Wat's Guns-N-Stuff Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Most other countries, even ones with heavy gun control, have no regulations on suppressors, you can buy them over the counter like any other accessory. They also consider it "neighborly" to use one.
 
What is the weight of your AR-10? I have a friend who has one and it weighs about 11 pounds with a scope installed. I'm not sure of the manufacturer of his rifle.


Of the two rifles I picked up yesterday, it was definitely the heavier box. I just checked online and read the specs 3 times - no weight given. I scanned the questions (which I almost never do) and there it was - 10 pounds, no mag. I have yet to mount the scope. I'd say this one will equal your friend's rifle's weight when it is ready to go.
 
Maybe you could put a brake on your .30-06 and use reduced recoil ammunition. Remington and Hornady make such ammunition:

https://chuckhawks.com/reduced_recoil_ammo.html

I already discussed this with a gunsmith. The amount of blast from a brake on an .06 is tremendous. Downloading the ammo doesn't help much.

He recommends I go 6mm Remington instead of the 25.06. There's a better selection of bullets and the brake won't stir up so much dirt and debris. 6mm Remington will go 800-1000 yds if that's what I want to do. Still has a big punch though.

Or I could just build something else. After some discussion a .22-250 Ackley Improved might be the ticket. It would be fun out to 600 yds, with almost no recoil to worry about, without being the usual rifle everyone else shoots.

Action/barrel and chassis would be about $1000-$1200. Adding a bipod and scope would raise that to $2000-$2200 depending on how expensive the glass gets.

Rebuilding the 30.06 wouldn't be much less than that.
 
Of the two rifles I picked up yesterday, it was definitely the heavier box. I just checked online and read the specs 3 times - no weight given. I scanned the questions (which I almost never do) and there it was - 10 pounds, no mag. I have yet to mount the scope. I'd say this one will equal your friend's rifle's weight when it is ready to go.
Yep, with a scope, loaded 20rd mag, and a can mounted on the end of the barrel you might be lucky to keep it under 13lbs (30rd mag even more) a nice load to hump around in the woods with all day.;)
 
I already discussed this with a gunsmith. The amount of blast from a brake on an .06 is tremendous. Downloading the ammo doesn't help much.

He recommends I go 6mm Remington instead of the 25.06. There's a better selection of bullets and the brake won't stir up so much dirt and debris. 6mm Remington will go 800-1000 yds if that's what I want to do. Still has a big punch though.

Or I could just build something else. After some discussion a .22-250 Ackley Improved might be the ticket. It would be fun out to 600 yds, with almost no recoil to worry about, without being the usual rifle everyone else shoots.

Action/barrel and chassis would be about $1000-$1200. Adding a bipod and scope would raise that to $2000-$2200 depending on how expensive the glass gets.

Rebuilding the 30.06 wouldn't be much less than that.
If you want a good 6mm you could go with a .243 Winchester. It's highly accurate and has a lot less recoil than a and 06;

https://www.shootingtimes.com/editorial/12-great-6mm-cartridges/383544
 
Silencer Shop one of the biggest silencer retailers in the country is located near Austin. There is quite a market for them.
Once you've shot suppressed it's hard to go back.
I'm waiting to see how the battle works out in your state. Until then if I ever feel desperate enough for one, I'll fabricate one. There's nothing terribly complicated about them. I just have no intention of EVER paying a tax to some jackasses in DC for something that should be as ubiquitous as a recoil pad.
 
I once wanted a M1A in .243, or thought that I did. I'm not sure they ever made one, but it was a nice idea.


I think we're good at the 6.5 CM now.
The 6.5 CM shoots flatter than the .308 (it's in a necked down .308 case) at about 400 to 500 yards and beyond, but if you're hunting the .308 is superior in the energy department with heavier bullets. Not saying anything against the 6.5 just saying I wouldn't go out and buy one to replace my Remington 700 in .308 for hunting deer since I'd never take a shot at a deer with it at those ranges anyway. But hey, new toys are new toys.
 
I already discussed this with a gunsmith. The amount of blast from a brake on an .06 is tremendous. Downloading the ammo doesn't help much.

He recommends I go 6mm Remington instead of the 25.06. There's a better selection of bullets and the brake won't stir up so much dirt and debris. 6mm Remington will go 800-1000 yds if that's what I want to do. Still has a big punch though.

Or I could just build something else. After some discussion a .22-250 Ackley Improved might be the ticket. It would be fun out to 600 yds, with almost no recoil to worry about, without being the usual rifle everyone else shoots.

Action/barrel and chassis would be about $1000-$1200. Adding a bipod and scope would raise that to $2000-$2200 depending on how expensive the glass gets.

Rebuilding the 30.06 wouldn't be much less than that.
I can identify with you on the recoil of a 30.06. I had a bolt action with a 3x9 variable redfield I used to hunt in Maine with. I loved that rifle it just didn’t love me lol. I couldn’t handle the recoil in my older age so I gave it to my son in law.
 
The 6.5 CM shoots flatter than the .308 (it's in a necked down .308 case) at about 400 to 500 yards and beyond, but if you're hunting the .308 is superior in the energy department with heavier bullets. Not saying anything against the 6.5 just saying I wouldn't go out and buy one to replace my Remington 700 in .308 for hunting deer since I'd never take a shot at a deer with it at those ranges anyway. But hey, new toys are new toys.

No replacements. Additions . . . .
 
What is the intended purpose HisArpy?

The actual purpose is to get out of the city and back into nature. I miss the smell of sagebrush, being sweaty and getting dirty.

Maybe down the road I might see my way into hunting again. Doubtful unless it's a guided hunt and those are about as much fun as shopping in the freezer section at the grocery store. But, who knows what the future holds, I might manage it.
 
No replacements. Additions . . . .
Been looking at pistols but haven't bought a new one as yet. Sadly, I did acquire a shotgun through the death of a close friend who died young. He inherited it from his dad who inherited it from his father. It's a Belgium-made Browning A5 shotgun. According to its serial number was made in 1935. it's in pristine condition with little signs of use. The bore is a flawless mirror finish. The only thing I see is the foam-lined case it was packed in for decades has left a minor imprint in the finish on one side of the buttstock, with no dents or damage to the wood. I thought about refinishing it but so far can't bring myself to do so. I have yet to fire a round through it but I have disassembled it and inspected its parts and all looks like new.
 
The actual purpose is to get out of the city and back into nature. I miss the smell of sagebrush, being sweaty and getting dirty.

Maybe down the road I might see my way into hunting again. Doubtful unless it's a guided hunt and those are about as much fun as shopping in the freezer section at the grocery store. But, who knows what the future holds, I might manage it.
So basically we're talking target shooting and maybe varmints in the front end with the possibility of hunting.
 
Are you primarily a target shooter or a hunting enthusiast?
So basically we're talking target shooting and maybe varmints in the front end with the possibility of hunting.


I'm primarily a shooter. I have a few personal issues with varmint shooting but no issues with hunting. My problem is that I cannot walk far, climb, or carry anything more than about 25 lbs for short short short periods of time. This limits any field work to staying close to the parking area and having a grunt to haul my stuff for me. Facts of life.

A .22-250AI works for any situation I could conceivably find myself in. Out to 200-300 yds it will take deer and smaller hogs with good shot placement and the correct bullet. It can also be used to shoot benchrest or PRS out to 500-600 yds, and might be a lot of fun to develop loads for.

6mm would be harder to deal with but with a brake it might be something worthwhile to play with and explore. The biggest turnoff is that it's a follow the herd caliber. Not into that.

The 25.06 would be a "my way" kind of rifle but without a modern following it's limited in the roles it can fill. Basically, when compared to the 25.06, the 6mm Remington is better for PRS, can hunt just as hard in the field, and would cost less to run overall. That's a face the reality situation.
 
Been looking at pistols but haven't bought a new one as yet. Sadly, I did acquire a shotgun through the death of a close friend who died young. He inherited it from his dad who inherited it from his father. It's a Belgium-made Browning A5 shotgun. According to its serial number was made in 1935. it's in pristine condition with little signs of use. The bore is a flawless mirror finish. The only thing I see is the foam-lined case it was packed in for decades has left a minor imprint in the finish on one side of the buttstock, with no dents or damage to the wood. I thought about refinishing it but so far can't bring myself to do so. I have yet to fire a round through it but I have disassembled it and inspected its parts and all looks like new.


I'm looking at all kinds of shit. I think that a couple of handguns will be on tap for next year. Existing calibers. Nothing new, and nothing exotic.
I'm primarily a shooter. I have a few personal issues with varmint shooting but no issues with hunting. My problem is that I cannot walk far, climb, or carry anything more than about 25 lbs for short short short periods of time. This limits any field work to staying close to the parking area and having a grunt to haul my stuff for me. Facts of life.

A .22-250AI works for any situation I could conceivably find myself in. Out to 200-300 yds it will take deer and smaller hogs with good shot placement and the correct bullet. It can also be used to shoot benchrest or PRS out to 500-600 yds, and might be a lot of fun to develop loads for.

6mm would be harder to deal with but with a brake it might be something worthwhile to play with and explore. The biggest turnoff is that it's a follow the herd caliber. Not into that.

The 25.06 would be a "my way" kind of rifle but without a modern following it's limited in the roles it can fill. Basically, when compared to the 25.06, the 6mm Remington is better for PRS, can hunt just as hard in the field, and would cost less to run overall. That's a face the reality situation.


I've known exactly one person who owns a .25-'06. His is a Weatherby. Only rifle he owns.


I would rather have a .243 or a .264 than a .257.


I'd never own a .270, even if that is contempt prior to investigation.
 
I'm primarily a shooter. I have a few personal issues with varmint shooting but no issues with hunting. My problem is that I cannot walk far, climb, or carry anything more than about 25 lbs for short short short periods of time. This limits any field work to staying close to the parking area and having a grunt to haul my stuff for me. Facts of life.

A .22-250AI works for any situation I could conceivably find myself in. Out to 200-300 yds it will take deer and smaller hogs with good shot placement and the correct bullet. It can also be used to shoot benchrest or PRS out to 500-600 yds, and might be a lot of fun to develop loads for.

6mm would be harder to deal with but with a brake it might be something worthwhile to play with and explore. The biggest turnoff is that it's a follow the herd caliber. Not into that.

The 25.06 would be a "my way" kind of rifle but without a modern following it's limited in the roles it can fill. Basically, when compared to the 25.06, the 6mm Remington is better for PRS, can hunt just as hard in the field, and would cost less to run overall. That's a face the reality situation.
Wats contribution aside. :p The 25-06 is enjoying a resurgence out West, mainly due to the availability of bullets that will allow the cartridge to reach it's full potential. But these new bullets well also allow some of the other 25's to achieve higher potential as well. There is NO lack of bullet selection in the 25's.

I'm going to assume that you aren't reloading so unless you are wealthy cost comes into play here as well.

All of that being said virtually all of the 6.5's, 25's, and 6's are suitable for all but the largest N. American game and all can be quite accurate. I would hesitate to go after Black Bear or Elk with the 6's, but that's just me. When you get into the newer high faluttin cartridges expect to pay..........a lot. The precision loads for the 6.5's and 6's (soon to be followed by the 25's) are going to run you anywhere from $3 to $5/rnd. Regular hunting rounds will be in the $2 to $2.50 range for those same cal. but the hunting loads will NOT achieve the same performance as the high faluttin. In that they're selling the 6.5 CM and the 6 PRC on their peak performance specs for the hunting load the performance is essentially the same as other more economical cartridges.

Long action vs. short action. Damn but that debate has been going on for years. The short action guys brag about faster reload times, which is actually in the milli-seconds. What they don't talk about is recoil recovery and target re-aquisition, which is about the same and far longer regardless of the action. I don't know why that debate is still going on?

Some perfectly suitable cartridges that have not been mentioned here are the 6.5x57 Mauser, terrific round. The 250 Savage or the 257 Roberts, also quite effective cartridges. The 243 has already been discussed.

For all of those cartridges the most important decision is barrel twist. Those high faluttin cartridges get their performance by being able to launch, and stabilize, the heavier, longer, high ballistic coefficient bullets. And in this it's the high BC that counts. Longer bullets require a faster twist rate than the run of the mill hunting bullets. So regardless of which cal. you go with you are going to want a 1:7 to 1:8 twist. I'd stick with either the 1:7 or 1:7.5. There is a trade off here though, very light thin skinned bullets may fly apart and/or become unstable with such a fast twist rate.

To get the very best out of any rifle you are either going to have to start reloading or make acquaintance with someone who does. A good rifles appetite can be very finicky. :)
 
Wats contribution aside. :p The 25-06 is enjoying a resurgence out West, mainly due to the availability of bullets that will allow the cartridge to reach it's full potential. But these new bullets well also allow some of the other 25's to achieve higher potential as well. There is NO lack of bullet selection in the 25's.

I'm going to assume that you aren't reloading so unless you are wealthy cost comes into play here as well.

All of that being said virtually all of the 6.5's, 25's, and 6's are suitable for all but the largest N. American game and all can be quite accurate. I would hesitate to go after Black Bear or Elk with the 6's, but that's just me. When you get into the newer high faluttin cartridges expect to pay..........a lot. The precision loads for the 6.5's and 6's (soon to be followed by the 25's) are going to run you anywhere from $3 to $5/rnd. Regular hunting rounds will be in the $2 to $2.50 range for those same cal. but the hunting loads will NOT achieve the same performance as the high faluttin. In that they're selling the 6.5 CM and the 6 PRC on their peak performance specs for the hunting load the performance is essentially the same as other more economical cartridges.

Long action vs. short action. Damn but that debate has been going on for years. The short action guys brag about faster reload times, which is actually in the milli-seconds. What they don't talk about is recoil recovery and target re-aquisition, which is about the same and far longer regardless of the action. I don't know why that debate is still going on?

Some perfectly suitable cartridges that have not been mentioned here are the 6.5x57 Mauser, terrific round. The 250 Savage or the 257 Roberts, also quite effective cartridges. The 243 has already been discussed.

For all of those cartridges the most important decision is barrel twist. Those high faluttin cartridges get their performance by being able to launch, and stabilize, the heavier, longer, high ballistic coefficient bullets. And in this it's the high BC that counts. Longer bullets require a faster twist rate than the run of the mill hunting bullets. So regardless of which cal. you go with you are going to want a 1:7 to 1:8 twist. I'd stick with either the 1:7 or 1:7.5. There is a trade off here though, very light thin skinned bullets may fly apart and/or become unstable with such a fast twist rate.

To get the very best out of any rifle you are either going to have to start reloading or make acquaintance with someone who does. A good rifles appetite can be very finicky. :)


I do reload for my pistols. I shoot too much to not do that. I don't experiment much with my reloading though, I need consistency out my pistols because I carry them for self defense. All my reloads are factory spec imposters. Same bullets, same powder, same charge weight, etc etc etc as the factory ammo my guns like and run reliably on.

I'm really really trying to like the idea of rebarrelling to 6mm Remington but I'm just not getting there. The smith also wants me to go with a heavy barrel which means a new stock or chassis too.

Either way, I'm going to need more stuff because the shorter rounds will need a new floorplate in the magwell and a spacer. Or get new bottom metal and run detachable mags (with a spacer).

Or I can hang it on the wall and build a .22-250AI.

No rush, I have the rest of my life to decide.

BTW, I like the 7x57 Mauser. Nobody else does, but it's a great shooting cartridge that makes the .270 look really bad and the .280 look worse. I just can't take that much recoil and the 7x57 is mild.
 
Last edited:
I do reload for my pistols. I shoot too much to not do that. I don't experiment much with my reloading though, I need consistency out my pistols because I carry them for self defense. All my reloads are factory spec imposters. Same bullets, same powder, same charge weight, etc etc etc as the factory ammo my guns like and run reliably on.

I'm really really trying to like the idea of rebarrelling to 6mm Remington but I'm just not getting there. The smith also wants me to go with a heavy barrel which means a new stock or chassis too.

Either way, I'm going to need more stuff because the shorter rounds will need a new floorplate in the magwell and a spacer. Or get new bottom metal and run detachable mags (with a spacer).

Or I can hang it on the wall and build a .22-250AI.

No rush, I have the rest of my life to decide.

BTW, I like the 7x57 Mauser. Nobody else does, but it's a great shooting cartridge that makes the .270 look really bad and the .280 look worse. I just can't take that much recoil and the 7x57 is mild.
The 6.5x57 is essentially a 7x57 necked down, very popular in Europe.

Heavy barrels. Yes, heavy barrels do perform better over all do to the fact that they're less susceptible to harmonics. Lighter barrels CAN work just as well with a 'tuner' installed.

Barrel Tuner

Another alternative is a Carbon Fiber wrapped barrel. Heavy barrel performance without the weight. Just be prepared to pay a LOT for the barrel.
https://proofresearch.com/barrels/
Carbon Fiber Barrels

If you are looking at 22-250 AI you might as well look at the 257 Roberts AI. Almost 25-06 performance without the recoil.

Re. reloading. I do the same with pistol reloading. I have a formula and stick with it. Considering the short ranges involved tenth of a grain tuning is silly. Not so with rifle, I weigh every charge individually (the exception being the 5.56. I'm not pushing that one beyond 300 yds anyway).

But to reiterate, the most important decision you're going to make is the twist rate. The trend is towards longer bullets which require faster twists.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top