███████████ Mueller Investigation Results Thread ███████████

[Rightguide]

CNN and NBC have a lot of fuckers brainwashed.

They've lied to millions of weak minded people like Duncan for three years now. The vast leftist brainwashing has had an effect. They, the Democrat Party and their media masters, may perpetuate another civil war in the United States in years to come.

 

[Rightguide]

What laws were broken? Please CITE THE SPECIFIC LAW and provide citation to actual evidence supporting your claims. (Please note that citing to "the Mueller report" or it's contents is insufficient for this. Be specific. Also, include any exculpatory evidence which may contradict your claims.)

Until the next case of beer, that will be the end of his legal burps on this subject for the day.

 

[KeithD]

So this is your new tagline? Coming from you its even more pathetic then your advanced case of TDS

Thanks. I'm fine with being opposed by someone who is ethically and morally degenerate, like you and the other Trumpettes here. It's a good tag line and goes directly at your despicable attitudes and behavior. Happily, you are doing this irrelevantly and impotently on a porn discussion board. Congrats, or something. Your idiocy is sustained, and if I can be part of keeping you holed up here, triggered and foaming at the mouth here rather than someplace where it might mean something, fine.

 

[HisArpy]

Thanks. I'm fine with being opposed by someone who is ethically and morally degenerate, like you and the other Trumpettes here. It's a good tag line and goes directly at your despicable attitudes and behavior. Happily, you are doing this irrelevantly and impotently on a porn discussion board. Congrats, or something. Your idiocy is sustained, and if I can be part of keeping you holed up here, triggered and foaming at the mouth here rather than someplace where it might mean something, fine.

Quite a self-projecting image you have there Detroit.

Tell us, how much lower will you go in your quest to make people with different political beliefs less than human?

 

[jomar]

That's because you're ignorant about what constitutes Obstruction of Justice, the President's Article I authority, and the Constitution, and its principle of separation of Powers. Educate yourself before posting.

I’m game. Please provide a link to the President's Article I authority so I can educate myself.

 

[Que]

It's irrelevant what his motivation was for breaking the law on numerous occasions, HE BROKE THE LAW. We are a nation of laws, are we not?

The law requires corrupt intent. Being annoyed at being harrassed and talking about doing something about the harrassment but ultimately not taking any action including remedies freely available to him were not crimes.

He could have, quite legally ended the investigation at any time. He could have claimed executive privilege for every word uttered by him, to him or in his presence.

He didn't because the Democrats would have impeached him over allegations of conspiring with Rooskies. . . .which did not happen...which he knew did not happen. . .which everyone without TDS knew early did not happen.. .which absolute numbekulls with TDSlike fakespypilot STILL insist did happen.

 

[LincolnDuncan]

What laws were broken? Please CITE THE SPECIFIC LAW and provide citation to actual evidence supporting your claims. (Please note that citing to "the Mueller report" or it's contents is insufficient for this. Be specific. Also, include any exculpatory evidence which may contradict your claims.)

STFU and read the Mueller report

 

[notfeasance]

The law requires corrupt intent.

No Mens Rea, a big nothing sammich.

A 2 Year Whinefest. Hillary's "revenge". Ha!

All she did was ensure his second term.

 

[moarBB]

It's irrelevant what his motivation was for breaking the law on numerous occasions, HE BROKE THE LAW. We are a nation of laws, are we not?

CriminalComey said CuntClinton DIDNT INTEND to break the law, though she did and because she didnt they wont prosecute

Did you forget?

 

[LincolnDuncan]

Trump could be in prison for the rest of is fucked up life and you clowns will still be asking what law he broke.

 

[moarBB]

STFU and read the Mueller report

there are 10 instances cited there

NON OF WHICH HAPPENED, did they, NIGGER?

 

[moarBB]

It's irrelevant what his motivation was for breaking the law on numerous occasions, HE BROKE THE LAW. We are a nation of laws, are we not?

NIGGER said that about illegal aliens

but nw you NIGGERS forget that ILLEGAL ALIENS BREAK THE LAWS

fuck you NIGGER with selective anger

 

[phrodeau]

News of the Mueller testimony on Russia-24 from Moscow is found to be more fair and balanced than Fox News.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/russi...ngs-were-hilarious?source=twitter&via=desktop

 

[phrodeau]

I’m game. Please provide a link to the President's Article I authority so I can educate myself.

Nice.

 

[HisArpy]

I’m game. Please provide a link to the President's Article I authority so I can educate myself.

In relevant part:

In combination with the Vesting Clauses of the Article Two and Article Three, the Vesting Clause of Article One establishes the separation of powers among the three branches of the federal government.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_One_of_the_United_States_Constitution

At times the president has asserted the power to remove individuals from office. ... In Myers v. United States,[23] the Supreme Court held that Congress could not limit the president's power to remove an executive officer.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_Two_of_the_United_States_Constitution

 

[Que]

No Mens Rea, a big nothing sammich.

A 2 Year Whinefest. Hillary's "revenge". Ha!

All she did was ensure his second term.

They cannot grasp or will not acknowledge the basic, essential concept in English, so maybe Layin will help. ~shrug~

Interestingly, many are Hillary apologists where the many statute she repeatedly violated expressly does not require intent. It requires that anyone with access to classified materials keep it secure. Merely causing classified information to become unsecured or being in possession of unsecured classified information is prima facie evidence of guilt. That said I can see some problems with that statute for the reasons we're discussing. It's kind of a problem that you can accidentally commit a crime.

On the other hand the guy that was whispering in Mueller's ear took an actual hammer to actual devices that were the either the subject of subpoena or were known to contain discoverable information. There's absolutely no question that he committed a willful act of obstruction of justice and there is no question as to his intent. I doubt he carries a hammer in his briefcase.

 

[HisArpy]

STFU and read the Mueller report

I did. Did you?

Can you point to EVIDENCE supporting the claim you made that a law was broken?

The report contains no such evidence. It speaks to the existence of such, but doesn't include it.

On a further note: the report ALSO speaks to additional evidence which, when viewed in the totality of ALL the evidence, shows that Trump may not have committed any offense.

Finally, in cases where the evidence may be viewed as both equally favorably and unfavorably toward an accused, the balance ALWAYS tips in favor of the accused and against the government.

So again, please cite to the SPECIFIC LAW and citations to EVIDENCE supporting your claims and include any exculpatory evidence which rebuts it. And, as I said in my above post, citations to the Mueller report are insufficient. Do your own homework and stop parroting the memes by the kool aid drinkers.

 

[OldJourno]

WASHINGTON, D.C.—Robert Mueller was being criticized for seemingly answering questions slowly, not recalling key details of his investigation, and appearing to be confused throughout his testimony Wednesday.

After a brief recess, Mueller insisted he was entirely lucid.
"I hear a few murmurs out there that I've lost it," he said. "Well, I haven't lost it. I've still got it. In fact, I'm still sharp as a tack."
Before testimony could resume, however, Mueller interrupted the proceedings, appearing to reach for his cell phone. "I really have to take this," he said apologetically as he reached into his pocket and pulled out a banana. "Yeah, go for Bob."
Mueller proceeded to have what appeared to be a five-minute conversation on the fruit as bewildered congresspeople looked on. "Well, tell them I don't want to be there this Friday. Matlock's on, you know that. You know I don't go out when Matlock is on." He shrugged apologetically at those in the room, mouthing "sorry."
"Look, if the consulate has a problem with that, tell them they can call me themselves," he concluded, slamming the banana back down on the table.
At publishing time, Mueller was seen giving clear, concise, lucid testimony to a soap dispenser in the restroom.
From the Babylon Bee

 

[jomar]

In relevant part:

Thanks, but that’s not what he referenced. He specifically said the President's Article I authority. Let him link that.

 

[LincolnDuncan]

I did. Did you?

Can you point to EVIDENCE supporting the claim you made that a law was broken?

The report contains no such evidence. It speaks to the existence of such, but doesn't include it.

On a further note: the report ALSO speaks to additional evidence which, when viewed in the totality of ALL the evidence, shows that Trump may not have committed any offense.

Finally, in cases where the evidence may be viewed as both equally favorably and unfavorably toward an accused, the balance ALWAYS tips in favor of the accused and against the government.

So again, please cite to the SPECIFIC LAW and citations to EVIDENCE supporting your claims and include any exculpatory evidence which rebuts it. And, as I said in my above post, citations to the Mueller report are insufficient. Do your own homework and stop parroting the memes by the kool aid drinkers.

I've read the report and have cited in other Lit posts the most egregious incidents of Trump obstructing the law. Others who have read the report have also posted the specific evidence but you dummies refuse to accept the fact that everything shihead does is with corrupt intent. So no, I'm not going to play your silly game. I'm not inclined to waste my time trying to educate card carrying members of the GOPKKK.

 

[Rightguide]

I’m game. Please provide a link to the President's Article I authority so I can educate myself.

"Educate yourself," was the challenge.

 

[moarBB]

I've read the report and have cited in other Lit posts the most egregious incidents of Trump obstructing the law. Others who have read the report have also posted the specific evidence but you dummies refuse to accept the fact that everything shihead does is with corrupt intent. So no, I'm not going to play your silly game. I'm not inclined to waste my time trying to educate card carrying members of the GOPKKK.

the now discredited report has NOTHING in there about evidence

all it has is

IF he WOULDA done X it COULD be obstruction

 

[HisArpy]

Thanks, but that’s not what he referenced. He specifically said the President's Article I authority. Let him link that.

I linked it dumass.

Art I conveys the doctrine of Separation of Powers. In the "vesting clause" it creates the office of the Presidency and charges that office with the responsibility of administering the laws.

So, in Art I we have the creation of the exec branch which is a co-equal branch of the government and separate from the other 2 branches.

It is under this Article where the Presidency derives it's authority from.



Art II enumerates the various powers and responsibilities of the President. Under Art II Congress doesn't have the power or authority to limit who the President fires. (See: Meyers).

THAT MEANS that Trump could have fired Mueller and Congress couldn't do anything about it.

THAT MEANS that Trump could have claimed privilege and not cooperate with Mueller or Congress.

THAT MEANS there isn't anything you or Congress could do about it and jumping up and down and shouting won't change that one bit.


Now that you know, stop with the crapfest about how Trump "obstructed justice". He had the power and authority to do what he actually never did.

 

[moarBB]

hey, but we are the GOPKKK

so that means he must be a NIGGER

right?

 

[KeithD]

Attempts to hide his finances and not only refusing to testify to Mueller probe personally as well as constant rejection of testimony by his administration officials before Congress and his admission of attempting to fire those legally probing him--to the extent of trying to get a private citizen to do the firing are all declared and open instances of obstruction of justice. The Mueller report and Mueller's own testimony to Congress repeatedly call Trump out for lying under oath, which was the only offense for which Clinton was brought forward for impeachment. Trump's publicly exhibited crimes go way beyond what Clinton was impeached for and are in many other dimensions. Those who innocently don't see it (and the Trumpettes here are just playing the game) are idiots and/or analytically incompetent.

That the Trumpettes here refuse to see that is just a reflection that they are ethically and morally rotten in their core, just as the corrupt, criminal, Russian asset, sexual predator, racist, neo-Nazi, congenital lying, Saudi murder-complicit, kidnapping, draft-dodging, slum landlord fraud, Donald Trump is.