Colorado Will Not Be Allowed To Deny Trump Access To Their Presidential Ballot

[ll74]

They have to pass the woke exam before the bar exam.

Which part of that makes their rulings invalid?

 

[DeluxAuto]

Hey, even three of the 7 communists on the Colorado Supreme Court agrees with me.

Are the 6 Republicans who don't agree with you also communists?

You tried.

 

[Rightguide]

The Democrats’ Lawfare Attacks Aren’t Working – Trump Now Leads Joe Biden Among 18-34 Year-Olds​

By Jim Hoft Dec. 22, 2023 8:45 am

President Donald Trump now leads Joe Biden among 18-34 year-olds.

Even the brainwashed kids can’t stand Old Joe.

This must come as a shock for the Marxists committed to total power over the American people. They need a new distraction.

Via the Morning Consult poll.

Poll results here: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/12/democrats-better-launch-another-bogus-lawfare-case-trump/

Like always and Like have said for years, the Left always goes too far.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Here's why the vote in the Colorado Supreme Court went the way it did:

https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AAzV0re.img?w=48&h=48&q=60&m=6&f=png&u=t
Washington Examiner
Follow

Justices who removed Trump from Colorado ballot attended Ivy League law schools​

Story by Kaelan Deese • 2d


The 4-3 majority of liberal Colorado Supreme Court justices who ruled Monday night that former President Donald Trump cannot appear on the 2024 presidential ballot in the state attended Ivy League colleges, while those in dissent attended state law schools.

The four Democratic-appointed justices who ruled to nix Trump from the primary ballot included three Ivy League graduates, showing a stark divide between the legal mindsets of those who were educated at elite institutions compared to the three justices who said they would not remove the Republican front-runner from the state's ballot.

For the first time in history, a state court ruled that Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which disqualifies insurrectionists from running for office, has been used to prevent a presidential candidate from appearing on a state ballot. The decision has been stayed until Jan. 4 to give Trump's attorneys time to appeal to the Supreme Court.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...t-attended-ivy-league-law-schools/ar-AA1lNVR8

They graduated from schools where wokeness and "social justice" is taught in their law schools.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/

So did Ted Cruz and his dad killed JFK.

 

[icanhelp1]

Are the 6 Republicans who don't agree with you also communists?

You tried.

There are many democrats that are against the ruling. I guess it’s a wash.

 

[DeluxAuto]

There are many democrats that are against the ruling. I guess it’s a wash.

Those Dems' opinions are irrelevant in a legal matter, dumbass.

 

[ll74]

There are many democrats that are against the ruling. I guess it’s a wash.

I am against the ruling

 

[Rightguide]

POLITICS

By Trying To Keep Trump Off The Ballot, Democrats Are Staging A Coup In Broad Daylight​

BY: JOHN DANIEL DAVIDSON
DECEMBER 22, 2023

f it wasn’t obvious before now that the left will do anything to stop Donald Trump from winning a second term in the White House, the events of the last few days should leave no doubt in any American’s mind. Democrats, including President Biden, are prepared not only to rig the 2024 election in broad daylight but also to twist the U.S. Constitution and undermine the republic so they can hold on to power.

As most everyone knows by now, an infamous 4-3 majority of the Colorado Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday that voters in their state will not be allowed to cast a ballot for Trump in next year’s presidential election. The court’s outlandish claim is that Trump is ineligible to appear on the ballot because Section 3 of the 14th Amendment says candidates who have “engaged in insurrection” are prohibited from holding public office.

According to the court, which is dominated by left-wing ideologues appointed by Democrat governors (all the judges on the Colorado Supreme Court are Democrats, some are just more radical than others), Trump meets this definition because he “incited” a riot at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. Never mind that Trump has yet to be convicted of a crime associated with Jan. 6 (or any crime for that matter) or that the 14th Amendment doesn’t include the president or vice president in a list of offices to which its Section 3 provision applies. For the leftists on the Colorado Supreme Court, it’s enough to declare Trump an insurrectionist and viola! He’s off the ballot — all in the name of “defending democracy.”

David French called it a “bold, courageous decision,” but setting aside the constitutional/legal debate, consider what it means practically. About 1.4 million Coloradans voted for Trump in 2020. All those voters, if they want to vote for Trump again this time, have been disenfranchised by the court. That’s bad enough, but the left’s strategy here is larger than just one state. Before the ink was dry on the Colorado ruling, California Democrats leapt into action. The lieutenant governor, Eleni Kounalakis, sent a letter to Secretary of State Shirley Weber asking her to “explore every legal option to remove former President Donald Trump from California’s 2024 presidential primary ballot.”

More here: https://thefederalist.com/2023/12/2...mocrats-are-staging-a-coup-in-broad-daylight/

Yes, let's call it what it really is.

 

[icanhelp1]

Those Dems' opinions are irrelevant in a legal matter, dumbass.

Many are congress critters, they’re very relevant.

 

[DeluxAuto]

Many are congress critters, they’re very relevant.

They didn't bring it to the courts and they're not on the court, dumbass.

 

[ll74]

POLITICS

By Trying To Keep Trump Off The Ballot, Democrats Are Staging A Coup In Broad Daylight​

BY: JOHN DANIEL DAVIDSON
DECEMBER 22, 2023

f it wasn’t obvious before now that the left will do anything to stop Donald Trump from winning a second term in the White House, the events of the last few days should leave no doubt in any American’s mind. Democrats, including President Biden, are prepared not only to rig the 2024 election in broad daylight but also to twist the U.S. Constitution and undermine the republic so they can hold on to power.

As most everyone knows by now, an infamous 4-3 majority of the Colorado Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday that voters in their state will not be allowed to cast a ballot for Trump in next year’s presidential election. The court’s outlandish claim is that Trump is ineligible to appear on the ballot because Section 3 of the 14th Amendment says candidates who have “engaged in insurrection” are prohibited from holding public office.

According to the court, which is dominated by left-wing ideologues appointed by Democrat governors (all the judges on the Colorado Supreme Court are Democrats, some are just more radical than others), Trump meets this definition because he “incited” a riot at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. Never mind that Trump has yet to be convicted of a crime associated with Jan. 6 (or any crime for that matter) or that the 14th Amendment doesn’t include the president or vice president in a list of offices to which its Section 3 provision applies. For the leftists on the Colorado Supreme Court, it’s enough to declare Trump an insurrectionist and viola! He’s off the ballot — all in the name of “defending democracy.”

David French called it a “bold, courageous decision,” but setting aside the constitutional/legal debate, consider what it means practically. About 1.4 million Coloradans voted for Trump in 2020. All those voters, if they want to vote for Trump again this time, have been disenfranchised by the court. That’s bad enough, but the left’s strategy here is larger than just one state. Before the ink was dry on the Colorado ruling, California Democrats leapt into action. The lieutenant governor, Eleni Kounalakis, sent a letter to Secretary of State Shirley Weber asking her to “explore every legal option to remove former President Donald Trump from California’s 2024 presidential primary ballot.”

More here: https://thefederalist.com/2023/12/2...mocrats-are-staging-a-coup-in-broad-daylight/

Yes, let's call it what it really is.

So you don't like the 14th amendment.

 

[stxjimmy]

The suit was filed by subversive Democrats, it was tried by Democrats and ruled on by 4 radical Democrats attempting to subvert the Constitution and interfere with the election. This is what communists do.

Your knowledge of communism is about as deep as your knowledge of fascism.

 

[RandyRebecca]

The suit was filed by subversive Democrats, it was tried by Democrats and ruled on by 4 radical Democrats attempting to subvert the Constitution and interfere with the election. This is what communists do.

Communists (that is, real communists, in the Karl Marx sense) set about building workers' democracy with the intent of increasing living standards in order to end the need for money, classes and government to even exist. I don't see Democrats doing that in any way, as they enrich billionaire capitalists, like the Republicans also do.

Communists seek to build workers' own government, judges, laws, armed people etc. and would only do something like an insurrection in order sweep away the capitalist government and authorities at the correct time, such as what the Russian Bolsheviks did in 1917 with the October Revolution. On that day (November 7, 1917, using our calendar), they swept aside the capitalist government and transferred all political power to the Soviets (i.e. workers' councils, which were controlled by workers, peasants and soldiers). This was only done when the Bolsheviks had a majority in the Soviets in the working class dominated cities in Russia, which took months of struggle, so the insurrection was done in order to put all power in workers' hands and sweep aside the capitalists who only take from them.

History is fascinating to learn. It's all out there.

 

[DeluxAuto]

The suit was filed by subversive Democrats, it was tried by Democrats and ruled on by 4 radical Democrats attempting to subvert the Constitution and interfere with the election. This is what communists do.

Republicans masquerading as subversive Democrats? Why do you continue to neglect simple facts, Jack?

We know why!

 

[icanhelp1]

Republicans masquerading as subversive Democrats? Why do you continue to neglect simple facts, Jack?

We know why!

So, do you agree with the ruling? Do you agree that judges can rule a person guilty without due process?

 

[dkovic77]

So, do you agree with the ruling? Do you agree that judges can rule a person guilty without due process?

Fryguy…

Where does it say a conviction is necessary?

Sure fits in with being self-evident, a fine history and tradition.

Maybe if your “champion” lifted a finger to halt what was happening, instead of clearing the way for the day…and having a snack while watching it all happen live on TV. Sure doesn’t seem like full-filling an oath to me.

 

[DeluxAuto]

So, do you agree with the ruling? Do you agree that judges can rule a person guilty without due process?

Quit deflecting, dumbass. I believe in States' Rights. Don't you?

 

[dkovic77]

Quit deflecting, dumbass. I believe in States' Rights. Don't you?

Only States’ rights when it’s something he believes in.

He should remember how long the fries are supposed to be in before taking them out…he’s worked there long enough.

 

[DeluxAuto]

Only States’ rights when it’s something he believes in.

He should remember how long the fries are supposed to be in before taking them out…he’s worked there long enough.

States' Rights for meeee but not for theeee!

These "Federal Constitutionalists" are a waffling bunch of morons.

 

[icanhelp1]

Quit deflecting, dumbass. I believe in States' Rights. Don't you?

States rights for states stuff, I also believe in due process, I don’t believe judges should have the authority to eliminate due process.

 

[icanhelp1]

Fryguy…

Where does it say a conviction is necessary?

Thats a pretty stupid question.

Sure fits in with being self-evident, a fine history and tradition.

Maybe if your “champion” lifted a finger to halt what was happening, instead of clearing the way for the day…and having a snack while watching it all happen live on TV. Sure doesn’t seem like full-filling an oath to me.

Read the speech! There’s much more to the story than “I hate Trump therefore he’s guilty”.

 

[Bray123]

Thats a pretty stupid question.

Because we all know it doesn't say it anywhere, the framers deliberately left out any such requirement. It would have been easier to include it.

And now the poorly educated can pretend that the Constitution does say it and the home educated (totally uneducated) people will hoover it up like all the other lies.

 

[dkovic77]

Thats a pretty stupid question.

So you have legitimate evidence (not from your usually biased “sources” ) to the contrary?

Read the speech! There’s much more to the story than “I hate Trump therefore he’s guilty”.

Ohhh which speech? Would love to read it? The one where he took his oath to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic (and even inside his own head).

The call is coming from inside the dining room! Except he couldn’t even make a call to end the insurrection that was keeping the votes from being tallied which is a key part of our tradition of a peaceful transition of power.

 

[DeluxAuto]

States rights for states stuff, I also believe in due process, I don’t believe judges should have the authority to eliminate due process.

The guy you're carrying water for, trump, wants to be a dictator and threatened due process several times during his reign of error.

How do you reconcile that?

 

[icanhelp1]

Because we all know it doesn't say it anywhere, the framers deliberately left out any such requirement. It would have been easier to include it.

And now the poorly educated can pretend that the Constitution does say it and the home educated (totally uneducated) people will hoover it up like all the other lies.

section I ~ 14th A;

No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.