Colorado Will Not Be Allowed To Deny Trump Access To Their Presidential Ballot

[Bray123]

Poor baby. Somebody hurt your widdle feelers...

From someone who iggys anyone who argues a point!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[YDB95]

This was my reply to lady Honey Bee in July of 2022 when people were defending Gores's actions in the 2000 presidential election:

No, your memory of the event is in fact a fable, certain parts of which have been repeated so often that they are viewed as established fact by many partisans on the left and students of pseudo-history like you LHBee, who have not done their homework. Recall this simple fact, Gore never led in the count, ever. Not before the count, not on election night, not during the count, not after votes were added to Gore's count, or after the final count. Another myth was that Gore wanted to count all of the votes when he actively worked to disqualify overseas military votes and the absentee votes in many Florida counties. Even in the post-election newspaper recounts Bush prevailed. Another favorite trope is a conservative SCOTUS tipped the scales of justice in order to make sure Bush won illegitimately. The vote in the SCOTUS was 7-2.

So my dear (just a figurative assumption there) all of that said, you might want to reflect upon your apparent susceptibility to leftwing propaganda and simply trust in your own ability to seek and find the truth.

You're welcome
RG

Yes, and you got several things wrong, as I pointed out at the time. No point in listing them again, you still won't listen.

 

[Rightguide]

Yes, and you got several things wrong, as I pointed out at the time. No point in listing them again, you still won't listen.

But you can't name them.

 

[YDB95]

But you can't name them.

I can, and I did, last time. The fact that you saw fit to re-post that nonsense without acknowledging that you were called on your bullshit before is exactly why I won't bother this time.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

Enunciation is a word that has both a narrow and a broad meaning. In its narrow sense, it refers to the act or manner of pronouncing words or parts of words clearly in speech. In its broad sense, it refers to the fact or manner of expressing and explaining a plan or principle clearly or formally in any form of communication. That said, the word enunciation can apply to both spoken and written language, as long as the focus is on the clarity and precision of the expression and explanation. I will add that it would have been perhaps better if I had used the word clarity or coherence.

oh fuck off with your bullshit.

Everything about the word is oral....(something you know nothing about since no woman is dumb enough to give it to you)...

Enunciation is from the Latin word enuntiationem, meaning “declaration.” Enunciation is more than pronouncing words clearly; it’s expressing them well, too. No one would mutter a declaration! People with excellent enunciation (also known as diction) are likely to end up broadcasters, announcers, actors, or in other jobs that require public speaking. Politicians need to have good enunciation. People who mumble or speak too quickly have poor enunciation: it's hard to understand them, because their words slur together.

https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/enunciation

 

[stxjimmy]

Show me an article from the GP I have posted that is false

“The Gateway Pundit (TGP) is an American far-right fake news website. The website is known for publishing falsehoods, hoaxes, and conspiracy theories.“

Be quicker for you to show one that’s true - it’s propaganda.

 

[jomar]

“The Gateway Pundit (TGP) is an American far-right fake news website. The website is known for publishing falsehoods, hoaxes, and conspiracy theories.“

Be quicker for you to show one that’s true - it’s propaganda.

He knows, but can’t find his agenda’s talking points on credible sites.

 

[Bn2f]

Colorado Supreme Court removes Trump from 2024 ballot based on 14th Amendment’s ‘insurrectionist ban’​

https://www.cnn.com/2023/12/19/politics/trump-colorado-supreme-court-14th-amendment/index.html

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

Should Nikki Haley and Ron DeSantis be happy or mad? Does this boost their dim prospects or is it a knock out punch? lol.

 

[Lazaran]

Colorado Supreme Court removes Trump from 2024 ballot based on 14th Amendment’s ‘insurrectionist ban’​

https://www.cnn.com/2023/12/19/politics/trump-colorado-supreme-court-14th-amendment/index.html

That ruling is going to force the matter to be taken up by the SCOTUS, and there we shall see if this is a nation of laws or a nation of partisan right wing judges. It should really be an easy call for the three Justices and the Six "justices", because:

A) The corrupt orange traitor clearly fomented, and participated in, an insurrection against the United States.

B) The corrupt orange traitor was clearly an office holder at the time of the insurrection.

C) The Constitution is quite clear that anyone meeting the criteria of both A) and B) is disqualified from ever holding office again.

Any ruling other than disqualification for the corrupt orange traitor is unacceptable under the constitution as written.

*nods*

 

[ll74]

The state court ruled.

Now let's see if states' rights fuckheads continue to preach the same.

 

[YDB95]

Should Nikki Haley and Ron DeSantis be happy or mad? Does this boost their dim prospects or is it a knock out punch? lol.

In a state no Republican has much chance of carrying? It makes no difference.
The only way I could see it mattering is if it would give GOP voters pause about nominating someone who definitely wouldn't be on the ballot in at least one state and might not be in others. But I don't believe it will; this plays right into their victim mentality and they're going to love it.

That ruling is going to force the matter to be taken up by the SCOTUS, and there we shall see if this is a nation of laws or a nation of partisan right wing judges. It should really be an easy call for the three Justices and the Six "justices", because:

Should be, but won't. We both know that. I'll be shocked if the Coathanger Five let this stand.

 

[Lazaran]

In a state no Republican has much chance of carrying? It makes no difference.
The only way I could see it mattering is if it would give GOP voters pause about nominating someone who definitely wouldn't be on the ballot in at least one state and might not be in others. But I don't believe it will; this plays right into their victim mentality and they're going to love it.

Should be, but won't. We both know that. I'll be shocked if the Coathanger Five let this stand.

You may be right. And if so, what should the rightfully aggrieved Americans who are being denied the protection of the constitution by partisan right wing "justices" do in response???



I know what the MAGAts would do if the situation were EXACTLY reversed…

 

[Bn2f]

W

You may be right. And if so, what should the rightfully aggrieved Americans who are being denied the protection of the constitution by partisan right wing "justices" do in response???

Well, if you’re asking me if a ruling against what I believe to be the correct interpretation of constitutional law would make me defecate in a government building then I will resign myself to kicking trump’s ass at the ballot box.

 

[YDB95]

You may be right. And if so, what should the rightfully aggrieved Americans who are being denied the protection of the constitution by partisan right wing "justices" do in response???

Vote for Biden. Like him or not, it's the only way to stop Trump.

Incidentally, even if this ruling stands, I doubt it'll be replicated in any state where Trump has much chance of winning anyway.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

In a state no Republican has much chance of carrying? It makes no difference.
The only way I could see it mattering is if it would give GOP voters pause about nominating someone who definitely wouldn't be on the ballot in at least one state and might not be in others. But I don't believe it will; this plays right into their victim mentality and they're going to love it.

Should be, but won't. We both know that. I'll be shocked if the Coathanger Five let this stand.

I agree it has no bearing on the CO primary but I won’t be surprised if it expands his lead in other primary states. I also won’t be surprised if it expands his lead over Biden in national polls.

 

[RandyRebecca]

Two Democratic presidents, Truman in 1948 and Johnson in 1964, weren't on the ballot in Alabama, and still won the election nationwide.

Republican President Taft wasn't on the ballot in California and South Dakota in 1912, but he lost heavily nationwide due to the Republican split with Theodore Roosevelt, who competed alongside Democrat Woodrow Wilson, and also against Socialist Eugene Debs and Prohibitionist Eugene Chafin.

 

[Bn2f]

You may be right. And if so, what should the rightfully aggrieved Americans who are being denied the protection of the constitution by partisan right wing "justices" do in response???



I know what the MAGAts would do if the situation were EXACTLY reversed…

I joke but I think we already have the answer from Roe. This should be a 9-0 ruling but we know Thomas has no more f’s to give and Alito may side with him. 7-2 for Colorado? Democrats will mobilize, playing fair, march and rely on encouraging people to vote no matter. If the conservative majority covers for trump, ignoring article 3 of the 14th - the gubamint tyranny bunch won’t bat an eye.

 

[YDB95]

I also won’t be surprised if it expands his lead over Biden in national polls.

I don't see how it'll do that. Trump is already maxed out. His cult is behind him and always will be, and everyone else knows what they're getting if they vote for him.

 

[RandyRebecca]

I agree it has no bearing on the CO primary but I won’t be surprised if it expands his lead in other primary states. I also won’t be surprised if it expands his lead over Biden in national polls.

If anything, it just undermines US democracy further.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

If anything, it just undermines US democracy further.

Yes. It’s ironic that many of the same people who are warning that Trump is a threat to democracy are trying to block a democratic election by keeping him off the ballot.

 

[RandyRebecca]

I don't see how it'll do that. Trump is already maxed out. His cult is behind him and always will be, and everyone else knows what they're getting if they vote for him.

Every criminal charge has only boosted Trump's polls. Now they are banning him from the ballot in one of the states, i.e. Colorado. What is achieved by it? It makes more people think that democracy is an illusion, a facade. And Colorado at this point is a relatively safe Democratic state anyway. Colorado hasn't voted Republican in a presidential election since 2004, and voters there voted 55.4% for Biden in 2020. Colorado was Biden's 14th strongest state, out of 25 states that Biden won overall.

 

[Lazaran]

W

Well, if you’re asking me if a ruling against what I believe to be the correct interpretation of constitutional law would make me defecate in a government building then I will resign myself to kicking trump’s ass at the ballot box.

Yeah, you got my drift.

I accidentally posted before finishing my comment.



I was definitely trying to make the point that the MAGAts would absolutely lose their shit if the situation were exactly reversed, and a Democratic ex-President who fomented and participated in an insurrection tried to reclaim the Oval Office., and a hyper partisan Democrat appointed majority on the SCOTUS ruled that they could be on the ballot.

I mean, seriously, can you fucking imagine the MAGAts reaction???



JFC

SAD!!!

 

[YDB95]

Yes. It’s ironic that many of the same people who are warning that Trump is a threat to democracy are trying to block a democratic election by keeping him off the ballot.

No it isn't. It would be if their only motivation were that they didn't like his politics. But that's not the case, no matter how many times Fox News claims otherwise. And if that were what they were after, why do it in a state he has no chance of carrying anyway?

 

[DeluxAuto]

I think I took a wrong turn... Is this the Reichguide Arizona election fraud thread?