HisArpy
Loose canon extraordinair
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2016
- Posts
- 43,760
You're obviously not familiar with the logical fallacy of Special Pleading.
He's not familiar with much of anything.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You're obviously not familiar with the logical fallacy of Special Pleading.
@Bigtitsbitch1000x
Your particular view on guns and weapons of war is clearly informed by your experience coming from a worn-torn Balkan (?) country that lacked a fully formed democratically-elected government and was mired in constant unrest and internal violent conflict. I’m sorry for the tough life you’ve had.
That said, suggesting that the US - 159 years after the end of its own civil war - solve its gun violence problems by giving MORE GUNS and even more destructive weapons to everybody is wholly unconvincing. Basically, it sounds like you're suggesting we RESUME our civil war.
We owe the millions of children who live with the constant threat of gun violence in their schools a much better solution.
As I said:
# of unprovoked US Gov't attacks on private citizens fended off by their AR style weapons = 0
# of kids killed, injured or traumatized daily in the US by the threat of AR gun violence = Millions
EVs are heavier than IC cars. They do more damage to roads and are more dangerous to pedestrians. We shouldn’t be spending public money to subsidize private cars of any kind. The sooner we can put the poor transit decisions of the 20th Century behind us the better.How so? Clearly, the whole climate change nonsense and EV's IS a leftist plot to fuck the West over and bring down civilization. What on earth makes you say it isn't?
Yeah yeah yeah, pull the other one. It's got bells on. Putin my ass. Serbian nationalism blew the former Yugoslavia apart. No love lost between Serbs and Croats, nor between any other ethnic group there. Didn't take much to kick that one off and Putin had next to nothing to do with it.The idea that Yugo fell apart because of ancient hatreds and internal conflict is Russ disinformation. Yugo was destroyed by Putin & Co. Because it presented the hope of an effective alternative to a Mafia oligarchic society.
Are you a young Earth creationist, too?LOL do your own research. Most of those "peer reviewed research" papers are based on faked or manipulated data to start with.
If you're that worried about it, cancel volcanic eruptions.
As for the thread topic? Fetishizing? I think not. It's a way of life. Let us rather praise diversity in lifestyle choices!!!! LOL
EVs are heavier than IC cars. They do more damage to roads and are more dangerous to pedestrians. We shouldn’t be spending public money to subsidize private cars of any kind. The sooner we can put the poor transit decisions of the 20th Century behind us the better.
I'm don't get people who get a hard on from guns.You're obviously not familiar with the logical fallacy of Special Pleading.
I ride public transit in LA all the time. Driving is much more dangerous!LOL. It always amuses me to find out how many things we actually agree on. The destruction of the rail system and the old electric tramlines back in the immediate post-WW2 years was such a retrograde move. Now we're spending billions rebuilding them all - something you don't need highly polluting batteries for, and we in the US are sadly behind. Altho one of the ongoing problems we face is the safety of public transit in the face of the barbarian hordes, but there I guess we can beg to differ.
Well that's a relief. The same scientific methods and principles that enable interplanetary colonization and inform us of deep time evolution, also inform us about the risks of anthropogenic climate change.
Very true.I ride public transit in LA all the time. Driving is much more dangerous!
Nice if you can. Where I live, there's transit buses, but if I took them, it'd take me about 2 hours each way to work, as opposed to a thirty minute drive. Not to mention I often start work really early and other times work late, when transit is non-existent. Works much better in high density urban areas, absolutely, and that's where we should be investing in much better transit options - where you get a lot of return on the investment. The other one is high speed rail between major urban areas - East and West Coast USA, largely. Look at what China has done in that area, and Japan for that matter.I ride public transit in LA all the time. Driving is much more dangerous!
LOL. It always amuses me to find out how many things we actually agree on. The destruction of the rail system and the old electric tramlines back in the immediate post-WW2 years was such a retrograde move. Now we're spending billions rebuilding them all - something you don't need highly polluting batteries for, and we in the US are sadly behind. Altho one of the ongoing problems we face is the safety of public transit in the face of the barbarian hordes, but there I guess we can beg to differ.
I take the train to work because it’s faster and safer than driving.Very true.
And stairs are much more dangerous than level floors. All things have relative levels of danger associated with them.
You're right that people are over reliant on cars. I readily admit I'll often scoot over to the coffee shop in my truck for a drink rather than walk the five minutes.I take the train to work because it’s faster and safer than driving.
A couple of days ago I had to use our car for an errand and I thought I would swing by the neighborhood coffee shop to pick up some of my husband’s favorite roast.
Big mistake.
Walking to the shop only takes about ten minutes. After half an hour of trying to find a parking space, I gave up and drove home. I walked over to buy the coffee later.
I don't. We have coffee in the house, I'm not paying that much for the same thing.You're right that people are over reliant on cars. I readily admit I'll often scoot over to the coffee shop in my truck for a drink rather than walk the five minutes.
# of unprovoked US Gov't attacks on private citizens fended off by their AR style weapons = 0
# of kids killed, injured or traumatized daily in the US by the threat of AR gun violence = Millions
These gun threads always go the same way; it's the ammosexual's standard non-reason. It's pointless trying to stop idiots from owning lethal weapons designed and developed over many years to make killing more efficient, if it's possible for a trained assassin to kill someone with a ballpoint pen/screwdriver/thumbnail.
The only question is, how long will it take the same ammosexuals to revert to that point. In the meantime, how many children killed this week?
Chloe has already announced that she doesn't care how many other people's children are killed, the possession of guns is more important. Is everyone else of the same mind?
Yes, we do. Fucking idiots like you that:"but but knives!"
"but but cars!"
"but but Australia!"
"but mah freedumb!"
"but but confiscation!"
"but but teh Nazis!"
blah comma blah comma blah.
Ammosexuals can rationalize anything related to their beloved steel peener substitutes.
We all know wat's wrong.
And you dismiss that guns make it easier for mentally ill people to kill othersYes, we do. Fucking idiots like you that:
1) Dismiss how poorly mental health issues are dealt with in this country.
|
2) Dismiss how obvious it is that criminals do not and will not follow gun laws, no matter how many or how strict you make them.
3) Dismiss the failings of law enforcement in handling people, children included, that have exhibited signs of potential violent behavior. Especially those they have had prior dealings with.
4) Dismiss that the overwhelming majority of law obeying gun owners are not the problem.
Mom was a dope addict as well.
Misogyny is always hand in hand with dumb conservative takes - you can't point to what would appear to be closer to toxic male masculinity and privilege than a drugged up mother.
Yes, we do. Fucking idiots like you that:
1) Dismiss how poorly mental health issues are dealt with in this country.
|
2) Dismiss how obvious it is that criminals do not and will not follow gun laws, no matter how many or how strict you make them.
3) Dismiss the failings of law enforcement in handling people, children included, that have exhibited signs of potential violent behavior. Especially those they have had prior dealings with.
4) Dismiss that the overwhelming majority of law obeying gun owners are not the problem.