Wat_Tyler
Allah's Favorite
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2004
- Posts
- 65,660
This is what the Democrat Party wants to do to 80-90 million Trump supporters.
I b'lieve so . . . .
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is what the Democrat Party wants to do to 80-90 million Trump supporters.
The only thing that might help to stave it off is their lack of a work ethic.I b'lieve so . . . .
The only thing that might help to stave it off is their lack of a work ethic.
OK, I whipped out the ole calculator for one load. A Hornady 134 gr. match bullet launched at 3000 fps (this can be achieved without going to max. load.). Without dumping the entire table, the bullet will still be supersonic at 1300 yds with a drop of 34.16 inches. It's still supersonic at 1400 yds but just barely. The BC for this particular bullet is .645.130gr is okay out to 1000 yds but, according to "experts," you really need 140+ to get beyond that point with consistent accuracy. I don't know how legit that claim is but AFAIK only 1 company makes 140gr projectiles in .25 cal. and they're somewhat hard to get.
New powders to take advantage of the huge case capacity compared to the Creedmore would be nice too. Of course you'd need a longer barrel to take advantage of all that push and that adds weight. A stronger receiver is next on the list because of all dat powa.
Eventually you'd end up with a .25 cal Howitzer but man o man would it reach out and touch someone.
They are. As a matter of fact you can resize 06 brass to 8 and shave a little off the neck and you're good to go.Found some La Coruna Mausers for 3 and a half. Eight by 57s. Straight bolts. At least it'd be the same rim as an aught six.
They are. As a matter of fact you can resize 06 brass to 8 and shave a little off the neck and you're good to go.
Good plan.I'd consider a new barrel and chamber. I'm thinking of maybe buying one and then waiting to see what it tells me that it wants to be in its new life.
Good plan.
They are strong alright. They have some idiosyncrasies that you either have to get used to or gunsmithed out.Still alive. Defective firearms, assassins, ninjas, alphabets, and libturds. Nothing defective about Wat's maths scores, however. Allah is truly beneficent.
There also seems to be a few M1917 rifles out there. Aren't they s'posed to be kinda stout?
OK, I whipped out the ole calculator for one load. A Hornady 134 gr. match bullet launched at 3000 fps (this can be achieved without going to max. load.). Without dumping the entire table, the bullet will still be supersonic at 1300 yds with a drop of 34.16 inches. It's still supersonic at 1400 yds but just barely. The BC for this particular bullet is .645.
The 6.5 Creed with the Hornady 147 gr match bullet can be launched at 2650 fps without going to max. load. It is still supersonic at 1400, close to the edge but not as close as the .25. At 1300 yds the drop is 32.56 inches. This bullet has a BC of .697.
As you can see the 6.5 has no overwhelming advantage.
I'm running a heavy 26" barrel with a 1:7 twist. The action is a Lrg. ring Mauser so it's plenty strong enough.
Let's start with the 140 gr. Maybe, but not likely. Physics and chemistry start becoming the limiting factors. The heavier the bullet the slower burning the powder needed and slower burning powders require more grains to the shell. So unless those European powder magicians come up with something we start running into case capacity issues. That can be overcome to an extent by chamber reaming to 25-06 AI but even then you run into issues because you have to seat the bullet so deeply so as to not exceed over all length that space you gained you have now lost to bullet displacement. And compressed loads are never a good idea, ask the boys of turret two of the USS Wisconsin.The .25-06 could be superior but only if they start making longer/heavier projectiles for it. Your tables prove that the 6.5 does better over distance. By how much isn't relevant, it's still "better."
The only other advantage the 6.5 has is less recoil. It's the same with the .308/30.06 where the .308 recoils less by several foot lbs. This is a result of the shorter case and faster powder burn. Using a longer barrel on the .06 helps offset this because you can take advantage of the larger case capacity for more velocity but unless you can stabilize the bullet it's just wasted speed/energy.
I think a 140-142 gr projectile would make the 25-06 really shine over distance and it would carry more energy farther than the Creedmore does. But that's just me and I have no data to back it up.
This guy sees what dense and walkable looks like:
![]()
![]()