SCOTUS Reform

I don't think we should. The framers left that number open so that we could adjust the size of the court to fit the needs of the people. To fix the number of justices only creates a even more exalted prestige for those selected to the posts. Something akin to what the Pope enjoys, only it would be even more lavish and corrupt.

The last days of Rome were like that where the Senate failed to temper its own excesses and the people lost confidence in them. We cannot afford to lose confidence in the Supreme Court.

Those on the left who have been crying over Thomas, and now want to pack the court so all decisions come out "their way, " need to remember Rome and why it fell. Because sure as God made Huns and barbarians, it'll happen here if the Left gets their wish.

<-- is a barbarian and eats MEAT made hot n crispy over a fire. Them Huns live over on the nicer side of the tracks and have something called a dinner party with friends where they do something called a BBQ.

You Lefties are the ones with the lights on in your houses that silhouette your images in the window.

Replying to yourself again?

Pure psycho.
 
I don't think we should. The framers left that number open so that we could adjust the size of the court to fit the needs of the people. To fix the number of justices only creates a even more exalted prestige for those selected to the posts. Something akin to what the Pope enjoys, only it would be even more lavish and corrupt.

The last days of Rome were like that where the Senate failed to temper its own excesses and the people lost confidence in them. We cannot afford to lose confidence in the Supreme Court.

Those on the left who have been crying over Thomas, and now want to pack the court so all decisions come out "their way, " need to remember Rome and why it fell. Because sure as God made Huns and barbarians, it'll happen here if the Left gets their wish.
I missed the bad history in this post. Augustus Caesar seized power from the moribund Senate in 27 BC. The Western Empire didn't fall until 500 years later. The Eastern Empire lasted until Constantinople was overrun by the Turks in 1453 AD

We should certainly guard against losing our democracy to a would-be dictator, but the barbarians are not at the gates.
 
And for those who know better than to be Twits .....

"Young described the outcome of that case as a “six-member majority, eschewing historical analysis,” that “sought fundamentally to redesign the relationship between the sovereign people and the first citizen of the Republic.” "

https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/09/poli...mp-immunity-supreme-court-footnote/index.html

.


The job of the SCOTUS is to do exactly that. A whiny trial court judge complaining about it is only adding to the basis for an appeal of his decisions based on him inserting his personal beliefs into the case.

And yet you dimwits think he's a hero for whining about something unrelated to the matter before him.
 
Doctor told you to get more green leafy veg eh? It certainly doesn’t have any other impact-you are still a douche who doesn’t know shit.


Actually, I like spinach and most other veggies.

That you seem to believe that you're still 5 years old and veggies not being your favorite food choice is obvious in both your post content and your lack of social sophistication.
 
Actually, I like spinach and most other veggies.

That you seem to believe that you're still 5 years old and veggies not being your favorite food choice is obvious in both your post content and your lack of social sophistication.
If I need to believe carbon is in water to be “sophisticated”, you can keep that. All you!
 
Awwww look at you Derp… trying to make a funny.

Not as funny your VP candidate trying to dish out a gotcha… everything he does is Just Dull.


Dull is something your wit is very familiar with.
 
Dull is something your wit is very familiar with.
Look at you.. continuing to try to make a funny.

Tell us more about that C-H2O…grade school kids know that isn’t a thing so it will be comical.

Just watched a Foxworthy show, you aren’t smarter than a 5th grader!
 
Look at you.. continuing to try to make a funny.

Tell us more about that C-H2O…grade school kids know that isn’t a thing so it will be comical.

Just watched a Foxworthy show, you aren’t smarter than a 5th grader!


Lookie, here you are trotting out that you were punked for the world to point and laugh at you again. I bet you think it makes you something special to be so gullible.
 
Lookie, here you are trotting out that you were punked for the world to point and laugh at you again. I bet you think it makes you something special to be so gullible.
Punked? You gotta have some skills, aside from being a loud mouthed idiot, to do that.

Go back and ask a 5th grader to help you out, they are smarter than you.
 
Punked? You gotta have some skills, aside from being a loud mouthed idiot, to do that.

Go back and ask a 5th grader to help you out, they are smarter than you.


<--- has mad skillz and proves it every day.

You, not so much.
 
<--- has mad skillz and proves it every day.

You, not so much.
“Proves it?” Your “skillz” still get laughed at when going to recess. Still a little strange you show up every day, but since you never made it past 5th grade…
 
“Proves it?” Your “skillz” still get laughed at when going to recess. Still a little strange you show up every day, but since you never made it past 5th grade…

Every village needs an idiot. Your village chose you for a good reason.

And of course every good village idiot always draws a crowd. Just like you did...
 
SCrOTUS
Needs to be overhauled.
Causing deaths of adult women and preventing future Americans
Family .. Woman’s.. Doctor’s decision
Get the fuck out of American’s bedrooms!!
 
What we DO need is a Constitutional Amendment setting in stone the size of the Supreme Court, and maybe, just maybe, it's time for a Constitutional Convention to introduce a few other amendments. Clarify the 2nd rather better, create a few new states and reborder a few existing ones, or at least a concrete process for doing so. And maybe downsizing and stripping away big big chunks of the Federal Government.
Can you explain to me, dear Chloe, how fixing the number of SCOTUS justices is going to fix any of the problems we currently face? And this is an honest question I ask of you.
While -- on the other hand -- I fuly agree with you on the need for a new Constitutional Convention. Plus on reforming big chunks as you say of the Federal goverment.
 
Can you explain to me, dear Chloe, how fixing the number of SCOTUS justices is going to fix any of the problems we currently face?

Actually, I cannot see it fixing any of the problems we face.

What it would do is put a stop to the Democrats current fixation on stacking the court, which would be stupid, be cause the next GOP President would just add more and stack it the other way, and so on and son until until the whole thing became to unwieldy to function and disintegrates, which is likely the objective in any case, because its pretty obvious Democrats hate the Constitution because it restricts them from doing whatever they want, and they want to stack SCOTUS for the same reason.

The Democratic Party these days is inherently anti-Constitutional and actively do not wish for, and actively work against, a Constitutional Republican form of Govt. We really need to lock things down so they have not a hope. The list of whats needed is long. Things like depoliticizing the judicial system to start with and god alone knows how you do that. You have to start with the law schools and work thru.....
 
Actually, I cannot see it fixing any of the problems we face.

What it would do is put a stop to the Democrats current fixation on stacking the court, which would be stupid, be cause the next GOP President would just add more and stack it the other way, and so on and son until until the whole thing became to unwieldy to function and disintegrates, which is likely the objective in any case, because its pretty obvious Democrats hate the Constitution because it restricts them from doing whatever they want, and they want to stack SCOTUS for the same reason.

The Democratic Party these days is inherently anti-Constitutional and actively do not wish for, and actively work against, a Constitutional Republican form of Govt. We really need to lock things down so they have not a hope. The list of whats needed is long. Things like depoliticizing the judicial system to start with and god alone knows how you do that. You have to start with the law schools and work thru.....
What a terrible idea, stacking the court to combat the felon's stacking of the court with corrupt Crow-funded lackeys.
 
What a terrible idea, stacking the court to combat the felon's stacking of the court with corrupt Crow-funded lackeys.

LOL. And THIS is a prime example of the ridiculousness of the Democrat's hyperbolic attempts to destroy the judicial system. Presidents nominate a judge for SCOTUS to replace one who dies or retires. The President cannot "stack" the court. He nominates a successor and the Senate confirms or not. We could equally say Democrat Presidents stacked the court with left wing judges for decades. But we don't. Because the accepted practice is that each President nominates judge(s) to succeed those who die. Or retire. Now we have a SCOTUS with a conservative bent, all of a sudden Democrats want to change the system because it doesn't favor them.

Tough. Fucking. Shit. You just illustrated in one sentence everything that is detestable and reprehensible about Democrats, and why we want to roll back just about every piece of legislation and regulation and change Democrats have made. It's almost amusing if it wasn't so dangerous. You really have no idea of the ultimate consequences of what you'd like to do, do you?
 
Back
Top