wizzard426
Loves Spam
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2006
- Posts
- 1,743
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Your simplistic view of ‘the rule of law’ as a cure for our national issues is not a satisfactory source of guidance. Our nation has experienced polarization, and people have lost trust in the legal system. The events that occurred on January 6th and Donald Trump's attempt to regain power clearly demonstrate this division.
We need to recognize and address the underlying social, economic, and political issues that contribute to social discord and unrest, rather than relying solely on the rule of law. We need to elect leaders who can ensure that our legal system treats all Americans fairly, justly, and with accountability, regardless of their race, gender, or socioeconomic status. The future of our democracy depends on it.
I don’t blindly accept the status quo. That’s why I want to change the law to allow women everywhere in the US to choose whether to get an abortion.
i gave up seeing his posts a long time ago now; nothing but a waste of life's minutes.HisArpy has responded 17 times to this thread. To save time, can someone point to one which might make some sense?
Then run for office, get elected, sponsor a bill to amend the Constitution and get it ratified by the states. Anything else is you whinging and crying
Why do you consistently lose legal arguments to shut-in perverts here?We are a nation of laws. I stand for those laws and made an entire career out of doing so.
Legalizing abortion doesn’t require a Constitutional amendment.Then run for office, get elected, sponsor a bill to amend the Constitution and get it ratified by the states. Anything else is you whinging and crying.
Legalizing abortion doesn’t require a Constitutional amendment.
The RWCJ here are furiously googling "ScarJo" right now.ScarJo was Katie on SNL!![]()
HisArpy has responded 17 times to this thread. To save time, can someone point to one which might make some sense?
The Constitution doesn’t ban any medical procedures. Why would we need to amend it to make a federal law concerning one in particular?Strictly speaking it would but we ignore the Constitution all the fucking time.
Legalizing abortion doesn’t require a Constitutional amendment.
BS, it had little to do with the actual "state of the union." It was a angry disgraceful campaign speech full of lies to the American people. It had more to do the crazed and convoluted "state" of Joe Biden's mind than the "state of the nation." Here are a few facts:Are you summarizing the state of the union speech four years ago?
Amendment XIV, Section 1:The Constitution doesn’t ban any medical procedures. Why would we need to amend it to make a federal law concerning one in particular?
The Constitution doesn’t ban any medical procedures. Why would we need to amend it to make a federal law concerning one in particular?
there's no question, vetteman. if you listened to scientists instead of radical christians, you would know this.The question is, when does a fetus become a person?