a private citizen to do the firing are all declared and open instances of obstruction of justice.......AS THE EXEC, THE CONSTITUTION ALLOWS THEM, and IT WASNT A PVT CITIZEN, IT WAS THE PERSON WHO COULD DO THE FIRING......... The Mueller report and Mueller's own testimony to Congress repeatedly call Trump out for lying under oath,......HE WAS NEVER UNDER OATH, YOU MADE THIS UP.......... which was the only offense for which Clinton was broad forward for impeachment. Trump's publicly exhibited crimes go way beyond what Clinton was impeached for and are in many other dimensions.

That the Trumpettes here refuse to see that is just a reflection that they are ethically and morally rotten in their core, just as the corrupt, criminal, Russian asset, sexual predator, racist, neo-Nazi, congenital lying, Saudi murder-complicit, kidnapping, draft-dodging, slum landlord fraud, Donald Trump is.

Idiot

 

[moarBB]

So THE REPORT which explicitly says that "no American" assisted a foreign government in altering the election of 2016, yet somehow in your mind proves that Trump is a Russian puppet?

THE REPORT which also details 10 "offenses" and lays out the circumstance for those "offenses" THEN ALSO LISTS the exculpatory evidence which defeats those "offenses"?

That report?

 

[HisArpy]

Attempts to hide his finances and not only refusing to testify to Mueller probe personally as well as constant rejection of testimony by his administration officials before Congress and his admission of attempting to fire those legally probing him--to the extent of trying to get a private citizen to do the firing are all declared and open instances of obstruction of justice. The Mueller report and Mueller's own testimony to Congress repeatedly call Trump out for lying under oath, which was the only offense for which Clinton was brought forward for impeachment. Trump's publicly exhibited crimes go way beyond what Clinton was impeached for and are in many other dimensions. Those who innocently don't see it (and the Trumpettes here are just playing the game) are idiots and/or analytically incompetent.

That the Trumpettes here refuse to see that is just a reflection that they are ethically and morally rotten in their core, just as the corrupt, criminal, Russian asset, sexual predator, racist, neo-Nazi, congenital lying, Saudi murder-complicit, kidnapping, draft-dodging, slum landlord fraud, Donald Trump is.

\


It is not a "crime" to keep your tax records and financial dealing private.
It is not a "crime" to assert your 5th Amendment Rights.
It is not a "crime" to assert the powers, privileges and authority of your office.
It is not a "crime" to deny the slurs and slanders raised by those opposed to your election to office.

Your obvious mental instability notwithstanding, dehumanizing other people on the basis of dislike of a particular person is insane.

 

[LincolnDuncan]

So THE REPORT which explicitly says that "no American" assisted a foreign government in altering the election of 2016, yet somehow in your mind proves that Trump is a Russian puppet?

THE REPORT which also details 10 "offenses" and lays out the circumstance for those "offenses" THEN ALSO LISTS the exculpatory evidence which defeats those "offenses"?

That report?

You must be referring to the Barr report

 

[HisArpy]

You must be referring to the Barr report

There is no "Barr Report" dumass.

The report which Mueller submitted under the statute which requires it, is as I laid out above.

The fact that you don't know that, or refuse to acknowledge it, merely shows that you don't care about truth. You only care about salving your TDS and obeying the dictates it demands of you to continue to spread lies.

Shameful really. A grown man like yourself too.

 

[Que]

\


It is not a "crime" to keep your tax records and financial dealing private.
It is not a "crime" to assert your 5th Amendment Rights.
It is not a "crime" to assert the powers, privileges and authority of your office.
It is not a "crime" to deny the slurs and slanders raised by those opposed to your election to office.

Your obvious mental instability notwithstanding, dehumanizing other people on the basis of dislike of a particular person is insane.

Keep in mind this is the same author of extremely bad fiction who has doxxed himself into non-existence.

He starts by asserting that he's one of a very select number of Blackbitd drivers. A very short and publicly known list. He asserts that he is one of the names on that small list and that further he can be found as not just an asset of the CIA but an actual trained CIA agent. Trained in such activities as fieldcraft and security. The same CIA that insist that any and all works of fiction and nonfiction that one wishes to publish has to be run by the CIA to ensure that sources and methods are not compromised by your pursuits.

I'm thinking that if any of the above was true the CIA would have a problem with him openly bragging about being exit CIA and an SR71 pilot with a penchant for barely legal young men whilst married to a woman who has no idea he is gay. At his age, during the time he is asserting he was all of these things there is no way a guy with his predilictions could have gotten a security clearance much less past routine polygraphs much less been entrusted with the program as important as black bird was.

On the other hand he's obviously a pathological liar so maybe passing the polygraph is not out of the question.

He has a more implausible backstory than if you combined the resume-padding of Sean and Luk1.

 

[jomar]

"Educate yourself," was the challenge.

That’s what I figured. You can’t.

 

[Rightguide]

That’s what I figured. You can’t.

If you can't find it in 10 fucking seconds, you really are an ignorant dope.

 

[LincolnDuncan]

There is no "Barr Report" dumass.

The report which Mueller submitted under the statute which requires it, is as I laid out above.

The fact that you don't know that, or refuse to acknowledge it, merely shows that you don't care about truth. You only care about salving your TDS and obeying the dictates it demands of you to continue to spread lies.

Shameful really. A grown man like yourself too.

dumass

An illiterate's version of dumb ass.

 

[HisArpy]

dumass

An illiterate's version of dumb ass.

Oooo, I'm hurt.

Really, this time I'm all hurt and stuff. Not like last time when I was only saying I was hurt, this time I'm really hurt. I may have to employ the utmost in magical concoctions to get over it.

Anybody else wanna scoop of ice cream? I know it's early but the amount of hurt I'm suffering from that post could be contagious. Or something.

 

[jomar]

I linked it dumass.

Art I conveys the doctrine of Separation of Powers. In the "vesting clause" it creates the office of the Presidency and charges that office with the responsibility of administering the laws.

So, in Art I we have the creation of the exec branch which is a co-equal branch of the government and separate from the other 2 branches.

It is under this Article where the Presidency derives it's authority from.

Art II enumerates the various powers and responsibilities of the President. Under Art II Congress doesn't have the power or authority to limit who the President fires. (See: Meyers).

THAT MEANS that Trump could have fired Mueller and Congress couldn't do anything about it.

THAT MEANS that Trump could have claimed privilege and not cooperate with Mueller or Congress.

THAT MEANS there isn't anything you or Congress could do about it and jumping up and down and shouting won't change that one bit.


Now that you know, stop with the crapfest about how Trump "obstructed justice". He had the power and authority to do what he actually never did.

You might have some knowledge being a lawyer, but I have no doubt RG doesn't. I'm sure he googled "President's Article I authority" then said "the challenge was to educate yourself" when he failed to find anything.

Yes Trump had the authority to fire Muellor or not cooperate. That's not the issue. The issue is obstruction.

Here...Legal Definition of obstruction of justice

: the crime or act of willfully interfering with the process of justice and law especially by influencing, threatening, harming, or impeding a witness, potential witness, juror, or judicial or legal officer or by furnishing false information in or otherwise impeding an investigation or legal process
https://www.merriam-webster.com/legal/obstruction**0of**0justice

or here...18 U.S.C. § 1503 defines "obstruction of justice" as an act that "corruptly or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, influences, obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede, the due administration of justice."
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/obstruction_of_justice

The presidential authority you cited in article I and II do not include the president's legal authority to obstruct justice, which is what part 2 of the Mueller report is all about.

So how do you, a lawyer, view presidential authority under Art I and II as allowing obstruction of justice?

How many times did you take the bar before you passed it?

 

[Rightguide]

Oooo, I'm hurt.

Really, this time I'm all hurt and stuff. Not like last time when I was only saying I was hurt, this time I'm really hurt. I may have to employ the utmost in magical concoctions to get over it.

Anybody else wanna scoop of ice cream? I know it's early but the amount of hurt I'm suffering from that post could be contagious. Or something.

It's gotta be hard to suppress an involuntary giggle snort when confronted by a retarded lunatic insisting you're a dumbass.

 

[jomar]

If you can't find it in 10 fucking seconds, you really are an ignorant dope.

LOL, again, what I thought. You could have provided a link and said "there, dumbass."

But you couldn't, could you.

 

[Rightguide]

You might have some knowledge being a lawyer, but I have no doubt RG doesn't. I'm sure he googled "President's Article I authority" then said "the challenge was to educate yourself" when he failed to find anything.

Yes Trump had the authority to fire Muellor or not cooperate. That's not the issue. The issue is obstruction.

Here...Legal Definition of obstruction of justice

: the crime or act of willfully interfering with the process of justice and law especially by influencing, threatening, harming, or impeding a witness, potential witness, juror, or judicial or legal officer or by furnishing false information in or otherwise impeding an investigation or legal process
https://www.merriam-webster.com/legal/obstruction**0of**0justice

or here...18 U.S.C. § 1503 defines "obstruction of justice" as an act that "corruptly or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, influences, obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede, the due administration of justice."
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/obstruction_of_justice

The presidential authority you cited in article I and II do not include the president's legal authority to obstruct justice, which is what part 2 of the Mueller report is all about.

So how do you, a lawyer, view presidential authority under Art I and II as allowing obstruction of justice?

How many times did you take the bar before you passed it?

Give you a little hint, sonny. To be guilty of Obstruction, one has to have "corrupt intent," there has to be an underlying crime to obstruct, and the President cannot be guilty of Obstruction of Justice when exercising his Article II (Constitutional) authority.

 

[Rightguide]

LOL, again, what I thought. You could have provided a link and said "there, dumbass."

But you couldn't, could you.

I shouldn't have to direct you to Article I of the Constitution, fer Christ's sake.

Do I have to direct you to the friggin' alphabet as well??

 

[contrifan32]

Attempts to hide his finances and not only refusing to testify to Mueller probe personally as well as constant rejection of testimony by his administration officials before Congress and his admission of attempting to fire those legally probing him--to the extent of trying to get a private citizen to do the firing are all declared and open instances of obstruction of justice. The Mueller report and Mueller's own testimony to Congress repeatedly call Trump out for lying under oath, which was the only offense for which Clinton was brought forward for impeachment. Trump's publicly exhibited crimes go way beyond what Clinton was impeached for and are in many other dimensions. Those who innocently don't see it (and the Trumpettes here are just playing the game) are idiots and/or analytically incompetent.

That the Trumpettes here refuse to see that is just a reflection that they are ethically and morally rotten in their core, just as the corrupt, criminal, Russian asset, sexual predator, racist, neo-Nazi, congenital lying, Saudi murder-complicit, kidnapping, draft-dodging, slum landlord fraud, Donald Trump is.

You forgot mass murderer of kitties and puppies

 

[KeithD]

You forgot mass murderer of kitties and puppies

That response reflects your ethnical and moral degeneracy.

 

[moarBB]

You might have some knowledge being a lawyer, but I have no doubt RG doesn't. I'm sure he googled "President's Article I authority" then said "the challenge was to educate yourself" when he failed to find anything.

Yes Trump had the authority to fire Muellor or not cooperate. That's not the issue. The issue is obstruction.

Here...Legal Definition of obstruction of justice

: the crime or act of willfully interfering with the process of justice and law especially by influencing, threatening, harming, or impeding a witness, potential witness, juror, or judicial or legal officer or by furnishing false information in or otherwise impeding an investigation or legal process
https://www.merriam-webster.com/legal/obstruction**0of**0justice

or here...18 U.S.C. § 1503 defines "obstruction of justice" as an act that "corruptly or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, influences, obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede, the due administration of justice."
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/obstruction_of_justice

The presidential authority you cited in article I and II do not include the president's legal authority to obstruct justice, which is what part 2 of the Mueller report is all about.

So how do you, a lawyer, view presidential authority under Art I and II as allowing obstruction of justice?

How many times did you take the bar before you passed it?

yeah but MuleLiar said he wasnt interefered with

didya miss that?

 

[moarBB]

Former special counsel Robert Mueller testified on Wednesday that his investigation was not hindered or curtailed, reassuring anyone worried that he wasn’t able to fully carry out the inquiry.

Mueller made this assertion in response to questioning from Rep. Doug Collins (R-GA), the ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee. Collins, in a series of rapid-fire questions, asked the special counsel whether “your investigation [was] curtailed or stopped or hindered?”

“No,” Mueller responded.

 

[jomar]

Give you a little hint, sonny. To be guilty of Obstruction, one has to have "corrupt intent," there has to be an underlying crime to obstruct, and the President cannot be guilty of Obstruction of Justice when exercising his Article I (Constitutional) authority.

Give you a little hint, geezer. You quoted the legal definition of obstruction in your response to me, but don't understand it. It said nothing about an underlying crime, but Trump did have corrupt intent. Go reread it.

And I think you meant to say a president can't be held accountable for obstructing justice while in office. Unless his crimes reach a level where impeachment is pursued, of course.

 

[jomar]

yeah but MuleLiar said he wasnt interefered with

didya miss that?

That's because Trump's obstruction efforts fell short. But you know that.

 

[phrodeau]

Give you a little hint, sonny. To be guilty of Obstruction, one has to have "corrupt intent," there has to be an underlying crime to obstruct, and the President cannot be guilty of Obstruction of Justice when exercising his Article I (Constitutional) authority.

There is evidence of corrupt intent in the Mueller report, and there were plenty of underlying crimes to obstruct. There have even been convictions for some of those crimes.

 

[jomar]

I shouldn't have to direct you to Article I of the Constitution, fer Christ's sake.

Do I have to direct you to the friggin' alphabet as well??

Oh, THAT's what you meant. Why didn't you say so instead of some weird citation. You should really learn how to write what you meant to say.

 

[KeithD]

That's because Trump's obstruction efforts fell short. But you know that.

So, we should be adding 'bumbler" to those adjectives for the board Trumpettes' mentor.